• Check out the relaunch of our general collection, with classic designs and new ones by our very own Pissog!

NOC Animal Mafia ~Game Over~

Status
Not open for further replies.
When over 50% of town including conf townies agree on a lynch order and you go against it and get obvtown lynched instead you are undermining town and if you are mafia you'd be doing exactly that, self preservation without resolving the poe which you are a part of
 
Like seriously. What are you on to be in a world where earlio was obv town. Likely town, I agree. But obviously town? What game have you been playing.


Anyways, you logic is ridiculous and isn't even worth retorting to. When anyone can see why that's a terrible argument
 
This doesn't explain why Jalmont did what he did and frankly it's entirely possible now that one of Jalmont/FH wins this thanks to the other one misplaying hard. Perhaps there is a deep scum, perhaps it is Epik, but why the fuck would we go after them when we have slots being anti town to go after instead ?
 
Jalmont viewing thread at end of day and not changing his vote, then ignoring me calling him out is admittedly even more sketchy than FH thinking that lynching Earlio over himself is pro-town play though
 
Dude. If your thought process is that allowing yourself to be mislynched is good.

If your thought process is that two unconfirmed vts with questionable plays are confirmed town.

Then it's probably better for 3 of us tha you don't have a vote.
 
see you are clearly misrepresenting my position

You refuse to let town go through with the lynch order you were a part of, that is imo anti town, but maybe in your view if you are somehow town you thought you'd get the next best lynch instead. Where we have a problem, is when this lynch is not even part of said lynch order, now THAT is just going against the collective effort to solve the poe.

Also Epik/Proph obviously are not confirmed town, I am, and if I had a vote I would not vote any of the two because we have people who :
a) were part of the lynch order I believed to be correct last cycle
b) both blatantly prevented said lynch order to be followed

What you've done did not help town and I'm really saying this in the eventuality that you are town.
 
I'm not at all. I think you just fail to see how silly your argument is.

It boils down to "follow what this person says even though you disagree with them and know it's wrong and may let town lose"

Compared to what I'm saying which is that mafia is a game which requires analysis and participation and in this game letting yourself die is always going to be the wrong move because when alive you can push your own reads and try to win the game. Because blindly trusting someone else's reads and lynching people you know for 100% town is stupid as hell.
 
see you are clearly misrepresenting my position
Click to expand...

I'm not at all. I think you just fail to see how silly your argument is.
Click to expand...

You refuse to let town go through with the lynch order you were a part of, that is imo anti town, but maybe in your view if you are somehow town you thought you'd get the next best lynch instead. Where we have a problem, is when this lynch is not even part of said lynch order, now THAT is just going against the collective effort to solve the poe.
Click to expand...

Compared to what I'm saying which is that mafia is a game which requires analysis and participation and in this game letting yourself die is always going to be the wrong move because when alive you can push your own reads and try to win the game. Because blindly trusting someone else's reads and lynching people you know for 100% town is stupid as hell.
Click to expand...

:pikuh:
 
Whatever. This whole thing is nai and it doesn't matter if the dead person doesn't understand what he's saying.

In other news I'm going to try and finish the proph iso tonight
 
Jalmont said:
i would err on the side of more PRs than vanilla. i don't think mechanically speaking the last mafia has to be a VT claim. pretty much every single claim in this game is non=alignment indicative anyways.

i dont know i dont see why mafia FH would frame his scumbuddy with a faked redirect that just seems like a Poor decision. at least it was a decision that was not communicated at all. i guess i would see the counterargument being FH's weird response to that behavior where he started scrambling to defend xnad in a very odd way.

the mafia being clueless about the persuade would make sense with earlio's behavior, seeing that he took p[retty much the same line as teammates knights and aubisio regarding the persuade. it's just a matter of whether you believe all 3 would do the same thing and make a big deal about it.

don't rea;;y understand how earlio goes from "I also cannot possibly see Jalmont being mafia with how the team is set up" in 2182 to my best vote is jalmont in 2187. thats kinda strange methinks

dont read too much into this though i'm obviously just tunneling at this point mainly out of laziness/unwillingness to go back to why i think 3pk is town and proph as well to some extent. voting me is still fine too.
Click to expand...
Wasnt gonna point this out until jalmont made a response just to test his response but jalmont did give out his general thought process as to why his vote was on earlio.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top