I keep hearing that Salamence is completely outclassed in OU, but I messed around with him a lot, and I have to say he wrecks teams pretty hard.
I guess the best way to look at Salamence is to compare him to his competition. So who is his main competition? Charizard, Altaria, and Dragonite are the ones that I hear the most so I am just going to go with those ones and compare him across the board. For sake of relevance I am just going to look at Charizard X, not Charizard Y, who has a completely different role.
Comparing Charizard to Salamence is interesting. Looking at the Stats they both have very similiar layouts, both sporting solid mixed attacking stats and a speed of 100. Mixed wise Charizard wins out with 130/130 while Salamence sports 135/110. Charizard also wins in the STAB coverage, Fire/Dragon hitting most of the Meta for neutral (Heatran is the only resist I think?). Salamence has better bulk when Intimidate is factored in and also has a much better movepool, allowing it to hit anything for Super Effective damage with the correct move, outside of Sableye I believe. Obviously 4MSS comes into effect here, but that is why there are 6 pokemon and not just 1 on a team. Salamence also hit harder physically, and if you are running Moxie can run through teams with little to no set-up. Another big selling point for Salamence is that it doesn't take up a Mega Slot, meaning you can run it alongside some of the biggest threats in the tier, Mega-Metagross, Lopunny, Diancie, heck even Charizard. Which brings up another point to remember, though both Charizard-X and Salamence take the same from SR, Charizard's base form takes 50%, and since it is a mega it has to switch at some point to change, meaning unless you want to try sweeping at half health you really need to run roost. Charizard also takes damage from spikes, while Salamence does not.
So Pro's to using Salamence over Charizard:
- better bulk with intimidate
- wider movepool
- less entry hazard damage
- no Mega slot used
- Higher damage output with Moxie
- Ability to hold Items (Choice, Life Orb, Leftovers, Assualt Vest, ect...)
Con's to using Salamence over Charizard:
- STAB's leave something to be desired
- Not as good mixed attacking stats (But really who uses special Charizard-X?)
- Less attack without Moxie, less bulk without Intimidate
So what about Altaria? To be completely honest I have not seen a good Altaria player. It normally dies to Venusaur/Metagross/Kyurem, and I have never had problems with it. But for the sake of trying to be complete I will compare them here. Altaria has much better bulk going for it. 75/110/105 is great. Altaria also has better Typing, Fairy/Dragon being one of the best type combinations in the game. Altaria also has a great ability, whether it is better then Salamence's really depends on the team, but it is a good one nonetheless. Altaria also has an amazing movepool. Salamence on the other hand hits much harder then Altaria. Salamence is also faster then Altaria, and sports a movepool that is just as deep. Salamence is also able to use items, which can make it a much more explosive mon then Altaria. It also doesn't take up a Mega slot, so again lots of options for teammates.
So Pro's of Salamence VS Altaria:
- Ability to hold Items (Choice, Life Orb, Leftovers, Assualt Vest, ect...)
- Higher damage output
- Better speed
- No Mega Slot
Con's
- Less bulk
- Worse typing
So yeah, these seem like they have completely different roles on teams, not really sure why they are compared all of the time.... If someone could post more on this that would be awesome.
And onto Dragonite.
Dragonite is probably Salamence's biggest rival. Same typing, similar movepool, similar attacking stats, Dragonite and Salamence seem like they are brothers. Salamence's biggest draw over Dragonite is more power, and greater speed while Dragonite sports more bulk. These guys really fill different roles on teams, where Dragonite is a bulky tank, Salamence is a fast cleaner. This was probably the biggest debate back in Gen V over who was better, but I feel like they are different enough that it really doesn't matter. Not much really to add to that.
So in the end the Pro's of using Salamence:
- No Mega slot used
- Fast
- Wide movepool allows a multitude of sets
- Hits really hard
Con's to using Salamence:
- Secondary STAB sucks (Nothing even decent in that awesome movepool)
- Not as bulky
So in the end I don't really get the comparisons of these mon's. Charizard is the one that Salamence contends with the most, and I already pointed out what would make you use him over Charizard. Overall I think people just see a DD dragon and fail to look at the whole package, there is a reason Salamence was Uber for a while. Granted this is my opinion, and others are welcome to disagree but I think Salamence is a very versatile mon, with a lot going for it.