1. Welcome to Smogon! Check out the Smogon Starters Hangout for everything you need to know about starting out in the community. Don't forget to introduce yourself in the Introduction and Hangout Thread, too!
  2. Welcome to Smogon Forums! Please take a minute to read the rules.

Discussion Near-Universal Moves

Discussion in 'Policy Center' started by Its_A_Random, Feb 9, 2013.

Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.
  1. Its_A_Random

    Its_A_Random The imitated
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,364
    This thread will be moderated to keep discussion focused.

    Near-Universal Moves

    Basically, there apparently is a common belief that outside of UC spamming, most Pokémon in general take "too many matches" in order to become good, assuming the Pokémon was fresh. Usually, it can take a good 5-6 battles on average from my count to get some 3-Stage Pokémon from fresh to fully evolved with DW Ability Unlocked, & by then it is not uncommon to see such Pokémon only have a movepool count to be roughly 9-10 more moves on average than what it had fresh. One of these factors mainly comes down to the fact that you can usually only have enough MC to buy 1-4 moves a battle with each of your Pokémon, & then you have the choice of either buying important attacking/non-attacking moves to boost your fire-power, or invest in staples such as Protect, Substitute, etc. to give your Pokémon some sort of defence & the ability to screw up plays. This is a dilemma that needlessly contributes to slow development, & not everyone has the UC, or wants to ref battles, just to accelerate development.

    Deck Knight came in during the first of the many counter-farming debates on #capasb, & was more struck by this argument about Pokémon taking too many matches to become good. He drafted up a solution to this problem:
    There were mixed views on this proposal, but if there was anything that would be agreed on, that was that this proposal needed a discussion. That is why we are here — To discuss this proposal as to whether this is a good idea or not, any alternatives, any improvements, etc.

    Discussion should focus on the following questions:

    • Would the idea of giving Pokémon near-universal moves for free be a good idea?
    • Could this proposal be improved? How?
      • What moves should or should not be given away for free & why?
    • Is there a better way to help accelerate development other than this idea?
    • Any other issues in a similar vein to this proposal that can be raised?
    ...And any other things I forgot to mention... Which is likely...


    At any rate, keep on topic & keep discussion civil. Otherwise, time to discuss this proposal.
  2. LupusAter

    LupusAter

    Joined:
    Apr 19, 2009
    Messages:
    1,084
    I fully support this proposal for two main reasons.
    First, it will help new players with the handling of defensive strategies, changing freshmon matches from the usual move spam until the one with type advantage/better moves/higher stats wins to something with at least an approximation of strategy.
    Second, removing a part of the MC load needed to get the fundamental defensive moves will help with the perceived issue of counterfarming.
    The defensive moves proposed make sense, but I'm kinda iffy on giving free, high powered STAB moves to Normal types. This doesn't make a great difference, but it's a difference nonetheless, and I feel that for such a proposal to be effective it should give equal treatment to all mons who can benefit from it. On that matter, mons who gain access to the moves upon evolution should get the moves for free when they evolve.
    I believe the proposal is fine as it is, only with Return, Frustration and Round removed from the list.
  3. Objection

    Objection

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,695
    OK, there hasn't really been much discussion on the general idea. It seems that most people agree that some form of this proposal should be implemented. However, it might be worth further discussing which moves should be on the proposal. Failing that, I'll put up a voting thread in which we vote separately for each move.
  4. ZhengTann

    ZhengTann Nargacuga
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    Yeah, I agree that giving those moves isn't a bad idea, since Normal-types aren't really good offensively in ASB, even thought the proposed moves have pretty universal distribution, as stated. But if the main problem is:

    Then why don't we give freshmons a bigger jumpstart? Maybe we can bump freshmons to have more than 3 Egg and TM/Tutor moves (say, 5, maybe) to offer them more versatility. Lupus might be correct about breaking Normalize Skitty, though - so maybe the Council can vote on allowing Attacking Moves (Round, Return, Frustration) and Non-Attacking Moves (the rest on the list) separately.
  5. zarator

    zarator Credits to Mos-Quitoxe for the cute sprite^^
    is a Community Contributoris a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,977
    A possibility could be to give a better headstart for the mons someone gets as their first mons when they register their ASB team.
  6. Dogfish44

