jrrrrrrr
wubwubwub
See my new sig for why this quote of yours is hilariousa person can stop being poor, can they not?
See my new sig for why this quote of yours is hilariousa person can stop being poor, can they not?
That was the point of the clip jrrrrr, I laugh every time I see it. Ironically, that severe comment was not in his prepared remarks lmao. He stuck that in himself.As someone who actually lived in Massachusetts when Romney was a governor, I had to laugh at that clip symphonyx64. Mostly because he sounded like he was trying to convince himself
Or democrats know that Obama can whip Santorum because he has zero appeal to moderates so they're voting him hoping to make him the nominee.Oddly enough, Santorum's lead with democrats is more pronounced than that of republicans in Michigan. Thus, it looks likely that he is winning over some so-called "Reagan democrats"
O.oRE: Deck Knight: I like your insightful posts.
I have actually no clue what you're talking about. Are you talking about after someone drops out, they then support someone? And Ron Paul is the man, even though I agree with only 50% of the things he says and the other 50% is craziness.I love how all the candidates (aka romney and Gingrich) just go to war with each other but as soon as one of. Them wins The other will be super supportive. Santorum is just crazy and I could swear Ron Paul is a hired comedian
No, when it's just Obama vs the other dudeI have actually no clue what you're talking about. Are you talking about after someone drops out, they then support someone? And Ron Paul is the man, even though I agree with only 50% of the things he says and the other 50% is craziness.
Politicians are fantastic actors.Yeah I always found it really bizarre that people would have no qualms with dishing out the rudest insults and the most demeaning rhetoric against each other, but at the end of the debate they would smile at each other and shake hands as if they were best friends (and often they are). It really baffles me that people are just that incapable of being genuine in front of the millions of people that they're supposed to lead and represent.
Politicians are fantastic actors.
lol sorry for the off-topic post, but you MUST have phrased that intentionally. I've never laughed so hard at a political post in my lifeSantorum is surging hard
i honestly don't see this as a problem, it seems to me like you'd want your potential presidential candidate to have a sense of respect and diplomacy for even his fiercest adversaries -- would you rather romney ended debates with a hearty "aye feck off newt you globe-shaped nutball"? candidates are capable of accepting each other as people, they can still be incredibly competitive and acerbic in their fight to uphold their dignity and elbow their opponent off the opposite podium. their in-genuine-ness is actually a vestige of bipartisanship -- and if it's just completely fake that's at least better than unabashed rudeness off and on the debate stage due to conflicting policiesYeah I always found it really bizarre that people would have no qualms with dishing out the rudest insults and the most demeaning rhetoric against each other, but at the end of the debate they would smile at each other and shake hands as if they were best friends (and often they are). It really baffles me that people are just that incapable of being genuine in front of the millions of people that they're supposed to lead and represent.
Santorum is surging hard
it's basically just masturbatory
sourceA top adviser to President Barack Obama’s re-election campaign says Republican presidential candidate Rick Santorum has taken “divisive positions’’ on key social issues.
I apologize if it sounded as if I was treating that poll as 100% viable or conclusive, which is why I inserted "may be in trouble" in my post above. That one poll could be credible though, since Santorum is in a virtual tie with Romney in another California poll. Coupled with the fact that Santorum is being competitive with Romney in ultra-liberal California and Arizona is solidly republican in comparison, it would be feasible to say that Santorum could be more appealing to voters in Arizona. You're correct that Santorum actually increased by 200% according to that poll; I should've phrased it by saying, "Santorum's poll numbers are 300% of what they were 2 weeks ago."I should make a website compiling polls from across the web. Put some google advertisements on it and make bank off of sensationalists who think poll results mean more than the paper they're printed on. No one should put any stock in these polls..
Polls done by telephone of 600 'likely voters' mean very little. Also 10% to 30% is a 200% increase. These words sound really pretty, but it's basically just masturbatory for the lack of meaningful insight that these polls produce.
'Santorum is gaining more attention, so lets make a poll about it, and then call attention to Santorum's performance in a poll, then he'll get more attention, rinse and repeat for maximum redundancy!!!!!!!!!!!111!'