[Vote] Sleep Clause

Firestorm · Oct 24th, 2010, 3:01:52 AM

As per this topic. No objections were made so this poll will close at 11:59 PM Pacific Time on October 30th, 2010. If 66.00% or higher vote to have a sleep clause, we will start the fifth generation with sleep clause in effect.

Erazor · Oct 24th, 2010, 3:23:55 AM

I voted for starting with Sleep Clause. Having one pokemon asleep in 4th gen is bad enough. Now with the new sleep mechanics, not enforcing a sleep clause would make the game utterly unplayable.

Yllnath · Oct 26th, 2010, 4:01:36 AM

I'd like to note that there is/was still a discussion going on about how to implement sleep clause (Classic, or auto-forfeit when breaking). I voted yes as I believe Sleep clause is important, However, I do like to know if this Yes means "Yes, let's use the Classic Sleep Clause that was also used in Gen IV" or if it means "Yes, let's use Sleep Clause, but the implementation of said Sleep Clause is yet to be determined".

If it's the first option, I'd prefer a third poll option which pretty much would mean something like "Yes, Sleep Clause, but different implementation". (which would get my vote)

**capefeather** · Oct 26th, 2010, 10:07:30 AM

I think that if Yes won, a poll with implementation would follow up.

Firestorm · Oct 26th, 2010, 3:32:37 PM

This is about using a sleep clause at all. People can continue to debate the implementation in the thread that was made for it.

View Poll Results: Should we start Generation V with Sleep Clause in effect?
Yes, start with sleep clause	116	95.87%
No, start without sleep clause	5	4.13%
Voters: 121. You may not vote on this poll

Oct 24th, 2010, 3:01:52 AM	#1
Firestorm I did my best, I have no regrets! Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 7,272 Vancouver, BC	[Vote] Sleep Clause As per this topic. No objections were made so this poll will close at 11:59 PM Pacific Time on October 30th, 2010. If 66.00% or higher vote to have a sleep clause, we will start the fifth generation with sleep clause in effect. __________________

Oct 24th, 2010, 3:23:55 AM	#2
Erazor ✓ Just Doug It Join Date: Oct 2008 Posts: 1,663 Never never land	I voted for starting with Sleep Clause. Having one pokemon asleep in 4th gen is bad enough. Now with the new sleep mechanics, not enforcing a sleep clause would make the game utterly unplayable. __________________ Credit to Legacy Raider for the awesome Avatar. Check out my Archived Warstory between me and Lemmiwinks MkII

Oct 26th, 2010, 10:07:30 AM	#4
capefeather Here's my mega plan: YOU DIE Moderator Join Date: Apr 2009 Posts: 2,636 I'm a super fighting robot from the year 2010	I think that if Yes won, a poll with implementation would follow up. __________________ If we cannot take joy in things that are merely real, our lives will always be empty. <+joshe> im a registered sex offender for up to calc 3 <%V4> Naruto is climaxing! <+Reflect_Suicune> i was thining of fucking jellicent for some reason

Oct 26th, 2010, 3:32:37 PM	#5
Firestorm I did my best, I have no regrets! Join Date: Apr 2007 Posts: 7,272 Vancouver, BC	This is about using a sleep clause at all. People can continue to debate the implementation in the thread that was made for it. __________________

Oct 26th, 2010, 4:01:36 AM	#3
Yllnath Join Date: Dec 2008 Posts: 304	I'd like to note that there is/was still a discussion going on about how to implement sleep clause (Classic, or auto-forfeit when breaking). I voted yes as I believe Sleep clause is important, However, I do like to know if this Yes means "Yes, let's use the Classic Sleep Clause that was also used in Gen IV" or if it means "Yes, let's use Sleep Clause, but the implementation of said Sleep Clause is yet to be determined". If it's the first option, I'd prefer a third poll option which pretty much would mean something like "Yes, Sleep Clause, but different implementation". (which would get my vote)