Yes, but the whole purpose of the show is that the main character is supposed to be below a certain point. Ash is an expy for the audience, written in a way that things have to be explained to him, and him learning new things along the way - and so the target audience (kids who just have, or haven't yet, got the games) will learn the same things. Since the audience is constantly renewed, so must Ash's incompetence be. The Anime is an advertisement and introduction to the games. In a way, it teaches kids the basics of Pokémon. Good plot and characters will always take a back seat to those two main priorities.I'm pretty sure I've said this before, but the best course of action to improve the anime is to ditch Ash. He's only holding the show back since he's not allowed to develop past a certain point, and the constant resets to his competence are aggravating.
Until you realize that dropping a brand with global recognition hurts a franchise more than anything, heck even inland replacing Ash would cost the Pokémon company at least 4 billion over 5 years in marketing alone, without even counting the efforts in design and implementation of a new character.I'm pretty sure I've said this before, but the best course of action to improve the anime is to ditch Ash. He's only holding the show back since he's not allowed to develop past a certain point, and the constant resets to his competence are aggravating.
I never said it would be more profitable. I said it would be better.Until you realize that dropping a brand with global recognition hurts a franchise more than anything, heck even inland replacing Ash would cost the Pokémon company at least 4 billion over 5 years in marketing alone, without even counting the efforts in design and implementation of a new character.
That's a very stupid thing to say if you know a bit of marketing and know that all forms of Anime are marketing tools, few of them count as forms of art after the 80s multimedia change.
I might be a little too reactive. Ash losing to Tobias, at least Ash managed to retain his dignity with the last tie, but the way they pull that legendary guy out of nowhere is what I can't get over until now. Oh well....Wait, previous two? You mean Unova and Sinnoh? Okay, Unova I agree with, but Sinnoh? Ash's finale in the Sinnoh League had him facing a trainer who uses Legendaries and taking down two of them! That's far from humiliating, that's very impressive considering no one else could even take down Tobias's Darkrai (not even the other trainer in the Sinnoh League's final match which is where some BS comes in as that means Ash is better then 2nd place yet he just gets a semi-finalist trophy (and no recognition he DEFEATED TWO LEGENDARIES in front of a huge audience both live and televised)). The reason people were upset with Tobias because he was pretty much made to take down Ash. They introduced no "rival" trainer before the Sinnoh League and Ash defeated Paul, there wasn't really anyone to oppose Ash who not only used his good Sinnoh team but also his reserves. Thinking about, Tobias probably would have also cleaned up at the Unova and Kalos league, for the latter probably reveal he got a Mega Latios (or be used to reveal a Mega Darkrai).
Serena would be easy to get rid of, remember Palermo offered to train Serena to become a Kalos Queen so it's very likely at the end of XYZ that Serena is going to take her up on that offer.
As for Greninja, maybe it'll stay with Professor Sycamore so he could study it accessing a form just as powerful as Mega Evolution. Otherwise Ash would leave it with Professor Oak like his other Pokemon Pokemon. This is why I don't get why they put so much emphasis on Ash and Greninja's bond since, if he doesn't take it to Alola, it means jack-squat. But had he just been able to Mega Evolve then that is a skill he could take to Alola but no...
The big question is Squishy. We have the Zygarde Formes in Sun & Moon so it would make sense for it to come along. Then again all the things involving Squishy would end with XYZ. I could only thing that Ash would bring Squishy to Alola by revealing Squishy is actually from Alola, either taken from there by Team Flare or it came to Alola in order to help/get help from the Kalos Zygarde Core. Otherwise I'd say the writers would just ignore that, leave Squishy in Kalos to live happily, and if it ever comes for a Zygarde Core to be in Alola they'll just have another one pop up (since we already know there are multiples of them).
At least, I like the Showcases part as it brings fresh air. It reminds me of PokeSpe BW's White and how Pokemon wanted to dance with humans. We don't have the showtime sidequest in Kalos, so they just have to make one, but they do have other attractions like the Rhyhorn race and Sky trainers (both of which are only shown one time in anime and the former only by mom in XY although I'm interested as part of Kalos' culture, sigh). Speaking of which, sky battle will be ditched out too? Won't be surprised if it will.With that all said, while XY/XYZ didn't impress me that much except for certain moments so I'm on board changing the directors/writers, you do know the things you guys liked about it CAME from these directors and writers because they didn't care about writing a Pokemon anime, right? Pokemon Showcases & Ash-Greninja aren't in the games and a director who cares about Pokemon would probably not have made them and stuck to stuff that was in the games.
