Frosty
=_=
Check main thread for discussion and arguments etc.
Sooo
This voting is to decide whether we will create and implement signature items for the evolution mechanisms not covered by the already existing items.
The list of pokemon possibly affected by this is:
(mons that already have sig items were excluded)
How the voting will work: The council shall vote on the following question:
Question: Should Signature Items be implemented for Evolution Mechanisms not specifically covered by the already existing items?
a) Yes
b) No
If "yes" wins, we will implement the sig items, so the result here will be the final decision. Also: we will implement ALL items reasonable. So we don't return to this matter hopefully.
Don't be too worried about the list above, as it is prone to be trimmed anyway. If you have a problem with one (or few) specific pokemon from the list, but want the majority to have specific items, the suggestion is for you to vote "yes" and say you are against creating items for pokemon X, Y, Z and A with reasons. If yes wins we will return to that matter.
Also don't be too worried with the suggestions already floating around. We should do creation and implementation from scratch.
fire away
Rainman Legends
S0L1D G0LD
Frosty
deadfox081
Mowtom
Sooo
This voting is to decide whether we will create and implement signature items for the evolution mechanisms not covered by the already existing items.
The list of pokemon possibly affected by this is:
Burmy --> Mothim / Wormadams (Gender / Cloak)
Tyrogue --> Hitmonlee / Hitmonchan / Hitmontop (ATK and DEF comparison)
Wurmple --> Silcoon / Cascoon (PID, so effectively Random)
Riolu --> Lucario (Friendship, Daytime) - This is less "create an item for lucario" and more "shouldn't lucario have espeon's item too?"
Lickitung --> Lickilicky (Rollout)
Aipom --> Ambipom (Double Hit)
Piloswine --> Mamoswine (AncientPower)
Tangela --> Tangrowth (AncientPower)
Yanma --> Yanmega (AncientPower)
Combee --> Vespiquen (Female)
Pancham --> Pangoro (Dark-Type in team)
Inkay --> Malamar (Upside Down 3DS)
Sliggo --> Goodra (Raining in overworld)
Tyrogue --> Hitmonlee / Hitmonchan / Hitmontop (ATK and DEF comparison)
Wurmple --> Silcoon / Cascoon (PID, so effectively Random)
Riolu --> Lucario (Friendship, Daytime) - This is less "create an item for lucario" and more "shouldn't lucario have espeon's item too?"
Lickitung --> Lickilicky (Rollout)
Aipom --> Ambipom (Double Hit)
Piloswine --> Mamoswine (AncientPower)
Tangela --> Tangrowth (AncientPower)
Yanma --> Yanmega (AncientPower)
Combee --> Vespiquen (Female)
Pancham --> Pangoro (Dark-Type in team)
Inkay --> Malamar (Upside Down 3DS)
Sliggo --> Goodra (Raining in overworld)
(mons that already have sig items were excluded)
How the voting will work: The council shall vote on the following question:
Question: Should Signature Items be implemented for Evolution Mechanisms not specifically covered by the already existing items?
a) Yes
b) No
If "yes" wins, we will implement the sig items, so the result here will be the final decision. Also: we will implement ALL items reasonable. So we don't return to this matter hopefully.
Don't be too worried about the list above, as it is prone to be trimmed anyway. If you have a problem with one (or few) specific pokemon from the list, but want the majority to have specific items, the suggestion is for you to vote "yes" and say you are against creating items for pokemon X, Y, Z and A with reasons. If yes wins we will return to that matter.
Also don't be too worried with the suggestions already floating around. We should do creation and implementation from scratch.
fire away
Rainman Legends
S0L1D G0LD
Frosty
deadfox081
Mowtom
Last edited: