Go Back   Smogon Community > Socialization in the Empire > Thread Cryonics > Closed Forums > Stark Mountain
Register FAQ Social Groups Calendar Search Today's Posts Mark Forums Read

View Poll Results: What is the most urgent thing that needs to be tested in the D/P/Pt metagame?
Retesting of Garchomp in OU in a Platinum environment 33 17.93%
Latios and Latias in OU 38 20.65%
Evasion Clause 4 2.17%
Manaphy in OU 25 13.59%
Species Clause 1 0.54%
OHKO Clause 4 2.17%
Mew in OU 5 2.72%
Arceus in Ubers 7 3.80%
Stealth Rock Removal 49 26.63%
Other (Please specify) 18 9.78%
Voters: 184. You may not vote on this poll

 
 
Thread Tools
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 1:23:52 AM   #26
ViVi
 
ViVi's Avatar
 
Join Date: Dec 2007
Posts: 3,824
Playing Call of Duty. And Fallout. And Shoddy. And breeding Shiny Charizard
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Erazor View Post
good point syberia. but come on, sand veil is hax.
How is that relavent to why Garchomp should be banned or not?
__________________


XBox Live Gamertag - IhazCandy4You (add me)
ViVi is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 1:33:49 AM   #27
Stagnant
 
Stagnant's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,928
It's as addictive as a kick from the bass drum.
Default

I picked "Other" as I think that multiple things can be done at the same time.

Chomp + Lati@s + Manaphy + Mew AND Wobbuffet should all be let into OU simultaneously as there are already suspects in OU. I see no trouble adding 4 more. Maybe they will cancel each other, out maybe not. At the very least Wobbuffet and Garchomp.

Species Clause + OHKO clauses should be disbanded. I actually see stall teams become more prevalent if this happens... which is something I hate but it may be benificial for a swing away from offense. They almost cancel each other out in some perspective.

Arceus is by definition Uber is it not? He should be uber..

SR is a nusance but it cuts sash usuage and keeps flying types in check. Thats a good thing. To bad for Moltress and Charizard but they wtill wouldnt move up to OU. Please dont qoute me on that though. Spikes is more annoying than Stealth Rock IMO.
__________________
Love is patient.
Love is kind.
Love is patient.
Love is kind.

Last edited by Stagnant; Oct 28th, 2008 at 1:35:50 AM.
Stagnant is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 1:47:04 AM   #28
Erazor
✓ Just Doug It
is a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnus
 
Erazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,657
Never never land
Default

sorry vivi, my mistake.
but once you move chomp into ubers, it has no sandstorm to abuse. and then it will be compared to rayquaza as a physical dragon sweeper. and rayquaza probably wins. so let garchomp back into OU where it shines.'

dont get me wrong, garchomp is still a major thret in ubers thanks to the special-inclined nature of ubers. but..........
Erazor is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 1:56:31 AM   #29
MythTrainerInfinity
 
MythTrainerInfinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 685
Default

Well I do think Moltres would see some decent usage if SR was banned. It would at least give Heatran, Skymin, and Scizor a good run for their money given they don't have a Rock move. Regice and Zapdos would also be firmer Skymin counters if they didn't take 25% from SR.

People would most likely move then to using Spikers, which would null most Sashers anyway, not to mention Ttar is always common. I've expressed how much I hate SR many times, so I won't beat it to death here :x
__________________
Infinity or MythTrainerInfinity on Pokemon Online.
My Art -
http://mythtrainerinfinity.deviantart.com/
MTI on AiB - http://allisbrawl.com/profile/MythTrainerInfinity.ai
MythTrainerInfinity is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 1:58:52 AM   #30
Anti
 
Anti's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2007
Posts: 5,020
let's break the rules/the ice/your heart
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat FiveKRunner View Post
Anyway, my vote went towards the retesting of Garchomp. I personally never thought that its ban was warranted. It kept the offensive D/P as what it was and since its banning I've seen numerous bulky sweepers enter the fray without fear. Things like Jirachi and Suicune no longer have to fear STAB EQ from a CBer, so long as they outspeed Mamoswine. Garchomp was never difficult to counter and the changes that Platinum has brought to this game give an even greater reason for its retesting.
what he said, emphasis on platinum changes. should occur straight after skymin.
__________________
Anti is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:02:03 AM   #31
Erazor
✓ Just Doug It
is a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnus
 
Erazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,657
Never never land
Default

i hate stealth rock too.

back to garchomp, it might - might - not stand up to ubers. especially lugia.
Erazor is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:09:05 AM   #32
Seven Deadly Sins
:D
is a Tutoris a member of the Smogon Site Staffis a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogon Mediais a Contributor to Smogonis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
 
Seven Deadly Sins's Avatar
 
Moderator
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4,175
Default

I voted SR, just because its effect would be the most interesting.

Also, will everyone shut the hell up about Garchomp being terrible in Ubers? First off, a couple neat notes. Garchomp outspeeds pretty much every relevant Uber except Lati@s, Darkrai, and Deoxys-A, with STAB on a great attacking type in Dragon. It's not weak to SR and its 130 base attack is still phenomenal.

But that's not the point. Ubers is a *ban tier*. Mew is a great Pokemon, but not in Ubers. Manaphy is a great Pokemon, but not in Ubers. The only reason an Ubers metagame even exists is because people feel like playing with ridiculously overpowered Pokemon, something that was never intended for Ubers. BL also isn't a real tier, but because people don't play it (except for a couple fringe-dwellers), people don't bitch about "Arcanine sucks in BL, move it to UU" or the like. It always pisses me off when people don't understand the fundamentals of the tier system when they bitch about it.

Anyway, carry on. Don't let my little rant derail you, because this is a pretty neat topic.

EDIT: hi5 syberia
__________________
Seven Deadly Sins is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:09:24 AM   #33
Syberia
 
Syberia's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 4,905
Irvine, CA
Default

Ubers is about how broken something is in OU. The fact that Garchomp sucks in Ubers (which, by the way, is totally untrue) is absolutely irrelevant.
__________________
Black/White Friend Code: 1721 2578 4968

My Pokemon | Free Pokemon | YouTube | Wonder Cards (now with Movie Celebis for Platinum and HG/SS!)
Syberia is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:12:36 AM   #34
Erazor
✓ Just Doug It
is a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnus
 
Erazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,657
Never never land
Default

i never said that garchomp sucks in ubers. just that it will not compare to ,say, rayquaza.

but i get your points. sorry.
Erazor is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:25:06 AM   #35
MythTrainerInfinity
 
MythTrainerInfinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 685
Default

Well a Choice Scarf Garchomp outruns every other Dragon in Ubers (most likely the Lati twins always carry Soul Dew) and it makes an excellent revenge killer. I'm open to the testing of it, I just don't think that it'll change much.

Just imagine how much a Garchomp will be complimented by having a couple Trickers alongside it on a team. It still would be the fastest Dragon in OU and let's not forget why we just bumped Deo-S back up.
__________________
Infinity or MythTrainerInfinity on Pokemon Online.
My Art -
http://mythtrainerinfinity.deviantart.com/
MTI on AiB - http://allisbrawl.com/profile/MythTrainerInfinity.ai
MythTrainerInfinity is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 2:30:50 AM   #36
Bourbon
 
Join Date: Sep 2007
Posts: 3,047
Default

I want to try Latias and Latios in OU (without Soul Dew). They have plenty of exploitable weaknesses and sort of limited movepools. Neither of them learn Fire attacks so they will have problems getting past Steels.
Bourbon is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 3:27:59 AM   #37
Darth Meanie
 
Darth Meanie's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 580
Fresno, Ca
Default

A ban of Soul Dew that would come with Lati@s introduction wouldn't be regulated in Ubers.

I think that Stealth Rock is without a doubt the one move that has the biggest effect on the metagame. Pokemon that have a 4x rock weakness are almost always discarded; Focus Sashes are never used, and some leads exist purely to set up stealth rock and die.

I can't say whether a metagame without Stealth Rock would be better or not with certainty: Salamence and Gyarados and Skymin would get very unnecessary boosts, and Focus Sash is a real F*** You item to put on a Poke.

It is definetely important enought to warrant a test soon, simply because of how central it is to the metagame.
__________________
Maybe if my signature is clever enough I will finally be loved.

Thanks to Moft for this wicked avatar!
Darth Meanie is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 3:36:58 AM   #38
ChronoSquare
 
ChronoSquare's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jun 2007
Posts: 329
Arizona
Default

Voted for the clauses, more specifically Evasion first then if I could've OHKO and species. They were staples that carried over from the previous generations, were they not? Without testing them how detrimental can we say they are on the current metagame, if someone wants to rely on luck why not let them try? People use paraflinch sets on Togekiss and the like very often, and its effective use boils down to luck; as it is I've read a few warstories where at one point it came down to breaking a stalemate via a well-timed crit, that is inofitself very much luck-based. (I myself had that situation in UU, Cursemuk v. Bulktop. I got a crit and won through his upped def.)

Given the nature of Pokemon, luck is bound to be a factor; whether it's a lucky ice beam freeze or a miss on a crucial Megahorn for the OHKO, there's no escaping luck. Even were we to make every move 100% and remove all additional effects, there would STILL be chance in the form of how damage is done. Some are luckier than others and like to rely on that luck, so why not let them try their hand?

Moves like Mud-Slap are allowed, so why not Double Team? All DT does is give a turn for a counter to switch-in, and with only one evasion level it would be no worse than say Brightpowder on Mamoswine. (Although I'd have to admit, sand veil/snow cloak activate + BP + DT would cause a headache... worst case scenario on that would be Garchomp, but he's already got other moves more worthy of his time...) Not to mention a hazer/phazer could counter that stuff as easily as it counters any other stat-boosting pokemon, only easier since the evasion pokemon hasn't done anything to their offensive capabilities, and likewise can't threaten the hazer/phazer any more than that pokemon usually does...
__________________
Platinum FC: 0775-0254-3887 "Zippy"
Quote:
Medicham used Hi Jump Kick.
It's super effective!
Medicham's attack missed!
Medicham kept going and crashed!
Medicham lost 124% of its health.
ChronoSquare's Medicham fainted.

Last edited by ChronoSquare; Oct 28th, 2008 at 3:39:42 AM.
ChronoSquare is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 4:21:43 AM   #39
Darkmalice
 
Darkmalice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,175
Adelaide, Australia
Default

I voted for SR. Most teams use it, and its so easy to set up whilst removing it is much harder due to very few spinners that get blocked by the so common gengar and rotom (plus dusknoir & spiritomb).

What will worry me is if SR gets banned, how popular and strong will Gyara and Zapdos become? I suspect a rise in Yanmega and Moltres, but they're arguably not as game breaking as the other two. Spikes and Tspikes would probably become more common too.
__________________
Wanna play Doubles? Check it out here!

Let's make this metagame official!

Last edited by Darkmalice; Oct 28th, 2008 at 4:24:52 AM.
Darkmalice is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 5:01:09 AM   #40
Erazor
✓ Just Doug It
is a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnus
 
Erazor's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 1,657
Never never land
Default

even though i voted for garchomp, i would like to see a revision f some clauses. someone here put forward a very good argument for evasion clause. if evasion isnt allowed, then why is flinching allowed?

evasion is part and parcel(or was meant to be) of the game.

and under evasion clause, doesnt sand veil count? or brightpowder?
Erazor is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 6:12:07 AM   #41
Objection
 
Objection's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 5,095
Default

I voted for the retest of Garchomp in OU simply because I don't fully understand why it was considered uber in the first place.
__________________
<dogfish44> I got a suprise KFC ^.^
<Glacier> kinky fat chick?

Objection is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 6:19:57 AM   #42
C. Falcon
Banned deucer.
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 119
England.
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Ranz View Post
Im Thinking that Garchomp SHOULD be back in OU. Alot of things Counter it.