Now Pokemon Showcases turned out okay even though they were simplified/vague Pokemon Contests, but they came from the writers wanting to write a shojo idol anime which is popular right now. They didn't care about the Pokemon, they wanted to have Serena doing cute things. Showcases sort of made Pokemon tools, the female trainer was very much involved to the point they were the center point and not the Pokemon. A director/writer who cared about Pokemon wouldn't have that happened. If it was me I would probably had Serena focus on becoming a Rhyhorn Rider as that was something in the games. Also her attraction to Ash probably wouldn't exist either. The reason she acted like that was to make her character into waifu material as Ash's character was made bland enough a male fan could put themselves in Ash's place. Rhyhorn Rider Serena probably would either be more rough around the edges/tomboyish or she would have a split life style being a typical girl outside of the races and a serious, no nonsense gal when racing.
I agree - the original episodes are theoretically as bad as the new ones, except the tropes in the original series weren't done to death when it aired. The league losses in Kanto & Johto actually made sense in the narrative, as I explained earlier: In Kanto, it was a genuine twist (and the protag losing in an important tournament/trial isn't common in shonen series, but it does happen) and in Johto, it was to do a showcase of the next generation (the Johto previews were more than mediocre, plus, the new 100 were mostly overshadowed in-game). All the other times, it was just followed through without any reason to do so.I personally really don't like the anime anymore. I'm very curious about what you think of my point of view. I took a tiny break earlier and I just tried getting into it again, but I just couldn't. Kanto and Johto Ash are by far the only times where the character has been anywhere remotely interesting. He was learning, he still had the generic traits that define him today like the excessive enthusiasm and willingness to help but he had other interesting traits like his cockyness and hotheadness. No, I'm not saying he should be the same character forever, but Ash doesn't develop anymore. The loss in the Kanto league taught him humility (plus, it was uncommon for a Shounen hero to fail) and in the orange islands his character arc with Charizard ended. Then in Johto he was a lot calmer but still retained some interesting traits, and then his rivalry with Gary was concluded in a great way.
The point is that they do NOTHING interesting with the character anymore (besides perhaps his rivalry with Paul in DP). He learns NOTHING from his losses. What did these last few league losses teach him? Nothing. Even his Pokemon seem to have no personality anymore, besides Hawlucha. Where's the bonding phase that Ash had to go through with some Pokemon? Now they love him out of the get-go.
Why do people keep saying that XY is the best season yet? In my honest opinion it's not. It's very predictable and repetitive, and it really doesn't have the excuse that the first two seasons have. Also his original outfit is still the best. And no, I'm not nostalgiafaggotring. Look at it from an objective viewpoint and you'll see the first two seasons are the only times the anime gets anywhere close to decent in regards to characterization and character development (because, let's face it, the plot is shit no matter which season).
But hey, at least people got their flashy fights, right?
Yeah, it was more about story than battles, plus being constrained into only 4 episodes. The only decently long battle was vs. Mewtwo - still, those would be considered among the better ones compared to the anime (especially the first season, where many 'fights' are completely foregone in favor of slapstick humor).Battle choreography in origins?
A bunch of slideshows and a jolteon getting Koed by thunder bolt? Sorry dude but many of origins choreography relied on cut out scenes, if you mean schyter vs onyx in the last slide show before the main slide show we might have an issue here.
Want good choreography out of pokemon? Vs Drake in Orange, vs Vito in johto, vs Harrison Johto, vs Katie in Hoenn, vs Conway in Sinnoh(yes this one is better than vs Paul as it doesn't have 4 fallguys with two from the other side) and vs Shota for leagues.
I'm sorry but Paul fight is a choreographic catastrophe that people put high for the emotional value and type wild playing at a literal bashing fight that stopped having coherence even before it's climax.
Anime garnered toward children can't gave good animation? Excuse me! Have you ever watched PreCure?Some of the criticism here is absurd. How lofty can your expectations be for an anime that is very clearly targeted towards children? It's like when people criticize the games for not doing certain things. Like, no matter how old you are they are still targeted towards kids.
Not only that, but this is serialized programming with no definite end in sight. Nearly every character in serialized fiction undergoes changes and then the slate is wiped clean again because their stories do not end. Comic book fans complain about this all the time as well but there is nothing to complain about. Just really understand what media you're getting into.
Ash & Pikachu are like Mickey Mouse, Spider-man, Tom and Jerry, Scooby-Doo, Batman, etc. You might grow up and still be interested in these characters, but they're never going to grow up with you.
Anyway, there's an interesting theory that Alain's Charizard-X has become unnaturally powerful because of the collected mega evolution energy that's become stored in his keystone, leaving Lysandre to take it from him to power up his Mega Gyarados the same way. Alain would feel crushed that Charizard X's strength wasn't his own and probably give up his trophy to Ash.
I thought this was an interesting and plausible theory but I really hope it isn't, because Alain & his Charizard really did train hard.
I haven't heard of PreCure, but I did love and watch every animated thing Bruce Timm has done including BTAS. The difference with that show is firstly it is episodic -- there's no long term goal even comparable to Ash's. Bruce just wants to fight crime and the bad guys want to end him. Rinse and repeat. The dialogue and writing is ace on that show but that was more because of Paul Dini than anything DC mandated.Anime garnered toward children can't gave good animation? Excuse me! Have you ever watched PreCure?
The old animators of DB doing their best on this franchise and even though we have a slight case of stock footage abuse in this series they always find ways to avert it, heck cure peace had 6 different transformation sequences thanks to her gimmick something unheard of in magical girls, DoReMi is known for its animation jumps and bouncyness through all of its seasons.
Quality is a thing dude, sadly you weren't exposed to it or choose to overlook it, even then that doesn't mean it doesn't exist on children shows, even on cash cow marketing franchises such as PreCure.
Also Tom and Jerry? The kings of slapstick animation, dude I don't know what have you watched of them but outside of reused footages during chases each frame was animated individually to showcase impact, there is very few instances of lazy animation here.
Heck even the Chuck Jones Era that had minimalistic animation gave us gems like "The bear that wasn't" in wich the industrialist take and music don't make us notice the reused footage.
Do you realize that the Arcs of killer Croc, Clayface and Dr Freeze are Batman the animated series original? Even on baby doll, the creeper and penguin goes good we actually have continuity nods aimed to its peripheral demographic? The show actually grew with us during this continuity of the DC universe.
Quality exists in both formats of animation.
Spiderman did do a by the books adaptation without a single fist fight, fuck the censors, and Scooby-Doo is lazy as fuck outside of the movies I can't agree more here.
I stripped myself down from my nostalgia and on technical level most shows aren't lazy, heck I'll always praise Wander over Yonder for giving me bits of animation reminiscent of the Steven Spielberg animation Era with the twist and turn techniques.
This continuity actually lasted for some time, mostly showcased through Batman though.I haven't heard of PreCure, but I did love and watch every animated thing Bruce Timm has done including BTAS. The difference with that show is firstly it is episodic -- there's no long term goal even comparable to Ash's. Bruce just wants to fight crime and the bad guys want to end him. Rinse and repeat. The dialogue and writing is ace on that show but that was more because of Paul Dini than anything DC mandated.
Also LOL @ the idea of continuity in the DCU.
I'll write an FAQ-ish section to answer any generic attack on legit criticism towards the anime:
1. It's for kids, it doesn't have to be good
There is plenty of amazing animation, both in the 3D animatronic and the 2D drawing section, which is outstanding in graphical quality, character immersion, storytelling or multiple of these. Not having any standards with Kid's shows inevitably makes people not demand standards from other shows, which will degrade the quality of the medium as a whole. The lack of quality caused even kids to dislike the show (like me, though I was mainly hating on the main characters/antagonists instead all the other things like I do now) since even they want something good.
2. You're just not the right audience
It's actually much more of a problem than you think - The problem with low-quality writing and cheap animation without any meaningful narrative is that it doesn't appeal to children more, it alienates and frustrates all audiences except children (as mentioned above, even they drop off sometimes). So the show is actually going out of its way to make the older demographic dislike it more.
3. It's necessary to maintain status quo to extend the show
Was Simpsons ruined by the fact that Maude Flanders died? That Selma adopted a child? Or by Barney getting a license to fly a helicopter? As we see in The Simpsons, there is room to develop characters, introduce new staples or even kill off cast members and still keep running (There's still the non-aging characters, but that's fine imo). Even if you think that a developed Ash means you have little room for growth, you could just put some focus on new trainers and their struggles while still having Ash around, sometimes as mentor, as a friend, partner, rival...
Addendum: The reason Comic Books pull reboots is mainly because they're done with a different writer who prefers not running with the current baggage of development or because a series has gone down the gutter and needs a fresh start.
4. The show can't do that, it has to advertise the games and show off the basics
First off all, it fails at doing either - the show puts too little focus on Pokémon team synergy, mechanics such as held items, TMs&HMs, breeding or even battling for it to really show off what you can do and when it comes to basics like type advantage, the show flat out lies about such things (no, you can't circumvent type immunities/weaknesses like that, switch to something with a type advantage for that). I could easily trim a bunch of filler off of the show (regardless of season) and replace it with things that actually exist in-game.