Tiers are pretty much set unless there's serious opposition; MPL is a tour for the community, so I don't mind changing things, but the managers voted strongly in favor of it as a whole over another standard SM slot. As a result, I wouldn't count on it.Sorry to distract from some amazing posts but are the tiers already set/can we do something about bo3 mono? It's already a team tournament, what's the point in making one slot 3 games? It's not a tradition thing since last MPL had a bunch of OMs instead, it's just a way to make one person prep two more teams, and it's incredibly weird to see. The only precedent I can think of is RBY in SPL which is supposed to be bc less competitive or something, but it's not like bo3 eliminates team matchup dynamics and all the other non-monothreat slots don't seem to care about the issue so is there any reason other than "3 bo1 sm mono slots sounded boring"?
Last MPL, we had a bunch of OMs and a lot of people actually disliked a lot of them. Furthermore, excluding "Monotype's OM" Monothreat, no Mono OM is actually active this year. Even Monotype AAA hasn't even had a room tour since SM began.
People like playing and watching best-of-three series, especially when it's an admittedly more matchup-based format like Monotype. It's more interesting as a whole. 3 SM wasn't a "boring" idea, having a best-of-three series is just more entertaining. We also considered a best-of-three with SM / ORAS / BW, but ended up not going with that in the end because it'd be pretty hard to draft for and it seemed like a less appealing option when we considered how to incorporate it into the other seven metagames.
I'm not an expert on NU, so someone else can talk about how it worked or whether it went well or not, but I was told after that NUPL also had a best-of-three slot.
Thanks for your concern!