I am completely wasting my time.
##Unvote
Alright, as far as my opinions on Walrein...
It's fairly hard to get a read on day one, and he hadn't really given a solid position on any user. Before the last post, I viewed him with some suspicion, but doubted he was actually scum as he was playing quite poorly if he was, by allowing a bandwagon to get up to higher levels.
His last post contained nothing majorly illogical, and basically stopped the bandwagon in its tracks. Like I said he would. Beyond that, there still isn't a large read beyond opposing bandwagons and counter targeting most of the people who targeted him. He has a rather large list of names who many users have not been aiming at, bar a few fringe movements.
Basically, the possible scum factions (assuming their obvious, which they wouldn't be), would be Paperblade/Orcinus/Jalmont or Rediamond/Walrein/Itchini.
The Paperblade faction, if it is really scum, could be a push to get one of the most experienced villagers lynched and later claim it was "unfortunate." If Walrein is actually clean, it might be worth looking into seeing if one of these users is scum. The entire bandwagon on an experienced user when most users were being inactive seems a bit odd, but just justifiable enough for it to mean almost nothing with no further evidence.
Now, assuming that Walrein is scum, Itchini and myself would be suspect for defending Walrein by attacking Jalmont. In fact, you could make a solid case that any of our behaviour was scummy (my defense of Walrein/easiveness, Itchini attacking Jalmont and trying to appear clean via bandwagon, and the Walrein case has been done to death). Basically, I don't find either side particularly scummy and I wouldn't actually want to lynch any of these users on the chance they could be scum.
However, if a member of one side flips, it could cast some light onto the entire game. For now I purpose lynching a member of the bandwagon with less thought out posts, as a lower risk way of scouting out alignments.