Karxrida
Death to the Undying Savage
Salamence would have been axed regardless of Garchomp's banning, and for it to not be a fallacy you have to prove 100% that something will come of it. You have not provided 100% proof that something (I think you were talking about Lando being broken, but your wording was really shitty so idk) will be broken if Greninja was to be banned, so your argument if fallacious (and would probably still be anyway because you're not arguing against Greninja being broken).The slippery slope argument isn't fallacious if the result is obvious to all parties involved (something else that's staple in the meta becomes the next overpowered centerpiece of this discussion.) See also, gen4 Salamence after Garchomp got the axe. Slippery slope is a fallacy, when it's used for baseless caution- my point is more that the aftermath of banning Gren won't have the desired effect, the same way that most bannings don't have the effects that most people who complain are looking for.
Edit by Haunter: inappropriate language and against the rules.
Last edited by a moderator: