Search results for query: *

Vote: Nay Corrected formatting

oh my god i wasn’t around also hell no i vote nay blazade there is zero reason for you to feel more comfortable with saber than ap

If we don’t decide on a chancellor here, does that mean they get randomly appointed? I can’t imagine we’d extend the day phase infinitely.

I don’t think they’re hitler, at worst they read as potential anarchist to me but i also don’t believe the anarchists can do much with the rate this game is going at

i’m pretty comfortable with ap

good afternoon <3 i’ll be nominating Carl The Turtle as chancellor. I’m interested in AP’s scumreads - i would lump Evie in the same pool as Munchy (which for me is people I don’t feel good about, but also don’t feel terrible enough to want to focus rallying a vote on). I’m curious as to why...

if anyone is particularly interested in chancellor please yap <3 i have a flight day after tomorrow so tomorrow’s a lot of prep for me, i’ll be sporadic but should be able to check in within a reasonable timeframe

DING DING DING 2 liberals!!

we should not be having 3 votes total in a 10 player game

i need a mafia term wiki so bad lmao i learn something new every day because the vote count is horrifyingly low, Vote: No Vote

i’d imagine this is so that chancellor gets four fascist policies? the likelihood of a singular liberal policy being taken out randomly is rather low (i am no math person but if the math is as basic as i think it is that’d be 20%)

my apologies for having negative presence yesterday :row: work has been rough

oh the way i fully thought i spoke okay yeah i do not agree with the fairy vote so Vote: No Vote if we absolutely have to start looking at people i’d far rather look at the people not contributing at all as compared to those who are present and posting I would assume it was 4:1 since i...

glad you’re okay :) i would agree that as of now it’s legislation focused - which makes it painful to try and read literally anyone as of now considering things are… rather low effort? with the exception of blazade i would say this is a bit of a sleepy thread. also i am very much not opposed...

des: she feels town. she’s been pretty consistent, and while not the most helpful in her questioning, it feels on brand from what i know of her a fairy: similar story, though i reeeeeeally hate the acknowledgement of ck’s inactivity before voting ck anyway. carl: also has read town to me this...

yes, sorry! i only saw the question after the day ended. my opinion would also have been unhelpful, considering i would have side eyed you at the time for keeping your vote on CK at the time while agreeing the bandwagon felt ill-spirited. let me pull up the wagon rq

good “morning” :blobuwu:

also safe flight <3

if the goal is simply to pressure the slot this is excessive. Vote: No Vote Call me a staller, but we’ve already established we can work through this without voting people off just yet - while this is a hindrance, we’re ultimately exactly where we expected to be and this bandwagon is not...

this vote feels bandwagon-y, and i do believe fascist ck would go about “fascist-ing” in a more optimal manner than just disappearing entirely. i think something is genuinely wrong irl because this just. does not add up. while it is unhelpful that they haven’t been around, we have made...