No, he is protesting the current lynch, I am advocating it. There's a difference. Protesting is disruptive, advocating is going with the consensus already.
this is a socially problematic position, but ignoring the implications of that, you have yet to make a claim from this. if your claim is "disruptive people are mafia" then i entirely disagree with that as that is actually how villages lose mafia
With info, this is true. SB didn't have that. I also said this later on.
Perhaps in a life situation, this is true, but in mafia you have no way to confirm if anyone's information is actually greater than the amount of information you have.
Except this lynch isn't questionable, and you didn't deny the logs where you confessed. The village leader also isn't mafia. It doesn't work in this scenario. I did phrase it somewhat poorly, but by day 5 we should really have a town village leader...
Why would i deny the logs? Every conversation between me and another user that was posted in this thread occurred. What I denied was that I am not actually mafia. I have explained that my reasoning to do what I did was I was trying to find the supposed wolf partner (which in hindsight I am convinced doesn't actually exist).
There is no way to be 100% confident the village leader isn't mafia. Your reasoning appears to be that since they are a "trustworthy" authority figure we are to take their words at face value and listen to everything they say. Can you find the flaw with that line of reasoning?
Once again, Celever is purposefully using words that are misleading to make it appear as if a case against me is open and shut when in reality it is all based on luck.
Subjective point. What do the rest of the mafia team have that's better that are still alive? We know that persuader etc. isn't a thing because no one has reported it yet.
Kidnapper is a shit role. Unless you are trying to say that within the set of the roles the mafia has in this game, it is a relatively strong role, then that is debatable. In any case, you are shifting the grounds of what I even said in the first place, so good try.
LMAO, that's not even a half-decent attempt at waving the point off. You know I'm right there, which is Gale's main argument for SB's lynch.
no it's not, you literally just posted your personal philosophy of mafia. that doesn't make it true. why was he "swiftly declined" a chance to prove his role? seems like bullshit to me rofl
Ask the inspector if he targeted me last night?
I'm not the one making claims without evidence so it is not my responsibility to find proof, but yours. If you cannot be bothered to present yourself as trustworthy, I nor should anyone else bother doing it for you.
Oh my God he seriously thinks that you and toto are connected. This is absolutely hilarious! I feel a little sorry for him, though, being able to be persuaded so easily by such clear fallacy...
I really hope you are mafia giving it one last shot.
True, but he is not guessing. He said that it will happen, which is a blatant lie. However, if he said it could happen it would still be a lie in this instance, because whoever is lynched today cannot possibly have any sort of bearing on whether von is targeted with the NK or not tonight. The only way Gale could know that is if he is mafia and is planning to NK von if you are lynched, Jalmont. There are no more connections to be made, and you know it as well as I do.
Actually, how can it be a lie if the event hasn't occurred yet? There is no need to throw around such emotionally charged words like "lying" when there's no need to. In any case, there is no way to know if whoever is lynched today has any bearing on whether or not von is killed. Whether speculating about it is useful I don't know, but it is certainly not lying.
If one hypothetical scum duo has a member cleaned and the other has one probable mafia (Jalmont) and one somewhat likely mafia at this stage by virtue of role (Gale) it's a no brainer. It makes sense.
No it doesn't make sense. Me being mafia has no relevance to him being mafia. The only connection between us is we both want to lynch SB, which, in that case, everyone else who wants to do the same thing is also part of this "hypothetical scum duo."
He is lying, and I just explained why.
As previously explained you didn't. Your conception of lying is alarmingly incorrect (along with other statements but w/e)
This is way more AtE than I ever did lmao. (AtE = Appeal to Emotion)
ah yes, the brilliant celever makes such a convincing case on why he is right. how could i have ever had thought i could compete with him in a game of online mafia?
not sure why i even bothered the fact that i spent more than 2 minutes on this shit is pretty sad tbh
