If anyone starts a nuclear war, it will be a dick move, and because of the Russian oligarchy throwing a temper tantrum because they don't get their way. And cyberattack counters will likely consist of counter cyberattacks or helping any rebels in Crimea and Ukraine, not an actual bombardment strike on Russian soil. The Kremlin is not going to declare war on the U.S. because of that, let alone start a nuclear war, unless they are dicks. If she or the military did something so foolish, you and your fellow Trump supporters would have to wait in line, because me and other anti-war progressives would want wring her neck or the generals responsible, since we sure as hell don't want a war!http://thehill.com/policy/cybersecurity/293970-clinton-treat-cyberattacks-like-any-other-attack
"
“As president, I will make it clear that the United States will treat cyberattacks just like any other attack,” the Democratic presidential nominee said. “We will be ready with serious political, economic and military responses.”
Pretty sure any US Russia military war goes nuclear.
I mean you can critique whatever sources you want but the truth is Hillary = WW3 with russia.
it was ecuador because Assange is under investigation for exploiting an 8 year old child from the embassylol, assange's internet got cut
gee I wonder who could be behind that? :^)
1. Defcon.com isn't real, lmafo and 2. Anthony Weiner is not running for president so I don't see how quoting a speech of him makes anybody a hypocrite regarding current candidates and as hilarious as the Great Carlos Danger is, all the sexting he's done has been consensual, between adults. The exception would be the one case where he was chatting with a 15 year old (lol, get some help carlos), but that's a legal gray area because the girl said he never sent her any pictures.Just putting this out there, Anthony Weiner was caught sexting teens. So if you think his word is valid, please don't be a hypocrite regarding Trump.
gee that sure isn't suspicious timing at all! what a coincidence!it was ecuador because Assange is under investigation for exploiting an 8 year old child from the embassy
The practice of bird-dogging involves asking Trump questions in front of reporters. Domestic terrorism? We say Trump supporters are violent because they are the ones beating up the bird-doggers. Do you even the read the articles you post? Do you read anything?http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...rganizations_to_beat_up_trump_supporters.html
Inciting domestic terrorism to win an election. The DNC is awful. We know that the left makes race relations bad on purpose to try to win votes, and here's more proof. How can anyone vote for Hillary in good conscience? Vote third party.
Oh yeah and the NC firebombing too. And they say trump supporters are violent LMAO
The dnc raised $13000 (already) to help them reopen a field office in North Carolina (on phone so can't link article). Blaming the dnc for one persons action and insinuating democrats are more violent because of this one incident is kind of like saying we should ban Muslims because of the Orlando shooting. Illogical and reactionary.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...rganizations_to_beat_up_trump_supporters.html
Inciting domestic terrorism to win an election. The DNC is awful. We know that the left makes race relations bad on purpose to try to win votes, and here's more proof. How can anyone vote for Hillary in good conscience? Vote third party.
Oh yeah and the NC firebombing too. And they say trump supporters are violent LMAO
Yes, it's definitely the US setting up the man who is fleeing from rape charge allegations who is no more than a figurehead at this point. It is definitely in the US' interest to risk activating the dead man's switch he has which will release everything he is withholding at once apparently (totally doesn't have an agenda by withholding documents btw).gee that sure isn't suspicious timing at all! what a coincidence!
I assume you are being facetious, but politics. As of right now the Democrats are polling slightly ahead in both the presidential election and the North Carolina Governors election (mostly due businesses are pulling out of NC cause the discriminatory bathroom laws / other anti-LGBT stuff that was in the same bill but got very little media attention), and the NC Senator race is essentially a 50/50 right now (republican incumbent is polling slightly ahead). Throwing $13,000 to the republicans to show "we don't condone violence", rather than just say it mitigates any public backlash against the democratic candidates while also making them look like not dicks, which is a pretty important distinction to make when the person at the top of the opposing party's ticket has managed to convince everyone he is a huge dick (by being one).Why didn't the DNC give $13,000 to literally anyone else other than people who will try to continue to discriminate against LGBTQ people and persons of color?
I'm worried about this happening regardless of who wins. There are actually a lot of parallels between infrastructure attacks and bio-war, where the state actors who can undoubtedly do so have refrained from it for fear of retaliation, and terrorist groups who can conceivably do so are considered a similar or bigger threat because they don't have anything to lose.With the tensions between the US and Russia to the point there will be World War 3, don't be surprised if our power grid gets attacked Amerigeddon style in the near future.
You can disagree without reverting to "I hate you", which just encourages people to stonewall and retreat even further into their opinions. At the end of the day everyone does have common ground in that the care about the outcome of this election. You can say "X is wrong because Y and Z" without starting a flame war.Tangentially but not unrelated: "common ground" tends to be a myth of false equivalency that contends that two arguments are of equal merit and should be treated equally. This is how we get to where we are now where blatant fascist white nationalism is the representative brand of the GOP and we're sitting here talking about it like "there's a lot of animosity here we should try to treat each other with respect and intellectually debate why black people arent subhuman and how trans people are in fact not disgusting corruptions of morality."
I could ask the same of Trump supporters. If most Trump supporters would just jump ship, me and every other independent who doesn't like Hillary would have that option.http://www.realclearpolitics.com/vi...rganizations_to_beat_up_trump_supporters.html
Inciting domestic terrorism to win an election. The DNC is awful. We know that the left makes race relations bad on purpose to try to win votes, and here's more proof. How can anyone vote for Hillary in good conscience? Vote third party.
Oh yeah and the NC firebombing too. And they say trump supporters are violent LMAO
You know what, you're right - why would the DNC raise money to rebuild the North Carolina GOP field office? Gee, I dunno... Maybe it's because they're HUMAN BEINGS?The DNC raising money to rebuild the office could just as easily be reinterpreted as an apology and a pay off rather than trying to state that violence isn't cool. Questioning of the motives of disavowal goes back to your earlier analogy of ongoing islamophobia taking the form of "well more Muslims should disavow terrorist acts". Money isn't an apology and speaking of which if it's totally okay to stop trafficking business in the state because of the Republican party's platform therefore costing real financial problems to it's people, then WHY in the FUCK would you then turn around and donate to that self same party.
The ONLY thing to gain in this pr move is self congratulation and a rhetorical token of superiority. It does not do anything to win people over who were going to hate the DNC regardless and is actively beneficial to those who wish to do and have done large swaths of people tangible harm. It's a disgusting charade.
Tangentially but not unrelated: "common ground" tends to be a myth of false equivalency that contends that two arguments are of equal merit and should be treated equally. This is how we get to where we are now where blatant fascist white nationalism is the representative brand of the GOP and we're sitting here talking about it like "there's a lot of animosity here we should try to treat each other with respect and intellectually debate why black people arent subhuman and how trans people are in fact not disgusting corruptions of morality."