    Dogfish44 Banned from 22 Casinos
    is a Forum Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,038
    So apply this, but only to the first 1/2/3 mons the player gets?
  7. Ragnarokalex

    Ragnarokalex

    Joined:
    Jan 7, 2011
    Messages:
    3,994
    I really think that applying this to a new users starting mons is the way to go, it will give new players a leg up, while not power (move?) creeping i guess. Although I think that Double Team is a plenty powerful enough move to be excluded from this list, it will wreck other starter mons that don't have a spread move.
  8. Texas Cloverleaf

    Texas Cloverleaf meh
    is a Forum Moderator Alumnusis a Tiering Contributor Alumnusis a Contributor Alumnusis a Smogon Media Contributor Alumnusis a Battle Server Moderator Alumnus

    Joined:
    Oct 23, 2009
    Messages:
    7,743
    I'm actually liking Zheng Tann's idea here, buffing the number of starting moves to something arbitrary seems like the way to go here. Giving freshmons something like 3 Egg mvoes and 6 TMs or 4 Egg moves and 4 TMs over the current 3/3 seems like a nice clean way to make fresh mons more viable and take a lesser time to build.
  9. TIO

    TIO

    Joined:
    Jul 30, 2012
    Messages:
    742
    I think that Zheng's idea is the way to go, bumping it up to 4/4 sounds like a good idea.
  10. zarator

    zarator Credits to Mos-Quitoxe for the cute sprite^^
    is a Community Contributoris a Contributor Alumnus

    Joined:
    Mar 12, 2008
    Messages:
    4,977
    Yes, or alternatively just raise the number of TMs and/or Egg moves they can select.
  11. Deck Knight

    Deck Knight DK! DK! Donkey Kong is here!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a CAP Contributoris a Smogon Media Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,612
    One problem I don't want to introduce is centralization on the starters, because if we make the policy change only effect starter mons then new Pokemon still have to crawl through that process. The bit about Double Team is duly noted though. If you think Return and Frustration are problems simply because they do have the capacity to be 10 BAP attacks, they might also be worthy of chopping from the list. I don't think Round and Snore have the same problems, and I like Round because of its interesting priority effect in multiple battles.

    In general I think this should apply to all Pokemon like it does Lv25 and below moves. If the Pokemon can learn them, they will have them without expending any MC. If we remove DT, Return, and Frustration from the list I think this will be balanced. Round and Snore might both be special attacks, but they never hit for SE and under normal situations simply don't have the power to be threatening for a large base of Pokemon. All of the Pokemon that would want to use special normal attacks already either get a better attacking option in something like Hyper Voice or Tri-Attack, and the FE ones of course get Hyper Beam. There are only 5 normal types that even break Rank 3 SpA and they are Porygon-2/Z, Togekiss, Aria Meloetta, and Arceus. Skitty and Delcatty are both Rank 2 SpA.

    This would essentially cut the list down to:

    Near-Universal BW TMs:
    Protect
    Round
    Substitute

    Near-Universal BW Tutors:
    Sleep Talk
    Snore

    - - -

    Which I think is a decent basic skillset that gives each Pokemon the ability to adequately defend itself in normal battle conditions, and fallback attacks if disabled/asleep etc.
  12. ZhengTann

    ZhengTann Nargacuga
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    With the edited list above by Deck, I think it looks good enough not to require 2 votes for Attacking and Non-Attacking Moves. Anyway, thus far people are agreeing to the extra startup moves proposal I made, so I'm formalizing it now:

    I picked 5 to replace the original 3 simply because I think 5 is a good arbitrary number - feel free to scale it either way. But I think having slightly more than 3 would already suffice in allowing much more diversity than what we had previously. If we were to allow, say, 10, that might be a bit too much, in my opinion, especially if we're already allowing about 5 free moves to freshmons as per Deck's proposal.



