1. Welcome to Smogon Forums! Please take a minute to read the rules.
  2. New to the forums? Check out our Mentorship Program!
    Our mentors will answer your questions and help you become a part of the community!

More proposals with the way an analysis is shown

Discussion in 'Archives' started by Colonel M, Jan 28, 2010.

  1. Colonel M

    Colonel M I don't suck it's my team that sucks!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogon
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,298
    We were discussing a lot of things the other night about the way the analyses look like. So far, it seems that some people are liking the truncated paragraph idea; however, others have suggested that we try doing more with the Project "while we're at it". This isn't really a big deal, in my opinion, but in here I am going to present what we thought of the other night and hear some thoughts from it in here.

    1) Merging EV and Other Option section

    From Ashley:
    2) Moving "Opinion" to the top and renaming the section "Overview"

    Obi hindsighted this idea to us, and this also felt like a good thing to change. One thing that is for certain: the Opinion section explains the Pokemon briefly on its capabilities and / or strengths. It is, however, near the very bottom of the analysis which can lead a person to be mislead if they read the SET COMMENTS of another set and think "hey Farfetch'd doesn't sound that bad. The person who wrote this had some decent comments with it", for example. I think this is also a good idea and is not very difficult to implement either.

    There is likely more to come within the future, but for now this is the information that we agreed on at the moment. Everyone has a right to sound off on their opinions on it, but these seem easy to adjust and can even be done while Project: Concise is going underway.
  2. eric the espeon

    eric the espeon maybe I just misunderstood
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,694
    Fully agreeing with both, with the length of analysis fitting an explanation of EVs into the SCs is pretty easy and renders the EVs section redundant. Opinion is a misleading term for it's section, Overview is much better.
  3. Philip7086

    Philip7086 Myuu
    is a Tutor Alumnusis a Tournament Director Alumnusis a Site Staff Alumnusis a Team Rater Alumnusis a Battle Server Admin Alumnusis a Smogon IRC SOp Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis an Administrator Alumnusis a Past WCoP Winneris a SPL Winnerdefeated the Smogon Frontier

    Joined:
    Jun 23, 2008
    Messages:
    3,083
    Agree with 1, but don't have any opinions about 2 (haha).
  4. RBG

    RBG It feels like a perfect night to dress up like hipsters
    is a Super Moderatoris a Smogon Media Contributoris a Site Staff Alumnusis a Smogon IRC AOp Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
    Facebook Manager

    Joined:
    Jan 27, 2008
    Messages:
    3,330
    Perhaps this should be moved to main C&C so that others can discuss it as well?
  5. Xia

    Xia aka Lone Gansel
    is a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Nov 2, 2007
    Messages:
    2,464
    As I stated on irc, I can't really see a reason why this change shouldn't be implemented. The EVs section generalizes a lot of what is already mentioned in the set comments, and moving "overview" to the top will help new battlers understand how a Pokemon is used without having to read through the entire analysis to get to this section.
  6. Colonel M

    Colonel M I don't suck it's my team that sucks!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogon
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,298
    I brought it up here first so that the staff at least understands. It will be moved to C&C after I get the "approval".
  7. franky

    franky
    is a Team Rater Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Apr 12, 2009
    Messages:
    2,486
    We should just keep it the way it is. The EV section might be a bit redundant but its a nice location for players to look at what EVs to run or what "other option" EVs to run if you feel like outpacing a certain Pokemon or 2HKOing a certain Pokemon, etc. I know I wouldn't waste my team looking in the set comments, I would go straight to the EV section.
  8. Fuzznip

    Fuzznip Hoo-hoo-hoo-hoo!
    is a Smogon Media Contributoris a Tiering Contributoris a Site Staff Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus
    Mentor

    Joined:
    Mar 3, 2009
    Messages:
    3,302
    The EV section is just a good place to find a "general" EV spread for the Pokemon. Aside from that, it's basically repeating the exact same information that you can find in the SET COMMENTS of the set you're looking at. You can even mention in the SET COMMENTS what EV spreads work instead of scrolling all the way down and looking for it. The EV section isn't the most detailed of places anyway, so I don't really see the point of it.

    Supporting this.
  9. twash

    twash
    is a Site Staff Alumnusis a Team Rater Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Dec 26, 2007
    Messages:
    2,328
    I would prefer to collaborate both the "Other Options" and "EVs" sections into an "Optional Changes"-esque section. I would like to keep a secluded place where we can still talk about any other EV spreads, because there are definitely cases where a Pokemon can run many, many EV spreads for a single set (Blissey, for example), and it gets annoying repeating it over and over for every Set Comments part. I think we need to keep a place to talk about this and other issues concerning natures and what not. (I think this section would be better for talking about things like Adamant vs. Jolly Dugtrio.)

    I like the idea of point 2, but I would warn that it definitely should not become an essay like most things in C&C seem to be becoming nowadays. I think the mentioned section, if changed, should stay short to actually give a short overview and not an essay. I know you weren't aiming or hoping for this anyway, but it is something we should almost certainly keep an eye on due to the oddly long length of analyses now.
  10. Komodo

    Komodo
    is a Site Staff Alumnusis an Artist Alumnusis a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Nov 8, 2008
    Messages:
    4,002
    Myself, I don't see why we use different sections (Team Options, EVs etc). If you look at most of the analyses leaving C&C of late you see most of this merged into the set comments anyway. A lot of the stuff in these sections is pointless repetition and clutter to be honest, in the case of EVs/alternative spreads I believe you could list them in set comments also. If anything, I belive the "Other Options" should be merged with set comments as it is the only thing that isn't really listed for each set. This could be useful in a way, listing support options on support sets and offensive options for attacking sets will make it easier to identify what these options are used for.

    If you think this makes it unreadable or too long etc each set of "set comments" could have smaller subtitles to label these sections or something.

    Some of this is probably a bit irrelevant (and probably a bit of a drastic change) but I would like to share my opinion on the whole structure of analyses.

    As for the opinion section, I believe this should be the only section as an overall "sum up" of a Pokemon's abilites after all set comments have been shown.
  11. Great Sage

    Great Sage

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2006
    Messages:
    6,666
    I support killing off the EVs section; I've never viewed it as useful when the EVs are discussed in the set comments anyways. It'll involve a lot of long, boring grunt work to remove it and making sure no information is lost in the process, but it's not like we have a shortage of cheap labor now.
  12. darkie

    darkie mfw i see alison brie
    is a member of the Site Staffis a Smogon IRC AOPis a Super Moderatoris a Smogon Media Contributoris a Contributor to Smogonis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus
    Public Relations

    Joined:
    Dec 25, 2005
    Messages:
    6,052
    I'm fine with both, but twashley's idea of merging the two optional sections seems attractive as well.
  13. whistle

    whistle
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Smogon IRC SOp Alumnusis a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnusis a Past SPL Winner

    Joined:
    Jan 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,678
    I agree with the second proposal, but I actually think EVs should remain a separate section, whether as [EVs] or Ashley's [Optional Changes]. I look at that section when I'm trying to make an EV spread for a modified set and I want to know some speed tiers for that Pokemon or how many Attack EVs it needs to get important KOs (etc). Yeah, all the information is available in the rest of the analysis, but a separate section combines all of it in a centralized location which means means I don't have to press "more" on 5+ sets and try to find where each mentions EVs. Since lots of Pokemon have varied EVs for different sets, this is an easy way to compare the differences and find what EVs are best for the set I want to use.
  14. Colonel M

    Colonel M I don't suck it's my team that sucks!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogon
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,298
    That could also work for proposal one IMO since EV section feels like "Other Options" but instead of moves it's spreads.

    EDIT: I'm going to adopt Ashley's idea. I like that actually.
  15. Darkmalice

    Darkmalice Like a facepalm, but better
    is a Community Contributoris a Tiering Contributor

    Joined:
    Aug 11, 2008
    Messages:
    1,492
    Ashley's Optional Changes would (hopefully) include the speed tiers and any other optional EV numbers that would net certain KOs or certain survival rates from opposing Pokemon attacks. The main EV sets don't need to have a whole EV section to them; it doesn't take long to skim through an analysis and find the relevant info needed for EV allocation. If the modified set would have the same EVs as one of the other sets, chances are it would perform quite similar to that set (and in which case reading that analysis would be beneficial to the read). I'm in support of these Optional Changes.

