There are over 15 different type-based rosters and about 10 other rosters based on other factors. I'm trying to find a way to represent these without being overly redundant and page-cluttery. Have any ideas?Extremely well organized and easily browsed. Thank you for doing this.
What I would change for those who begin using that page for reference and had no prior knowledge is specifying the specialty teams or at least doing more to indicate what they use.