    EDIT @ Deck Knight below: Oh yeah, I forgot about the likes of Eelektrik and Metang. Alright, here's an addendum to my proposal (sheesh why do I have to pull this one from a different thread >_>)

    Again, 15 is proposed to replace 9 based on the scaling from 3 to 5 in my proposal. Should we decide to use another arbitrary number, then we should adjust accordingly.
  13. Deck Knight

    Deck Knight DK! DK! Donkey Kong is here!
    is a Forum Moderatoris a CAP Contributoris a Smogon Media Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    May 27, 2005
    Messages:
    7,612
    Expanding initial Eggs/TMs means its an even stronger disadvantage for mons that start off without Eggs/TMs. Unless it's combined with a proposal to have MC in lieu of those counters I think it would even further disadvantage things like Caterpie/Weedle etc.
  14. Dogfish44

    Dogfish44 Banned from 22 Casinos
    is a Forum Moderator
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Jan 1, 2009
    Messages:
    1,038
    Let's revive this:

    I think we're close to being able to set up a voting slate at last. However, to make this simpler and actually more balanced...

    [box]Proposal:

    The moves listed below cost 0 MC, and may be claimed as part of a mon purchase in addition to the usual selection of 3 TMs, 3 Egg moves and all Level 25 and below egg moves.

    [box]Double Team
    Facade
    Frustration
    Hidden Power
    Protect
    Rest
    Return
    Round
    Sleep Talk
    Snore
    Substitute
    Swagger
    Toxic[/box][/box]

    Firstly, you'll note that I've included every possible universal TM - Council Members will vote on each move individually. This also allows new Pokemon who haven't developed as far to purchase these moves.

    One final question to discuss I reckon:

    Should well-trained pokemon receive a refund on the moves they've purchased?
  15. ZhengTann

    ZhengTann Nargacuga
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    Erm, honestly I think its not the most efficient way to use our resources. It's been observed that there's a pretty solid consensus on which can be in, and which should be out. Maybe if we just group them into 3 categories (Attacking moves, Non-Attacking Moves, Disruptive Moves) where "Disruptive Moves" include the 5 listed in Deck's proposal (read: Facade, HP, Rest, Swagger, Toxic) it would be faster than voting for 13 individual moves. (In case I didn't made it clear, I support the two hyperlinked posts.)

    As for FEs who already bought those slated moves - I'm leaning towards no refunds. For one thing, they might need the MC for another move. For another, we never did refund those who bought Training Items after their prices dropped from 20 CC to 6 CC. The basic premise behind this proposal and discussion thread is to give freshmons a better headstart. Since non-freshmons are already able to hold their own most of the time, I don't see why we should refund the MC.

    I do, however, support the notion that any mons without the Allowed moves of the slated list after Council voting to get them for free. No sense to deny them from older mons who did not have them when you give them out to every fresh LCs.
  16. deadfox081

    deadfox081

    Joined:
    Mar 31, 2011
    Messages:
    4,133
    I haven't actually spoken up much here and it may be too late but I'm actually against handing out these moves to anyone and everyone. RestTalk, Protect, Double Team, Substitute and Toxic are actually some of the more useful and often times necessary moves in ASB. However at the same time they are often neglected by people when building up their Pokemon's moveset. A 30 move mon is far from guaranteed to have these moves as often trainers focus on coverage and other support moves before buying them (especially something like Sleep Talk) and not having these moves can be detrimental in battles and greatly restrict options. Handing out these moves to everyone takes away the risk vs reward when building a Pokemon.

    As I said it might be too late but I don't support the idea of handing these moves out to new Pokemon mostly due to their high level of usefulness in ASB.
  17. Pwnemon

    Pwnemon is a more intuitive player
    is a Tutoris a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributoris a Tiering Contributoris a Contributor to Smogonis a Smogon Media Contributor
    Doubles Co-Lead

    Joined:
    Aug 26, 2010
    Messages:
    4,075
    I'm with df081, there are ways to speed up building a pokemon and this is not it. Having a 54 move gallade in a tournament battle try to protect against an extremespeed combo only to discover it doesn't have the move protect is an essential, and i think beneficial, part of asb
  18. Orcinus Duo

    Orcinus Duo

    Joined:
    Aug 23, 2011
    Messages:
    2,869
    in agreement with pwne and fox
  19. Its_A_Random

    Its_A_Random The imitated
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,364
    Yeah, I kinda have to agree with deadfox on this matter. I mean, we could give them out to "Starter Pokémon" only, but even then that is not a good idea. All the universal moves thing would do is result in essentially baby-sitting the fresh mons & allowing the player to just focus on developing coverage. I mean, it is not too difficult to shell out a couple of MC just for these essentials, & it has never really been a problem, so to speak. Also, no refunds — too much work to worry about, & what if said FE was maxxed?

