TaB Kana all the way!
DJD's doesn't look like a pokemon and the Bannette evo should be saved for a bannette evo.
DJD's doesn't look like a pokemon and the Bannette evo should be saved for a bannette evo.
Sorta understand what you're getting at but at the same time thinking "What?"That's not what I said....<_<; I said maybe we can send it along with all the other Pokemon and say it is a Trainer that you find on the Routes.
Mystical Ghost Gym Leader from another realm...I like it.Better yet maybe a Gym Leader. Ghost or Psychic leader. Works...
No, Syclant looks like a Pokemon, imo. I'm really amazed that DJD didn't update the art before the poll, it's just so obviously not a Pokemon, and at the same time every teenage n00bs wetdream of what a Pokemon should be (i.e. a Spawn character) that he must know it's going to take all the votes.It's mostly the fact that it looks soo non-pokemon and soo "badass" that people are attracted to it more than something more pokemon-ish. Same case could be said for Syclant.
That's not what I saw on the first Create-a-pokemon art thread. Almost everyone stated that it looked too detailed to be a pokemon or it looked too much like a digimon. If I remember correctly, they said the same things about Soy-Monk's creation.No, Syclant looks like a Pokemon, imo.
But those were sketches and then when changed around and color was added, it looked like a Pokemon. DJD's is already done and has color.That's not what I saw on the first Create-a-pokemon art thread. Almost everyone stated that it looked too detailed to be a pokemon or it looked too much like a digimon. If I remember correctly, they said the same things about Soy-Monk's creation.
People say that Dialga looks exactly like a digimon. That didn't stop Nintendo or anyone from making it an actual Pokemon.That's not what I saw on the first Create-a-pokemon art thread. Almost everyone stated that it looked too detailed to be a pokemon or it looked too much like a digimon. If I remember correctly, they said the same things about Soy-Monk's creation.
Because by the time they started saying stuff like that to Dialga, it was too fucking late. The main point of all my comments was to show that people are more attracted to things that have more details and/or colors. Syclant was one of them until we change it to be more pokemon like.People say that Dialga looks exactly like a digimon. That didn't stop Nintendo or anyone from making it an actual Pokemon.
That is the opinion that's ruining America. "Fuck, John Edwards dropped out? Psh, I'm so not voting this year. GG America, try again in 2012." If you don't like the result for this round, why should that stop you from voting on the rest? So you don't like the base stats, try making a difference in movepool.also i hated the BST choosing Method and thats why i didn't vote and and until then next create a poke i'm gonna be absent from this crap
Dialga is a Legendary. They are subject to slightly different design standards. DJD doesn't even look that much like a Legendary, and we're not even making one.Because by the time they started saying stuff like that to Dialga, it was too fucking late.
I'm fully aware of that thank you very much. Personally I don't know why you're defending the ice ant known as Syclant? I pointed him out because people like Automatic stated that it and few other Ice/Bug runner ups look nothing like pokemon. If you read my first comment involving it, I was talking about why people are attracted to non-pokemon looking things in a pokemon art contest.Dialga is a Legendary. They are subject to slightly different design standards. DJD doesn't even look that much like a Legendary, and we're not even making one.
Why is the marrionette getting the most votes when its essentially a spinoff of Banette that has nothing to do with it, evolutionarily speaking?Man, why is Doug just Dougs getting the most votes?It looks nothing like a pokemon i like the mummy one and the marrionate one
The only difference between Agumon and Charmander is that Agumon has a fat head and no flame on its tail. Seriously, what is this "looks like digimon" crap?I'm fully aware of that thank you very much. Personally I don't know why you're defending the ice ant known as Syclant? I pointed him out because people like Automatic stated that it and few other Ice/Bug runner ups look nothing like pokemon. If you read my first comment involving it, I was talking about why people are attracted to non-pokemon looking things in a pokemon art contest.
Don't look at me as I personally don't think none of them look like digimon. At most they look like something from Yu-gi-oh.The only difference between Agumon and Charmander is that Agumon has a fat head and no flame on its tail. Seriously, what is this "looks like digimon" crap?
Why does Rocko's viking axe make him more Digimon-esque? I don't see why everyone is putting his creation down just because his weapon/arm doesn't look organic enough.The Marrionette looks nothing like Puppetmon, and the only thing remotely Digimon-esque is RockotheTaco's viking, primarily because of the Axe.
Digimon are known to carry recognizable weapons as standardly as theire appendages. (see Angemon, Piedmon, Machinedramon). The only two examples in pokemon are Blastoise's cannons and Farfethc'd's Leek, although I suppose you could make an argument for Magmortar, Rhyperior, and Syclant's "Arm Cannons."Don't look at me as I personally don't think none of them look like digimon. At most they look like something from Yu-gi-oh.
Why does Rocko's viking axe make him more Digimon-esque? I don't see why everyone is putting his creation down just because his weapon/arm doesn't look organic enough.