-Weavile
-Mamoswine


Anyways, Its not that Frightening, Its just like Salamence.
Those aren't counters.

Weavile and Mamoswine can't take attacks from Garchomp.

I think Garchomp would be less Uber now, he still might be Uber but I doubt it, with all the priority moves going on and Skymin (Although Deoxys-S going to Uber has meant there's one less thing that outspeeds with an ice attack). He still might be able to take down at least one pokemon but unlike before its not a guarentee...
C. Falcon is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 6:32:54 AM   #43
Chou Toshio
Hmmm... A name for the plan...
is an Artistis a Contributor to Smogon Mediais a Contributor to Smogonis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
 
Chou Toshio's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 6,938
Sea Forest
Default

Lati@s is also pretty much stopped cold by Tyranitar, barring surf (right, surf), and are pursuit weak. Still, even putting offensive potential aside, fair defensive stats alongside a breadth of resistances including ground immunity and no glaring weaknesses bothers me.

Skymin ought to be tested (and is being tested), but generally speaking I think it should remain in OU. Grass is a terrible STAB to rely on, and resisted by so many top OU pokes it's ridiculous. Serene Grace defensive drop is just about the only way to even begin getting around that weakness, in other words it's still pretty underwhelming.

If there's an argument for skymin's ban, it's almost solely based on serene grace air slash from 127 speed. Flying on the other hand, is a very nice STAB to have and depend on, and of course the flinch chance from air slash is impressive.

Over all though, skymin just does not hit hard enough or reliably enough. The misses and non-flinches cost it its life in most cases, and happen to often for it to be truly effective without quite a bit of hax.

I'd like to have it around as a check for bulky waters (who can still kill it with a smart ice beam on switch in).
__________________


"Hmmm... a name for this plan..."
Chou Toshio is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 6:42:56 AM   #44
MetaNite
 
MetaNite's Avatar
 
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 1,510
NJ-
Default

Lati@s has Grass Knot for Tyranitar. And the only reason I see them as Ubers is Soul Dew. They should be allowed in standard play, or at least tested when they don't have Soul Dew.

Skymin is pretty amazing to me. It's got great speed, good attack, and pretty adequate defenses. Seed Flare is amazing if used on the switch, and then just bam away with Aire Slash until they're flinched to death. The only problem is Ice Shard revenge killers, which good bring Garchomp back into the mix... but I think it's too soon to test.

Saying Garchomp isn't Uber anymore, is pretty much like saying Ho-oh isn't Uber when both of them should be. Garchomp is Uber because unlike all those other 600 BST guys, it gets Sword Dance and has great speed. Dragonite, Tyranitar, Salamance, nor Metagross get Sword Dance.

I think Manaphy should be tested. It doesn't have a movepool like Mew, yet they have the same stats. It has common weakness to Electric and Grass, it doesn't have the greatest speed to sweep with Tail Glow. The only thing keeping it in Ubers is Kyogre's Rain? That shouldn't be enough.

Last edited by MetaNite; Oct 28th, 2008 at 6:45:04 AM.
MetaNite is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 7:22:51 AM   #45
Darkmalice
 
Darkmalice's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 1,175
Adelaide, Australia
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat MetaNite View Post
Lati@s has Grass Knot for Tyranitar. And the only reason I see them as Ubers is Soul Dew. They should be allowed in standard play, or at least tested when they don't have Soul Dew.
Lati@s won't OHKO Tar with Grass Knot, while Tar OHKOs back with Crunch, and can trap them with Pursuit. They should be tested (though personally, I feel Lati@s should be uber due to great stats and movepool without a 4x weakness)

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat MetaNite View Post
I think Manaphy should be tested. It doesn't have a movepool like Mew, yet they have the same stats. It has common weakness to Electric and Grass, it doesn't have the greatest speed to sweep with Tail Glow. The only thing keeping it in Ubers is Kyogre's Rain? That shouldn't be enough.
It's got 2 less speed than Garchomp, no x4 weakness and after using Rain Dance, it has an instant heal with Rest. And its pretty bulky with 100 stats in everything. Its movepool isn't good, but it's just what it needs. Personally, I'm against a Manaphy test - Surf + Tail Glow/Ice Beam/Grass Knot Rain Dance + Rest = overcentralised Manaphy counters like Vaporeon and Kingdra, and OHKOing it is extremely difficult withou a berry.
__________________
Wanna play Doubles? Check it out here!

