Maybe we define "best pokemon in the tier" differently. For one, i doesn't mean "most used pokemon in the tier". The tier is chock full of fairy and bug types not because they are objectively better than aegislash, but because 7th gen introduced a lot of new fairy and bug types, and there's a tremendous amount of "shiny new toy syndrome" going onIs it just me or does it seem like if Aegislash were actually the best pokemon in the tier, the metagame would not be chock full of fairy and bug types?
"Man, Aegislash is just so overbearing, guys!"
"I know what to do. Let's fill our team with fairy and bug types to counter him!"
...said no one ever. What this actually signifies is that Aegislash, while good, is not at the moment having a particularly large influence on the metagame and especially not on teambuilding. Like November Blue said, Aegislash is superglue right now, not centralizing.
It's a strong anti-meta defensive check that will do some amount of damage to something on your team before it goes down. That's all.
I think Pheromosa, Buzzwole, Golisopod, Magearna, and the Tapus are more than just "shiny new toy syndrome". Besides, when it comes to OU, it makes no sense to even talk about what's "objectively better" than what, especially when the Pokemon are of different types. You might say that Kyogre is "objectively better" than Politoad, but it doesn't even make sense to say "Mega Diancie is objectively better than Mega Venusaur". 7th Gen introduced a lot of new fairy and bug types, which are being run to resounding success in spite of the presence of Aegislash.Maybe we define "best pokemon in the tier" differently. For one, i doesn't mean "most used pokemon in the tier". The tier is chock full of fairy and bug types not because they are objectively better than aegislash, but because 7th gen introduced a lot of new fairy and bug types, and there's a tremendous amount of "shiny new toy syndrome" going on
It's only been about two days since SuMo's launch. In the same way it can be said it's too early to tell if Aegislash will be centralizing, it can be said that it's too early to tell that it won't be centralizing. Cool your jets a bit and wait for the meta to settle down.What that tells me, at least, is that Aegislash is (a) not centralizing the metagame around itself and (b) not the biggest factor going into team creation at the moment.
Maybe we define "best pokemon in the tier" differently. For one, i doesn't mean "most used pokemon in the tier". The tier is chock full of fairy and bug types not because they are objectively better than aegislash, but because 7th gen introduced a lot of new fairy and bug types....
I'm not disagreeing with you about Aeglislash, but "shiny new toy syndrome" does not mean that people are only using x because it's new, it means that x has higher usage because it's new. I think that pretty clearly applies to a lot of 7th gen pokemon, and Aegislash is thriving as a result. But all in all, I think we agree with each other...I think Pheromosa, Buzzwole, Golisopod, Magearna, and the Tapus are more than just "shiny new toy syndrome". Besides, when it comes to OU, it makes no sense to even talk about what's "objectively better" than what, especially when the Pokemon are of different types. You might say that Kyogre is "objectively better" than Politoad, but it doesn't even make sense to say "Mega Diancie is objectively better than Mega Venusaur". 7th Gen introduced a lot of new fairy and bug types, which are being run to resounding success in spite of the presence of Aegislash.
What that tells me, at least, is that Aegislash is (a) not centralizing the metagame around itself and (b) not the biggest factor going into team creation at the moment.
It isn't centralizing AT THE MOMENT, right now. Yes, it very well might be in 2 weeks or a month, particularly depending on what else gets banned. I agree 100% on the wait-and-see approach, but there are also a lottttttt of people in this thread who are trying to stigmatize it already without knowing the first thing about what the Sun/Moon meta will look like when the dust settles. Everyone is focusing on Pheromosa at the moment, but we could be in for the Zygarde show when all is said and done.It's only been about two days since SuMo's launch. In the same way it can be said it's too early to tell if Aegislash will be centralizing, it can be said that it's too early to tell that it won't be centralizing. Cool your jets a bit and wait for the meta to settle down.
Think Taunt+3 attacks Tapu / Agility Thund / M-Mane / Taunt or CM Tapu Lele /Scarf User (beast Mode UB/Lando whatever) / Offensive Rocker. Cool team idea. M-Zam can replace M-Mane if Aegi gets banned.I really like how you can just Choice Scarf physical giants like Kartana/Phero. and Beast Mode to sweep/clean-up with. Choice Specs Psyshock and M-Metagross under Psychic Terrain also deeply wound most teams, and Choice Band Hoop-U/Genesect really complement offensive teams. I am impressed with some of the new release and its great fun so far!
Also I think Tapu-Koko / Thundurus / M-Manetric, when it is released, will be a strong core in my opinion. But there's still lots new additions to play around and the flow of the game has picked up the pace deerly since XYZ.
