There's a difference between being a good/bad team builder and making arguments which shows that you've clearly haven't thought about the problem clearly. I know BKC's a good teambuilder. What I can't understand is how such a good teambuilder can make such simplistic arguments between team matchups when there are over 600 Pokemon you can play around in a combination of 6. I made a quick change to the rain offense team example that he made (Toxicroak -> Virizion), and it was already far less weak to the sand stall team that he gave. It took less than a minute. There is a difference between being a good teambuilder and not being willing to put in extra effort. I'm not attacking his ability, but the arguments that he made, which were obviously not very well thought out. There's a difference between slander/libel and telling someone their argument makes no sense. And before you tell me, "why should I use Virizion, he sucks", I'd like to say "WHY aren't you willing to use something that's a little different to improve your team". Nothing sucks if it works.