|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#1 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,038
|
I was thinking, teams with more than one of the same team might be quite interesting, and since few play without Species Clause I was wondering if anyone would be interested in such a tournament. It might have to have certain rules, like having to say from the beginning what pokemon you would have more than one of, and some other stuff.
|
|
|
|
|
#2 |
|
Join Date: Dec 2005
Posts: 4
|
Gengar would be gay due to his movepool.
|
|
|
|
|
#3 |
|
Bag
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,636
St. Louis
|
Would your team have to consist of only one pokemon? Or, could you have up to 3 different Pokes? (since each poke on your team must be represented at least twice.) You need to be more clear!!
|
|
|
|
|
#4 |
|
pfbwowbfobwobwobfwowbf
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,836
Most of them are good
|
If you just make it a tournament without Species Clause I'd still do a normal 6-poke team, double Pokémon might be a nice surprise but it also enlarges your weakness.
|
|
|
|
|
#5 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,017
|
i don't get some of this really, is it a tournament with all 6 of the same? Or a tournament where it is possible to like have 3 a poke and 3 b poke?
i might be interested..
__________________
[17:37:57] legenario: Fuck mother full Smogon Netbattle [17:38:19] legenario: cold fuck [17:38:36] legenario: battle me your fuck [22:25:37] Dark Flow: I am an expert of pokemons PSYCHOLOGICAL types! [22:24:24] Jirachi: you fucker [22:24:27] Jirachi: i play with you |
|
|
|
|
#6 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 2,061
London
|
I agree with Haxubers idea with 3a and 3b pokes, gogo Celebi-Zapdos
__________________
You Go? |
|
|
|
|
#7 |
Moderator
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 7,038
|
A one-pokemon team would be dumb because you'd then have some matches decided before they've even started, like 6 Salamences would all fail against any fast Ice attacker. Ok then, 3 same 3 different pokemon, that sounds good.
|
|
|
|
|
#8 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 248
In my workplace
|
go celebi metagross and ttar pwn everyone
|
|
|
|
|
#9 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 346
Haggisville (aka Scotland)
|
Um...what?
:/
__________________
Scotland. It isn't shit. |
|
|
|
|
#10 |
|
Bag
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Sep 2005
Posts: 3,636
St. Louis
|
You'd have to make the rules very specific. 3 different Pokes w/ 2 of each poke sounds the best to me.
|
|
|
|
|
#11 |
|
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 1,017
|
Whether it's 3a, 3b or 2a/2b/2c, I think I might play. I have a few ideas for either type of team.
__________________
[17:37:57] legenario: Fuck mother full Smogon Netbattle [17:38:19] legenario: cold fuck [17:38:36] legenario: battle me your fuck [22:25:37] Dark Flow: I am an expert of pokemons PSYCHOLOGICAL types! [22:24:24] Jirachi: you fucker [22:24:27] Jirachi: i play with you |
|
|
|
|
#12 |
|
I'm not retarded I'm Canadian it's different
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 6,128
Canada eh
|
I play everything and this sounds aiight :)
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
#13 |
|
Join Date: Nov 2005
Posts: 58
Queens, NY
|
Idea sounds great. The problem is going to be similar teams that end up in luck. Baton passing will be awesome, as I doubt someone will carry a pokemon just for hazing or phazing.
But sign me up, and as for me, I like the 2a, 2b, 2c thing. And just a suggestion, perhaps limit the base stat totals of the three pokemon, because I see a lot of celebi (600), t-tar (600), metagross (600), zapdos (580), etc. If say you said the most base stats of the three different types of pokemon would be something like 1600, then it would eliminate some of the gay 1800 base teams, or more specifically, prevent everyone using the same powerful Pokemon. Nonetheless, this is just a thought. |
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|