Actually calling balls or strikes with a computerized system is entirely doable with current technologies, even when taking into account batting stance and such. I think no one wants the game to be THAT computerized (like you've previously stated)
The two things that need to happen are:
1) safe/out calls and fair/foul calls. Some of the calls mentioned previously are bad, but the worst call I've EVER seen also happened this year in a Rockies game. Anyone remember this?
The call on this play was out. awks..
2) Umpire accountability. No more spite calls by umpires trying to get revenge on players for their "attitude". The players are payed to perform well and have such expectations to uphold, why don't the umps have the same job risk? Certain umpires go out of their way to initiate confrontations with players and managers and it just ruins the game. Let go off your emotions, you're supposed to be an objective neutral party.
and to the specific point of expanded replay.. It's gonna be incredibly slow because Selig is way to conservative about everything ever... He's an awful commissioner.
The two things that need to happen are:
1) safe/out calls and fair/foul calls. Some of the calls mentioned previously are bad, but the worst call I've EVER seen also happened this year in a Rockies game. Anyone remember this?
The call on this play was out. awks..
2) Umpire accountability. No more spite calls by umpires trying to get revenge on players for their "attitude". The players are payed to perform well and have such expectations to uphold, why don't the umps have the same job risk? Certain umpires go out of their way to initiate confrontations with players and managers and it just ruins the game. Let go off your emotions, you're supposed to be an objective neutral party.
and to the specific point of expanded replay.. It's gonna be incredibly slow because Selig is way to conservative about everything ever... He's an awful commissioner.