|
|||||||
![]() |
|
|
Thread Tools |
|
|
#26 | |
|
GENE
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Moderator
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 2,715
Buffalo, NY
|
Quote:
such an abysmal post |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#27 |
|
I did my best, I have no regrets
![]() ![]()
FABULOUS Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 3,571
|
Speaking of the "original era" for ADV, am I the only one who isn't deeply confused about how AJC managed to avoid a permban in those days?
Or even now, frankly? |
|
|
|
|
|
#28 |
|
The world will still be here when I open my eyes
|
To echo earlier sentiments/the PR thread, if anything is banned, I'd hope it would be Ingrain Smeargle.
That way you can still use as many BP'ers are you want. Hell, you can still use Smeargle as a trapper (Spore/Spider Web/BP/Sub). It's just that Ingrain completely nukes the most viable BP team counter (p-hazing). I doubt any of the good players here from the ADV era have ever had significant problems with a full BP team that didn't have Ingrain Smeargle.
__________________
![]() ~ I...AM...in a world of shit! |
|
|
|
|
|
#29 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 71
|
It's impossible to realize whether BP is broken or not, because most teams on the ladder are currently VERY anti-BP, which they wouldn't be if the suspect test wasn't ongoing. I just faced a guy who had Perish Song Celebi AND Roar Salamence on the same team - he most likely wouldn't be carrying both of these pokes had it not been for the test. Another player had both Taunt/Whirlwind max speed Skarmory and Roar Raikou. I doubt they would use the same teams if BP wasn't being tested. We cannot determine how broken BP is in the ADV metagame, since during this suspect test people change their teams to adjust to a different metagame, a BP-centric one.
I doubt i explained this well enough, but i hope i got my point across. |
|
|
|
|
|
#30 |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,815
Erry day im HEAD SMASHING
|
Wait a second...if you can't decide if BP is broken because everything is anti-BP, then wouldn't that just be a stronger argument to ban it? I know the term 'overcentralization' is thrown around too much...but if everything is BP-centric, that would be a definite indication of it being broken.
__________________
Ten million fireflies |
|
|
|
|
|
#31 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 152
JERSEY
|
but not everything is anti-bp. You only need a few things on your team to actually match up against BP. people who are running entirely anti-bp teams (and losing) aren't particularly good tbh... (especially considering how bad most of the people running BP teams are!). Seriously, I have been laddering for two days. I am already ranked 6th (was a breeze ~_~) and I've only lost twice. Neither loss was to a BP team. I've encountered like 6 or 7 BP teams and I've had no problems, simply because I have a decent amount of offense and a phazer on all my teams. Roar Zapdos really gives BP teams a hard time, and it works good with spikes is just a good set overall. It isn't that hard to make things that work against BP teams work WITH your team. The only time I've actually seen a BP team win was Jules vs. a team that was utterly unprepared for BP. And just before that he had lost to someone who, honestly, didn't seem very good at all :x But the dude had Skarm to phaze and a bunch of random offense-oriented mons on his team like Sceptile, and he wore out the BP team before it had a chance to get anything going. I think many of you are overestimating BP teams a bit, as well as the competence of the people who are using them. (not Jules, that guy is pretty competent.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
#32 |
|
Join Date: Oct 2010
Posts: 71
|
^We faced earlier today and you had Roar Zapdos, WW Skarmory, and Screech Flygon lol. No wonder you can deal with BP.
@shmashlloyd: you didn't get my point. |
|
|
|
|
|
#33 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 152
JERSEY
|
Those were two different teams though lol. I use ww skarmory on most teams. I just happened to have screech flygon on that team (it's not for BP) and i just happened to have Roar zapdos on that other team (it just works well for the team, since i have spikes and I don't really need hp grass for swampert). It's not like I am taking drastic measures to deal with BP, I just know how to beat it with what I have... Like I said, I've only lost twice, and most of the teams I've played were NOT BP TEAMS. I'm not prepared for BP, I'm prepared for anything (or I'm trying to be, anyway.) Anyone can do the same. It doesn't take that much effort...