Hopes forward lol...
So if I'm building a Stall team, would you say that Toxapex + Aegislash would be redundant?![]()
Toxapex is incredible. With such astonishing bulk, excellent typing, and Recover, alongside Regenerator, this thing is looking to be a top tier threat. Like, it lives the strongest Earthquake in the game [CB 252+ Landorus-T's] and it even has some wiggle room in there. Without a Tapu Koko, good luck breaking this monster. For example, Toxapex shrugs off Aegislash, Pheromosa, and Genesect all in just one little slot. Hell, Landorus doesn't have a secure OHKO with Earth Power. The metagame will revolve around this thing. Not to be /that/ girl who goes "ban it all!!!" but mark my words... Toxapex will be suspected.
Not quite. I think it's fair to say that they do have some redundancies (i.e: both cover Pheromosa, both check Genesect, and both act as answers to the fighting type to varying extents). However, they also can function as compliments; for example, on the team I posted here the core of Toxic Spikes Toxapex and SubTox (Sub if TSpikes poisons everything, but Toxic on Aegi is a nice extra layer of poison protection for those who aren't grounded) Aegislash is incredibly effective. In addition, there is not a total overlap when it comes to their defensive capabilities. Toxapex can handle Fire types, but Aegislash cannot. Aegislash can handle Psychic types, but Toxapex cannot. Moreover, these two can very plausibly be paired on Stallish teams in the current metagame and seeing as both are very common Pokemon for Stall builds, I see them ending up on the same team sometimes fairly inevitable, which isn't a bad thing at all, simply the case given how things are working out currently.So if I'm building a Stall team, would you say that Toxapex + Aegislash would be redundant?
Does Mew even get conversion?Mew @ Normalium Z
Ability: Synchronize
EVs: 224 HP / 252 SpA / 32 Spe
Modest Nature
- Conversion
- Roost
- Thunder Bolt
- Ice Beam
We can entertain a few fringe sets, right? Basically this is a parasite Mew, he switches infront of Tapu Koko, uses Conversion, roosts and then begins to zap stuff. 32 outspeeds Admant Bisharp and Tyranitar, feel free to burrow from HP evs for more speed benchmarks.
Apparently not my bad, got confused with Transform, which apparently heals 25%.Does Mew even get conversion?
I like this set on teams that rely on sr and spikes to rack up damage. The main reason to use this set is dragon tail imo so poison jab is probably better then stone edge so you can deal decent damage to fairy types that want to switch in. Fire blast over earthquake is also an option to hit scizor and ferrothorn.While it seems that nobody has managed to make Guzzlord work well so far, I might be on to something... I won tonight's Sun/Moon tournament using a Tapu Lele offense team, and the defensive core I used for glue was Aegislash and...
![]()
T H I C C (Guzzlord) @ Assault Vest
Ability: Beast Boost
EVs: 252 Atk / 4 Def / 252 SpD
Adamant Nature
- Crunch
- Dragon Tail
- Earthquake
- Stone Edge
Shame this thing doesn't get Knock Off, would have made the set much better, but it's a very bulky attacker that sacrifices long-term longevity for immediate power and special walling, and can brute-force its way through quite a few attackers. Its fairly susceptible to burn, but Tapu Fini looks to be an incredible teammate (who I didn't use considering the goal of the primary team) as it covers Guzzlord's Ice, Dragon, Fighting, and Bug weaknesses, and while it may halve the damage of Dragon Tail against grounded opponents (whose main goal isn't damage anyway), doesn't affect the rest of its sizable damage, and can cover it from burns.
This set still has a few issues, most notably recovery, but for what it does do, it's worked out fairly well. Serene's Grace can attest to it, this thing ate up a max-investment Life Orb + Sheer Force Ice Beam from Nidoqueen and only took about 34%, retaliating with Earthquake.
Why do you think Steels will be broken even if Aegi gets banned? If anything, Fairy is broken and Steel is one of a very small amount of checks to it. Fighting still exists. Fire still exists. Ground still exists. There are certainly ways to deal with Steel-type pokemon. If anything, Stealth Rock is what's holding back the meta by preventing more defensive Fire-types from existing as a double check to Fairies and Steels.What I dislike is Lando-I, Ninja and Genesect. That stuff is broken. Aegi holds the whole "meta" together, but when that thing is gone, steels will be broken as well.
What I like is that Clef is not that relevant anymore, M-Mawile is gold and I don't need water/dark resists, bisharp could be Nice actually
open day for any steal is my answerI think SR are holding BACK the meta, not holding it together. But what I'm asking is why you think Aegi going would mean Steels would get stronger?