Search results

  1. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    You said that your experiences indicated that there was a distinction between romantic and sexual attraction. That is a new model (i.e the split attraction model) of sexuality. It was literally invented in the last 10 years. That is what the post that you were responding to was talking about - a...
  2. Crux

    vonFiedler's Big Album Tier List - Girls, Girls, Girls

    Glad to see you’re improving as a person
  3. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    1) I go into the distinction between sexual and romantic attraction in more detail in this post and in the replies to the original post. Essentially, the same logic that applies to the distinction between romantic and platonic attractions applies to the distinction between romantic and sexual...
  4. Crux

    Was anyone abstinent?

    Sacri'
  5. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    I suppose by this point I should not be surprised to get this kind of response to a post that literally just said cishets are cishets but here we are. To clarify, as it appears necessary, I said nothing about universally excluding ace and aro people in general. In fact, I specifically said that...
  6. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    it is profoundly unclear as to whether you read anything I said
  7. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    I said nothing about how we should treat asexuals. I just said they weren't inherently LGBT. They should obviously be tolerated and accepted. No clue where you got the rest of this comment from what i said lol
  8. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    This does not respond to any of the points I made about why asexuals and aromantics are not inherently LGBT. Regardless, this response clearly makes no sense. The point is that chasteness (which is not merely historical but still reified (how do you have a concept of slut shaming being the...
  9. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    Asexuals and aromantics are not inherently LGBT. If you are LGBT and asexual or aromantic, then you are LGBT because you satisfy those criteria independent of your asexuality. If you assume the existence of the split attraction model that allows for such distinctions, then you also acknowledge...
  10. Crux

    The Well #62 - Theorymon

    Pale Fire is also my fav novel, rank the Nabokov ouevre
  11. Crux

    Serious American Politics

    Maybe you would have realised the reference to God in paragraph 3 was sarcastic if you had read the rest of the article
  12. Crux

    Serious American Politics

    Myzo has actually personally doxed 15 fascists, 8 Proud boys, 19 TERFs, 7 white supremacists, and a partridge in a pear tree
  13. Crux

    Serious Political Correctness and Race

    There is no such thing as a right wing Marxist and Atha has very clearly not actually read Marx
  14. Crux

    Serious LGBTQ+

    I was surprised to find that my earlier post about bi lesbians proved controversial, so here is a fuller explanation of why there is no such thing as a bi lesbian, and why the concept is actively harmful to both lesbians and bisexuals. As an aside, most of this analysis also applies to bisexual...
  15. Crux

    A very Punny Thread™

    Lopunny Kicks
  16. Crux

    Smogon Tour 30

    Eo Ut Mortus you should sign up for this, you might have a chance!
  17. Crux

    vonFiedler's Big Album Tier List - Girls, Girls, Girls

    what kind of homophobia encouraged you to put the fame monster below born this way?
  18. Crux

    Serious Sex Work (No Links)

    I don't disagree with this and would support some form of decriminalisation. I just don't think decriminalisation by itself is sufficient.
  19. Crux

    Serious Sex Work (No Links)

    This post is a bit weird. I don't really disagree with anything you've said about how some women find it empowering, nor do I disagree that they are often instrumental in sex work activism. I am certainly not saying that the women themselves are responsible for human trafficking. None of this...
Top