Separate names with a comma.
Discussion in 'Smogon Premier League' started by LonelyNess, Jan 15, 2012.
yeah gg dude, ggs bigs
so, i think my team subbed me in for butterfreeak, and 199 lives hasn't appeared and i might go offline soon...
Beat Amarillo in a gg
lost 4 games on luck, shame, we had an easy win this week.
oh well, at least we have the boss noodlez back
LETS GO TYRANTS
beat delta 3-0, gg sorry about the freeze :(
that was pretty depressing
this but bigger.
Good job B-Lulz mate
subbed in blightbringer for kokoloko and he beat hanke
yea sorry guys, gg
Just clarifying, we have any number of subs available till deadline for adv match up.
Just waiting on sharks' main player (199 lives) or a sub to play it.
NOOOOOO I just got home I totally woulda played ;_;
Lost to EW. Good game ^_^
Just keeping this at the forefront.
First of all, you guys won already, quit trying to lobby for an unnecessary activity win.
Second of all, http://www.smogon.com/forums/converse.php?u=37944&u2=95669
199 lives has been trying to play Butterfreeak since Monday night. Came on every day for hours, and Butterfreeak kept refusing. He was on all day yesterday, and he was on today as late as 5:38PM EST. And now you guys try to bring the "we have substitutes" card at the end of the day on the last day after our ADVer has to go? That's some seriously shady bullshit.
Yo, not lobbying for an activity win at all relax.
Activity wins are lame as hell.
I just want to get a match done.
Also if you really want to start this the only "shady bullshit" is attempting to paint 199 lives as some sort of obviously active individual who went above and beyond all normal standards to get the match done. He didn't. He made a few vms that butterfreeak responded to. Both were were on irc apparently (you claim 199 lives was, I have logs proving butterfreeak was on).
I don't want an activity win at all, but it's nonsense that you're implying I'm fishing for one. All I want is the match to get done, or, worst case scenario, the match up to be no contested and not an activity loss for us, especially in light of the BS that was the conflict vs. floppy match up.
if he was on today we didn't see him because we had a player ready to go pretty much all day. again i understand butter was a pain to schedule with but i dont think he was entirely at fault since no concrete time was scheduled in the first place.