I made it very clear in the OP that I don't consider BST an indicative measurement of the realism of a competitive Pokemon at all. I can provide countless examples of a high BST Pokemon with poor competitive potential, and low BST Pokemon with very serious competitive potential. The terms "realistic", "cheating", or "normal" have no say in this matter, and I will delete further posts that suggest that these adjectives are to be in any way taken seriously.
I understand that everyone wants some flavor in their stat spreads, and I agree with them, but do not mistake using a low BST as being 'more fair' than using a higher BST. That is simply not the case. There is a very good reason why BST is not used as any type of hard measurement in CAP, and why we instead use BSRs. I will not be basing my slate on the poor measurement that is BST, but instead basing it on the BSR measurements that are far more critical to the success of CAP 2. The only value BST has is that it's 'nice' or 'swell' to use BSTs that are known. 580, 600, 555, 535, whatever. That is something that is a minor detail that voters look at to decide who to vote for, and nothing more. I don't mind if a spread designer appeals to the voters' sense of flavor, but don't for a second confuse it with competitive logic.
Anyway, this only has a couple more hours, so expect it to be closed around then.