    Also, can we please not imply that we are going to implement this? Why not just simple "Should we do something to this/what proposal should we implement if at all" vote first? Having a single vote on "What moves should we make cost 0 MC" is a terrible idea, since it makes the implication that we will implement this, even though there is noticeable opposition.

    And with that, any final words before I or another council member forms up a slate?
  20. ZhengTann

    ZhengTann Nargacuga
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    Why did you revive it with bias dogfish :x
    If people disagree with the basis behind Deck's proposal then

    Look back at post #12 (open)
    Or change the numbers (5 and 15) to any other arbitrary number, depending on community feedback in the thread and Council voting.

  21. Objection

    Objection

    Joined:
    Sep 27, 2008
    Messages:
    5,695
    I think ZhengTann is onto something with that post. Presumably the 15 MC thing would apply to Tynamo as well (since technically Tynamo doesn't fall in that category - in fact, no pokemon does iirc, which is why the rule was replaced with one specifically for Tynamo).
  22. Its_A_Random

    Its_A_Random The imitated
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,364
    Yeah, Tynamo is a special case. How about with the bonus 15 MC thing, applying it to some of the 1 CC Bugs as well? Like Caterpie, Weedle, Wurmple, etc., since there is, iirc, nothing with no TM's/Tutor's/Special Moves (Though I might be wrong with this).

    But yeah. We have a special case for Tynamo. How about applying it to other Pokémon in a similar boat if applicable?
  23. ZhengTann

    ZhengTann Nargacuga
    is a Pre-Contributor

    Joined:
    Mar 7, 2012
    Messages:
    2,158
    About the 15 MC part of my proposal - it was added in when Deck brought up the issue concerning LCs like Weedle and Caterpie (just in case you guys really skipped the last 20 posts and jumped to the bottom). If what Obj and IAR said is true (I hadn't joined ASB yet during the implementation of that Tynamo addendum), then perhaps we can go ln a case-by-case basis, to be voted by the Councillors.

    Or we can set a threshold for that, for future's ease of access - any freshmons purchased that has less than 10 TM's/Tutor's/Special Moves may be given 15 MC instead of free moves, to be spent as they wish upon evolution. The reason behind this is that I looked up Marriland, and apparently even Tynamo learns Magnet Rise from Tutors now, so we now have no freshmons at all that would legitimately fall under that category. If we wanted to improve the viability of Caterpies (and Beldum, too, but never mind) I think this would be a good way to go about it. Lastly, such a rule sets a standard for future generations - meaning we don't have to update the damned list every time a new game is released (inb4 Pokemon X equivalent of Weedle comes along).
  24. Its_A_Random

    Its_A_Random The imitated
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,364
    I guess I should throw up a pre-emptive slate for this as well.
    [BOX]Should we make reduce the cost of some near-universal moves to 0 MC?
    Reduce the cost of some near-universal moves to 0 MC
    Do not reduce the cost of some near-universal moves to 0 MC

    Should we increase the number of TM/Egg Moves given to new Pokémon?
    Increase the number of TM/Egg Moves given to all new Pokémon
    Increase the number of TM/Egg Moves given to starter Pokémon only
    Do not increase the number of TM/Egg Moves given to all new Pokémon

    Should we add a special +X MC clause to certain Pokémon other than Tynamo?
    Add a special +X MC clause to certain Pokémon other than Tynamo
    Do not add a special +X MC clause to certain Pokémon other than Tynamo[/BOX]

    And anything else I missed. Imperfect slate is imperfect, but we need to get something about this done ASAP.

    This thread will stay open for a maximum of 48 hours, or less if nobody has anything else to add within 24 hours. If nobody has anything else to add, this will be the slate that the council will vote on.
  25. Its_A_Random

    Its_A_Random The imitated
    is a Forum Moderatoris a Community Contributor
    Moderator

    Joined:
    Mar 19, 2010
    Messages:
    2,364
    Okay, seems like there are no real objections, so let us just use the above slate, & if either option gets implemented, we will work from there. See you all in the vote!
Thread Status:
Not open for further replies.

Users Viewing Thread (Users: 0, Guests: 0)