So how is the council going to avoid the Shadow Tag fiasco this time around with this "new" requirement? Because having post quality decided didn't exactly go over well 4 years ago when the controversy broke out with the amount of discarded votes in what was a very close call. Is there going to be a transparent and objective metric at which this will be done? Because being a tier leader alone didn't exempt potential confirmation bias from arising back then, or make completely closed off decision making on quality any less questionable when it comes to big suspects.
- One "decent quality" NP post (decent quality is to be determined by the tier leaders).