    I'm also in support of the #2 proposal (analyses need an introduction).
  16. david stone

    david stone Fast-moving, smart, sexy and alarming.
    is a Site Staff Alumnusis a Smogon IRC AOp Alumnusis a Programmer Alumnusis a Super Moderator Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Aug 3, 2005
    Messages:
    5,150
    One of the benefits of having one section for optional changes, rather than one for EVs and one for moves, is that if all the EVs have already been explained, you aren't compelled to rewrite all of that in the EVs section. This is just a way to re-organize, it's not removing or adding new information.

    I also see no reason for this to be in this forum. C&C seems like the better place for it.
  17. chaos

    chaos
    is a member of the Site Staffis a Battle Server Administratoris a Programmeris a Smogon IRC SOPis a Contributor to Smogonis an Administratoris a Tournament Director Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnus
    Owner

    Joined:
    Dec 18, 2004
    Messages:
    9,478
    Moved to C&C. Transparency guys :)
  18. Colonel M

    Colonel M I don't suck it's my team that sucks!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Contributor to Smogon
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Aug 5, 2007
    Messages:
    4,298
    Sorry, I just wanted to make sure that I didn't have issues with the admins and co.

    Alright, I'd like to hear EVERYONE'S opinion on this now.
  19. EspyJoel

    EspyJoel Espy <3
    is a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Mar 18, 2009
    Messages:
    1,919
    Agree with both Optional Changes section and Opinion to the top. It seems a good idea to not have a section solely on EVs as not much usually goes here, it's usually just repetition of what's been said in each set, and for the second one an overview certainly seems like a good idea so people have a general idea about the Pokemon before they start reading the analysis because at the moment there is a chance that some people may not read the whole analysis and get down to the Opinion part due to the length of many analyses.
  20. Lord Liam

    Lord Liam

    Joined:
    May 16, 2009
    Messages:
    348
    I don't write analysises Marcus, but I do look at the site sets and to me this looks like a great idea.

    I'm supporting this.
  21. Acid Xygnus

    Acid Xygnus

    Joined:
    Jul 31, 2008
    Messages:
    71
    I agree with 1 (put Other Options and EVs together near the bottom), but on opinions... I'd have to see how'd it'd be done. Would we just keep the old opinions sections?

    If we do, keep it where they are at the moment. If not and they become shorter, I'm all in for putting them on top, as it could help to find out what that Pokemon's standard role in a team would be.
  22. Theorymon

    Theorymon AHHHH REAL GOOMBAS!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Smogon IRC SOPis a Contributor to Smogonis a CAP Contributor Alumnus
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 14, 2009
    Messages:
    1,310
    About the Overveiws. If these replace the opinions, I think they may need to be revamped due to being used as "introductions". In fact, the overviews idea sounds much like this old suggestion from Tangerine and aldaron. I'm not sure if thats the guideline we should follow, but I don't think just moving the opinion's to the top will be a good idea without revamping them.
  23. eric the espeon

    eric the espeon maybe I just misunderstood
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a CAP Contributor Alumnusis a Researcher Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Aug 7, 2007
    Messages:
    3,694
    After talking to a few people on #C&C, I think we need a bit more clarity on the EV/OC merge. The way I see it OC should now include all alternate spreads (bar ones which are significant enough to be mentioned in SC or AC), and not have any explanation of why listed spreads are chosen. This explanation of why the standard spreads are chosen should be in AC or possibly SC in certain analyses.

    I'm also not too keen on these changes being listed in this thread as "UPDATE: NEW STUFF FOR FUN!" and "This isn't really a big deal, in my opinion, but in here I am going to present what we thought of the other night and hear some thoughts from it in here.", if the format has changed then new analyses should all follow it without exception. The EV/OC merge in particular is really quite simple with this format, it should only take a few minutes and nothing extra needs to be written (unless the original was missing information or otherwise flawed of course).
  24. Phantom_IV

    Phantom_IV

    Joined:
    Jan 24, 2009
    Messages:
    651
    Glad to know we're appreciated...

    On topic: I agree with both ideas. Moving the opinion to the topic is especially important, as it helps new users differentiate between seemingly similar Pokemon.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)