This happens way too often. Like, way, way too often. At least I'm not the only trans person in the UK to not leave the house often, I guess?
This happens way too often. Like, way, way too often. At least I'm not the only trans person in the UK to not leave the house often, I guess?
You will allways be the goat my man. Tsuuu@ that post above mine, ily maya
been thinking a lot recently and i feel perfectly fine being me, i think. i don't think i need to run away to be momo online, i don't think i need to be anyone but me. i feel like ive come completely to terms with who i am, if that makes sense
i want to use my birth name, leilani! i am done hiding under this online one. one day, ill be able to name change to lei, but its gonna be unfortunately a long time, which sucks... i gotta step up my game and get my grind on if i wanna get the reqs to be myself! hopefully my art can take off or something soon. thank you all for being friends to me while i figure my own identity out, even if i guess its not too far off from how i was to begin with.
and as an update to my old post; i still prefer they/them pronouns, being nb feels so nice for me!
You're wrong. You're welcome here!Probably not the place for this, but I'm an ace. So hi all.
Well, hello there.You're wrong. You're welcome here!
I'm not sure how well the historical 'chaste' (as in: not expected to fuck anyone until marriage at which point you do it a ton, except there's some relaxed norms for guys and some wildly varying norms around what breaks chasity and what not) can be matched with asexuality-as-modern-concept, and even if they're the same your argument comes down to 'being ace was accepted a hundred years ago, therefore it is accepted now'.
I can't say I have a real strict guideline for what counts as 'queer' and what doesn't (I used to, then I realized that's not a practical way to approach these matters), but erring on the side of inclusion or letting communities decide on their own norms themselves doesn't seem like a terrible thing. I think both criteria suggest at least somewhat more acceptance than what's being shown here.
you have any tips on the voice training thing? :eyes: (gz on the almost-gf too!)Talking about my journey as a reidentified person at work has been well received by everyone I've told. Managed to find another new LGBT employee and we've been friendly since. Things have been going really well. Regardless of the pandemic pushing everything offline I've been trying to foster more connections with IRL LGBT people, and it's a breath of fresh air.
Had my second voice training appointment - down to D#3 now, we'll see if I can get it any lower.
May or may not have a girlfriend. She's a girl I met at uni. Neither of us have brought up the word gf directly yet, but there was a cheesy confession. She keysmashes when I say she's cute. She's got me head over heels and it feels amazing.
I said nothing about how we should treat asexuals. I just said they weren't inherently LGBT. They should obviously be tolerated and accepted.What is or is not 'inherently LGBT' doesn't matter, the only practical, relevant question is: "How do we, the handful of people frequenting this single thread on the smogon dot com forums, interact with asexuals" and the response pretty overwhelmingly seems to be 'accept and/or tolerate these people'. There's like two people agreeing with you in the first place, and you're the only one who doesn't agree to disagree.
You can stand on the sidelines and shout that we're doing LGTBQ activism wrong or fail to appreciate the subtle historical nuances of 'chasteness' or whatever, but the real simple fact is that a good 90% of this thread doesn't really seem to be on your side. If you can't make them change how they respond to people saying 'hi i am ace', then this entire conversation is kind of pointless, right?
(especially because 'who do we include in our communities' is a very subjective and emotion-driven question in the first place so unless you have some incredibly practical arguments it's hard to change people's minds on it)
I said nothing about how we should treat asexuals. I just said they weren't inherently LGBT. They should obviously be tolerated and accepted.
No clue where you got the rest of this comment from what i said lol
it is profoundly unclear as to whether you read anything I saidCool, glad we both agree on the matters of actual importance, and only disagree on how we define a couple of terms. That's nice to see! :)