edit: by "it's not for BP" I mean, I was using the same set before this whole suspect test even came to be. The team is really old. |
|
|
|
|
|
#34 |
|
im kinda the shit
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 748
|
yo dont hate on my cb slaking team its amazing
and i consider myself decent thank you very much
__________________
![]() BKC: i'm sorry lol i know i bs'd you Lavos Spawn: youre seriously going to bs me like this Lavos Spawn: damn Lavos Spawn: guess the game is more important than the friendship |
|
|
|
|
|
#35 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2006
Posts: 152
JERSEY
|
Oh, was that you? Well, alrighty then. I wasn't paying much attention to the match, I was just assuming based on the pokemon. It's not a particularly bold assumption if you consider some of the people you encounter on the ladder... The point is, it doesn't really take that much to beat BP. You don't need to use a bog standard team and stuff it with anti-BP nonsense AND get lucky to beat a BP team, as some dudes are claiming.
and i was by no means hating on your team, sire. |
|
|
|
|
|
#36 | |
|
pfbwowbfobwobwobfwowbf
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Administrator
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 13,836
Most of them are good
|
Quote:
Also, as annoying as AJC is, this is trying to find a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. I love making fun of him as much as the next guy but sometimes he can be right! |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#37 | |
|
Join Date: Aug 2010
Posts: 2,815
Erry day im HEAD SMASHING
|
Quote:
And I see your point now. But what's the point of the test if we can't figure out what we're testing is broken or not in a normal meta? Whether it s broken or not in a meta where everyone prepares for it isn't helping us.
__________________
Ten million fireflies |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#38 | |
|
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 359
|
Hey, I made a vast series of really shitty posts a few years ago. Anyway I was just curiously browsing this site again for the first time in a while and was surprised to see suspect testing in ADV, which was the time I most actively played <3 Netbattle etc
So I read the arguments in the policy review section and honestly don't remember there ever being a fuss about baton pass at the time. Sure you'd occassionally get "no Bp teams" in their netbattle info but nowhere near as much as you'd see "no SkarmBliss!!" and cannot imagine the metagame having changed much, if at all, since then to make BP teams the guarenteed win unless "obscure" counters are used. This post in particular I would like to address: Quote:
b) You mean that pokémon with 55/35/45 defences and 75 speed? c) Perfect is overstating it as is saying you need little to use the baton pass team. Getting in smeargle and using umbreon effectively was not the cake walk you imply especially with how the metagame was dominated by bulky hard hitters like suicune, raikou, tyranitar, salamence and gyarados. Umbreon suffered from a subpar healing move and will get worn down, and smeargle needed a sub to get in which won't always be possible. Its been a while so there are probably glaring problems with both these examples, still I do not remember BP teams to be the cheap strat some people are insisting. d) Taunt was a lot less common in ADV than it was at the beginning of DP but it was not totally absent, standard move on Umbreon and you'd see the occassional gyarados carrying it. Also I'm not sure if they OHKO umbreon but afaik heracross, breloom and medicham could. Also my experience from using umbreon was it easy to wear down due to not many useful resistances and sub par healing moves, limiting its ability to play its wobbu like strategy, however I'm not so sure that experience is all that relevent to BP chain Umbreon. e) ADV sure seemed a lot less luck reliant than DP. My old 2 cents, probably flawed due to my lack of ability to theorycraft since I don't remember some specifics. OT: What happened to firebot? At least trou is still on top form. Actually don't bother answering, off I go to probably never return, and nothing of value was lost to you.
__________________
MAH BOI take a look at my stuff: http://www.smogon.com/forums/showthread.php?t=24206 FC: 1676 0911 3625 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#39 |
|
Join Date: Feb 2006
Posts: 730
|
I wasn't a top player in advance but I was decent and played in a good number of tournaments. I never remember a top player (except VIL) using a Baton Pass in a major tournament. I think there was definitely a strong soft ban on using BP teams. If a goal of the ADV tours is to capture how ADV was actually played I think BP should be banned.
Joining the suspect test now regardless.
__________________
"One day we will die, and our ashes will fly from the aeroplane over the sea/ but now are young, let us lay in the sun, and count every beautiful thing we can see." d028ad6e |
|
|
|
|
|
#40 |
|
is a competitor
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jan 2008
Posts: 3,237
Passaic County, NJ
|
I have played quite a bit on ladder and seen Baton Pass around. I have beaten it many more times than it has beaten me. It certainly isn't broken, but I think it does take away from the quality of the game. You can have some nice checks and still phaze Smeargle in and manage to have just enough coverage to get their boosts started.
Smeargle + Ingrain ban would be the only thing I would really sign off on.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#41 |
|
Professor
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,447
|
I agree with KG. Baton Pass is easily beaten, but you do need to have a few things on your team to counter it.
