Not to create drama, but this is a pretty disappointing answer on multiple levels. If this ruling were to actually exist, I would have to go through the following process:
1) Drop Fighting-type Gym and all current challenges.
2) Train up for Grass-type Gym qualifiers.
3) Participate in Grass-type Gym qualifiers.
4a) Make an arena for Grass-type Gym (presuming I won).
4aII) Lead Grass-type Gym.
4b) Reapply for Fighting-type Gym (presuming I lost).
4bII) Participate in Fighting-type Gym qualifiers.
4bIII) Lead Fighting-type Gym (presuming I won).
That is a stupidly long process for a Gym leader who would be perfectly content with leading the Fighting-type Gym while going through qualifiers. Your ruling is basically a game of chicken, "Will current leaders drop out of their gym? This ruling should put on enough pressure to keep them in." If you want the answer to that game, yes, I would drop out of Fighting-type Gym if I need to. And that's not a very fun nor constructive game to play.
You can't think of any situations where you'd choose one leader instead of two, huh? What about
Fairy Qualifiers, where you literally tested three people and then chose zero of them. All three would have been fine; sure they made mistakes, but give me a gym leader who doesn't. In that case, you chose zero instead of one. The same thing happened recently with
Poison Qualifiers. The Gym Committee has made it clear that it is not a goal to fill up all seventeen gyms, valuing quality over quantity. And I do appreciate that. I just don't see how this ruling you've proposed coincides with that goal
at all. What if the other qualifiers for the Grass-type Gym don't pass the standard? Are you suddenly going to lower your standard to let them in? I don't see the parallel.
To further this, you
specifically broke this rule in the past, Frosty. Not only did you apply for the Ice-type Gym in September 2015, but you were awarded it in October of that same year. Not only that, but you ran the Fire-type Gym until January of 2016, almost
three months later. This happened while you
simultaneously ran the Ice-type Gym, accepting your first challenge on November 17th of 2015, meaning you ran
two gyms for over two months.
So how am I supposed to take this "new ruling" when there is such blatant favoritism being enforced? Is there a reason Frosty was allowed to run two gyms, while I can't even participate in the qualifiers of one while running the other (which Frosty did as well). Is it because the name "Frosty" and "Ice" go well together? Is it because "Frosty's the best trainer in ASB," and therefore can handle it, while I am unqualified to handle it?
I don't know and I don't particularly want to know the answer to those questions. All I'm asking is that these points are heard out and thought on. I have faithfully run the Fighting-type Gym for
three years now, making me one of the four oldest gyms in this game (Dogfish, zarator, Maxim). It was my goal entering in to get the Grass-type Gym (my favorite type), but it was already taken at the time. So I settled on, and really enjoyed, the Fighting-type Gym. But now that I feel ready to try going back to my original goal, I'm being stopped by a ruling that is inconsistent and ill-thought out. So please, consider these points and get back to me.