Please read the OP, read the thread, and think carefully before voting. Moderators will not change votes for ANYONE, even supposed "mis-clicks". There has been a bit of controversy at the start of this first EVO project. I've discussed this issue at length with Darkie, and we think a quick side poll would be helpful to determine how the community would like to proceed. As many of you may be aware, Gormenghast recently opened a thread proposing to redo the first part of the EVO project and vote on the pokemon over again, with the specific purpose of including Camerupt in the voting options. At the start of the EVO project, he really had not fully considered the ramifications of his original votes. Gormenghast was a supporter of Farfetch'd in the beginning, but now feels that Farfetch'd is a horrible choice for the community. Since he was a cited factor in many other people's votes for Farfetch'd, he thinks he mistakenly has led the community to make a poor choice. Several members of the community support Gormenghast's new position, and think that we are making a mistake to proceed with Farfetch'd. They believe that now that much discussion has taken place within the actual voting threads, many voters have changed their minds. They think many voters would no longer support Farfetch'd in the first place. They think that many Houndoom voters were simply "anti-Farfetch'd" votes. And if Camerupt were present in the first poll, that it would now win. On the other side, we have many people who feel like the polls were conducted cleanly and fairly and there is no reason, competitively or otherwise, to redo the poll. These people believe that the majority has spoken with their votes, and there is no reason to go back and re-vote on everything. They think that there will always be a dissenting opinion, and that Gormeghast and others are no exception. Opponents of the re-vote are people who voted for Farfetch'd and would do so again, or people who feel that overturning majority-voted results is a waste of time to the community, and possibly insulting to those that honestly tried to make an intelligent vote. In my words, those are the two opposing opinions. I tried to fairly emphasize both arguments. If I did not properly represent the arguments of the two sides, then I encourage people to elaborate on the arguments in this thread. NOTE: The ONLY reason we are opening this side poll, is because this is the very first EVO project we have done. We will not be holding side polls every time someone has concerns about an in-progress project. But as it is the first EVO project, we think this is a special case.