Competitive Pokemon isn't about having fun? I think that's pretty wrong; of course it's about having fun. You wouldn't be playing if it wasn't fun.
Now, when deciding the rules, it's about fairness and balance. I'm fairly sure most people want Genesect gone (myself included), but my question is, on what basis would the ban be given? Would it be a fair ban? If you consider any one Genesect set, obviously it's not broken, but as a whole, it overcentralizes the metagame by consistently being very powerful and unpredictable whether it's scarf, band, RP, expert belt, and hell, even physical scarf. It's pretty much the premier offensive threat, as if you consider every set as a whole, it has almost no counters.
It's almost like playing without team preview for that one slot, because you never know if your checks or counters are true ones, as it depends on the set. Your opponent can tailor their team specifically to get rid of their Genesect's checks, but you cannot tailor your team to get rid of every single Genesect set reliably without being forced to use a certain subset of pokemon. Since most people are afraid of the RP set and EV their pokemon to give Genesect the attack boost, it might even be viable to sweep with choice scarf iron head or physical RP (lol that'd probably be shitty) after eliminating its checks.
My argument supports the "too versatile" one, which seems like a bad reason to ban, but one pokemon being extremely versatile and consistently very powerful overcentralizes the metagame even if it's not broken. I thought the purpose of tiers was to make as many pokemon as possible competitively viable, but Genesect really just does the opposite. I'm pretty much on the fence about it.
Now, when deciding the rules, it's about fairness and balance. I'm fairly sure most people want Genesect gone (myself included), but my question is, on what basis would the ban be given? Would it be a fair ban? If you consider any one Genesect set, obviously it's not broken, but as a whole, it overcentralizes the metagame by consistently being very powerful and unpredictable whether it's scarf, band, RP, expert belt, and hell, even physical scarf. It's pretty much the premier offensive threat, as if you consider every set as a whole, it has almost no counters.
It's almost like playing without team preview for that one slot, because you never know if your checks or counters are true ones, as it depends on the set. Your opponent can tailor their team specifically to get rid of their Genesect's checks, but you cannot tailor your team to get rid of every single Genesect set reliably without being forced to use a certain subset of pokemon. Since most people are afraid of the RP set and EV their pokemon to give Genesect the attack boost, it might even be viable to sweep with choice scarf iron head or physical RP (lol that'd probably be shitty) after eliminating its checks.
My argument supports the "too versatile" one, which seems like a bad reason to ban, but one pokemon being extremely versatile and consistently very powerful overcentralizes the metagame even if it's not broken. I thought the purpose of tiers was to make as many pokemon as possible competitively viable, but Genesect really just does the opposite. I'm pretty much on the fence about it.