earl
(EVIOLITE COMPATIBLE)
I think the important thing here is that he has provided sources, you haven't. Your claims are unsubstantiated while he has sources backing him, as biased and fake as they are apparently. He's calling you out for your bullshit, not your sources. Which you haven't provided in the first place. That's not hypocrisy.One, you're a hypocrite. You've been acting the same way over the shit you disagree with that I brought up. You can drop the baby tantrum now, I'm just saying, don't take what you can't dish. Two, yea I do think The NY Times is fake news. The Kavanaugh shit over the weekend that has been continuing, mind you, is pretty biased and damning. I would like to say I have reason to believe the paper is not reliable. They legit made a false story about not only a new sexual assault allegation (although even I can't call it that because there's no witnesses, and the victim even doesn't remember such an event), but also an old one dismissed long ago front page news. Not the fact that the last person that was able to "corroborate" Blassy-Ford's story just stated that she was pressured by her and her allies to lie. Yes, I am naturally extremely skeptical of them because it's been evident that they're simply pushing a narrative at this point.
Of course you can provide sources and then you guys would be able to play the "you're a hypocrite" game on an even playing field.