Let's make this metagame official!
Darkmalice is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 7:54:35 AM   #46
lati0s
 
lati0s's Avatar
 
Join Date: Sep 2008
Posts: 1,492
Default

i voted for allowing lati@s in ou because i think the only thing keeping them in ubers is soul dew, which is already banned in battle tower and at nintendo tournaments, and because i love latios
__________________
Formerly latios315
lati0s is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 8:03:52 AM   #47
MythTrainerInfinity
 
MythTrainerInfinity's Avatar
 
Join Date: Aug 2006
Posts: 685
Default

If I did my calcs right... +SAtk natured Latios with Expert Belt and Latias with a Life Orb can 2HKO 252 HP/0 SDef Ttar with Grass Knot. So to be fair, Ttar is not a safe switch in to them.
__________________
Infinity or MythTrainerInfinity on Pokemon Online.
My Art -
http://mythtrainerinfinity.deviantart.com/
MTI on AiB - http://allisbrawl.com/profile/MythTrainerInfinity.ai
MythTrainerInfinity is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 8:04:43 AM   #48
X-Act
np: Biffy Clyro - Shock Shock
is a Researcher Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis an Administrator Alumnus
 
X-Act's Avatar
 
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 4,679
Malta
Default

Quote:
Originally Posted by Fat Erazor View Post
i voted for the re-testing of garchomp.

tyranitar and garchomp share the same base stat total. they learn practically the same moves. and tyranitar has the larger-albeit marginal- attack stat. while it is slower by a great deal, it is bulkier. so why does garchomp get banned to ubers, and not tyranitar?
they both have 4x weaknesses to very common offensive types(ice and fight).
so lets bring garchomp back to OU.
This argument is so flawed it's not even funny. :(

Last time I checked, Tyranitar doesn't get STAB on Outrage, Earthquake and Draco Meteor. Hell, it doesn't even GET Draco Meteor. And Outrage used on something that's not a Dragon-type is basically suicide.

Tyranitar doesn't get Swords Dance either. And Garchomp doesn't get Dragon Dance. They learn practically the same moves eh?

How can you even compare Garchomp with Tyranitar? If Tyranitar were to go to uber sometime in the future (which I highly doubt will ever happen), it would be uber for reasons completely different from those of Garchomp.
__________________
http://users.smogon.com/X-Act

For all your Pokemon needs (and more!) including: the Defensive EVs applet, the Probabilities of Breeding IVs in Pokemon applet, and the Ratings of Pokemon Base Stats applet (now Version 2.0!). And also the IV to PID applet!
X-Act is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 8:12:28 AM   #49
Darklord
 
Darklord's Avatar
 
Join Date: Oct 2008
Posts: 361
Default

If we ban Soul Dew we might as well ban Thick Club and Light Ball.

The Lati twins have counters in OU. Scizor, Metagross and Tyranitar can bring them down with powerful pursuits and Blissey walls them all day long.

Anyway, I voted others because of Skymin. I believe it's best we test the OU environment for suspects first and then start testing the Ubers. The less suspects in OU the better.
Darklord is offline  
Old Oct 28th, 2008, 8:16:54 AM   #50
mien
is a Pokémon Researcheris a Forum Moderator Alumnus
 
mien's Avatar
 
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 642
Belgium
Default

Voted SR for being the most ridicolous move in the game

The ''some pokemon will become unbeatable argument'' seems flawed to me. If there are pokemon who are unbeatable unless you have SR to aid you they simply should be Uber right away.
mien is online now  
  Smogon Community > Socialization in the Empire > Thread Cryonics > Closed Forums > Stark Mountain

« Previous Thread | Next Thread »
Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off



All times are GMT -4. The time now is 8:10:24 PM.