why are so many of these teams so weak to stall .-.
Because the original core isn't exactly effective vs stall, and personally, when i built my team i didn't care much to beat it at all. Does my team pretty much autolose to it? Yes. Put taunt on heatran if u really care, but if i'm not building something for the ladder or an opponent known to bring stall, I tend to not actively consider it (I may temporarily modify a team for these settings though). That doesn't mean that all my teams end up stall weak, just that on certain builds, I don't feel like sacrificing general quality to be better vs stall if the team doesn't develop naturally to combat stall pretty well (this is often affected by the starting point of a build, and also heavily influenced by the direction you choose to take on a build). I have other variants of that team which are very similar and better combat stall, but this round was for zam + zor, and i felt like such a team won't really naturally develop to combat stall well unless you dedicate slots/sets to actively deal with it better, which to me, is not worth it when it sacrifices general effectiveness. An example would be TDK's zard-x hyper offense: if you get the team from him, he will explicitly say to use taunt bisharp and roost zard if you plan to use it on the ladder. Why? Because it makes the team more effective against stall. In other settings, however, he prefers the original as it is generally more effective. In a tier like ORAS where it is practically impossible to cover everything, I think its better for a team to be good vs most things and accept being poor vs a little, rather than being middling vs most things. This is just my opinion though, so I can't speak for everyone obviously and i've noticed you tend to consider stall when you build much more than I do, but this is just my thought process behind the issue, and I welcome any counterarguments as to why I should consider stall more.