Also, I want to bring up another problem. The suspect test ends at 11:59 EST, leaving people on GMT time at a disadvantage. Because it is based on ranking now and not points, we can easily be knocked just out of the voting range right before it ends, because we cant stay up till 4 in the morning. Thoughts?
__________________
GP / UU QC, VM for check VM for a UU rate |
|
|
|
|
|
#42 |
|
also known as Darkwing_Duck
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,043
Location: Andromeda Galaxy
|
Technically, Mooo, no matter what timezone you fix deadline to be, there will be some people who get screwed over by it under the new system.
|
|
|
|
|
|
#43 |
|
Join Date: Jan 2010
Posts: 1,674
Minnesota
|
I've faced a bunch of BP teams, and I find them quite annoying, but not banworthy. It just take a bit of thinking to beat them. As KG said, I find it annoying when I phaze Smeargle in cause he outspeeds Skarm and gets his Ingrain in. I don't want to fully ban BP, but I will support banning Smeargle + Ingrain to limit what BP can do.
__________________
ASB Profile [19:35:22] <@Charmander> alphajolt just has the worst luck [19:35:22] <@Charmander> like [19:35:35] <@Charmander> his luck is worse than prem's lc abilities [03:49:23]<toshimelonhead> jolteon's shiny looks like gf pissed on the normal one |
|
|
|
|
|
#44 |
|
Professor
![]() ![]() ![]()
Join Date: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,447
|
Yeah, it's kind of unfair imo, isn't there a fairer way to do suspect rounds?
__________________
GP / UU QC, VM for check VM for a UU rate |
|
|
|
|
|
#45 |
|
Life Stream
![]()
Join Date: Aug 2007
Posts: 1,325
Detroit, Michigan
|
I two have found Baton Pass lackluster in my experience, though working off of what Synre previously said, it could actually be the quality of the players reflecting it, and I've just yet to play good people using it? I'll keep going.
__________________
Your values is a disarrayed, prioritizing horribly Unhappy with the riches cause your piss poor morally Ignoring all prior advice and fore warning, and mighty full of ourselves all of a sudden aren't we? |
|
|
|
|
|
#46 | |
![]()
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,347
|
From the last time I posted, I've noticed Ingrain is what truly makes BP broken. I would consider just resorting to an Ingrain ban on Smeargle(Sk's Idea) because it makes BP nearly unuseable. It also discourages the use of full BP teams, as a result of the team matchup dependency.
__________________
Quote:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#47 |
|
is a sloth
Join Date: Jan 2011
Posts: 733
Michigan
|
Exactly ENZ0, seeing as Ingrain is the only thing really making up BP broken that atm should be the only thing that really is banned. if you guys want my opinion lol. Altho, i'm just repeating ENZ0 and Sk really.
__________________
|
|
|
|
|
|
#48 |
|
GO JETS GO
![]() ![]() Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 5,090
CanaJew
|
Enough said
I shouldn't lose to a guy who sand attacks Metagross because of a prediction that I was almost deemed to not win. (50% to guess whether he spores or ingrains, then Sleep talk needs to not pick Rock Slide, and then if it picks Megahorn, it needs to hit.) Ingrain is annoying, but really why do all teams need to carry something with Roar?
__________________
f u, v |
|
|
|
|
|
#49 | |
|
also known as Darkwing_Duck
Join Date: Dec 2009
Posts: 3,043
Location: Andromeda Galaxy
|
Quote:
Its a bit like asking, "why should all teams need a gliscor/skarmory/hippowdon/roobushin/azumarill(far smaller than the userbase of Roar/WW)" in gen 5. Its just one of the things you need to pack for a dominating strategy. In my experience, BP is kind of hard to beat once it gets on a roll, but if you can cut it to size quickly, it gets much easier to deal with. |
|
|
|
|
|
|
#50 |
|
Join Date: Jul 2008
Posts: 197
Where do you live?
|
Smeargle get owned by Sleep Talk Heracross/Hariyama/Ursaring/Machamp. Or, infact, most offensive sleep talkers in general, but those ones are Guts abusers. The thing is, the only one of those you'll likely use is Heracross, although there are some very good points to using the others- mainly Hariyama, as it can WW.
__________________
Otherwise known as TM1337 Falcon Punch |
|
|
|
![]() |
| Thread Tools | |
|
|