Last one for the road!
SM OU: ABR (49) vs (51) TDK - A modern clash of the titans here with the two most recent OUTLs going at it. TDK recently passed the baton over to ABR for leadership of SM OU, but that does not mean he hasn't been in form lately, winning his last three in three different tiers against top players in each. From a raw playstyle perspective, ABR is a bit more reactive when it comes to forming strategies and cores around what he figures will do decently against his opponent whereas TDK is a bit more versatile outright, showing a number of fallback balances, a periodic stall, and even flashes of more offensive teams. In terms of gameplay, ABR is almost always a more conservative pilot, prioritizing preservation of tools necessary to win the game over immediate positioning and slight advantages in the early-to-mid game stages. He tends to minimize misplays, aside from a stray example or two throughout the course of the season, but also not rely upon many flashy reads or doubles until backed into a corner, which tends to fit well with his playstyle that usually gives him an inherent advantage from the start. On the other end, TDK is a bit more naturally aggressive, not quite reaching the extremes of modern day quick risk taking extraordinaires like two of his prior opponents, CBB and Blunder, but also not afraid to take the risk if he feels the reward is likely and worthwhile, especially when it comes to doubles when playing bulky-offense and balance early on. It is likely that this approach has let TDK keep up with both CBB and Blunder in recent weeks while still not falling for many of their aggressive doubles and reads, letting him storm through both games without much trouble. Given this and his tendency to naturally vary his teams that I touched on before, I reckon that TDK has the inherent upper-hand on ABR due to the element of unpredictability and the fact that he can use whatever tools he has at his disposal to position himself in a more comfortable fashion than ABR can in order to make progress, basically giving him a natural stylistic advantage. I do think that a lot will come down to the teambuilding of each player as opposed to the plays made, unfortunately, as I do not expect either to misplay much. All things considered, the game can go either way, but the match-up favors TDK despite ABR being more dominant and less prone to miscues thus far. Really looking forward to this one and perhaps the memes that proceed this post given the length of this prediction!
SM OU: Trosko (55) vs (45) Gondra - Both of these players have been impressive at times, but also questionable at other points. Throughout the past 4-5 weeks, Gondra has made some really impressive reads and they have paid off at some points, but he also has made a number of costly mistakes that surely hurt his chances of winning multiple games. Trosko is similar, but both sides of the spectrum are minimized significantly -- he does have plenty of outplaying potential, but also has had a couple of small slip-ups. Ultimately, I think he is a bit more of a steady and reliable player, especially in situations like these where there is pressure and he has a year or so more experience, which is part of why I favor him here. However, I'd like to top-it-off by saying that the Wolfpack have some pretty strong synergy when it comes to idea-sharing, which obviously correlates to teambuilding, and I think that they just have the better SM core of the two teams, which tends to correlate to success in these tournament settings more often than not. Overall, could go either way, but more faith in Trosko to play a well-rounded game and bring a solid team. Gondra can easily show up with a decent team and play the game of his life still, so don't count him out.
SM UU: PokeTCG gamer1288 (40) vs (60) Pak - I think these two are closer than most may seem to think in terms of gameplay, but it is clear that the influence of teambuilding help will play a large role on both sides and thus far Pearl is unmatched, as shown by the success of Pak thus far and even TDK in the tiebreaker game vs Christo. This isn't meant to take much away from Pak, who has shown to be a reliable and successful pilot and likely influence on these teams, and this is a large part of why I predict him to come out on top, but it would not be the most surprising thing for PokeTCG to come in and play a really strong, aggressive game and emerge victorious in a close one, so we'll have to wait and see what comes of it.
SM RU: soulgazer (75) vs (25) -Tsunami- - Jesus fucking christ, this season is a train-wreck and a half for Shake as is, but now he's also put in the tier that has played a large role in it becoming a train-wreck, RU. Oh and to top to it all off, he's also against the most consistent lower tier SPL performer out there in sg, so he's fucking doomed. As a spectator, all I can personally hope for is the most amount of aids, chokes, and meme-worthy moments possible in order to get the most value out of what surely will be a forgettable display from the rusted out clown who not only predicted his own teams games, but also predicted himself to lose for fucks sake. And there it is.
SM NU: Rodriblutar (45) vs (55) Zukushiku - Usually have a bit more to say on NU as it is one of my areas of expertise, but both of these guys are solid pilots who are pretty soft-spoken and tend to go under the radar. Rodri is a bit more wild, showing strokes of inexplicable genius at times, whereas Zuku is a product of monotype who has shown the big tournament scene that he can play with the best recently. Overall, Zuku has misplayed a couple games, but he has not done so to a horrible extent, especially relative to other NUers, and when he is playing his game, he does really well. I think this paired with the fact that he is more in-sync with his team support than Rodri (fuck rozes) leads me to favor Zuku, especially given recent performances, but both are pretty similar in terms of skill level and gameplay, so just going mostly off of external factors and overall performance thus far than anything too analysis based here.
SM DOU: marilli (45) vs (55) Kaori - I don't play doubles much, but I do want to say that Kaori demonstrates a really clear and intriguing understanding of the metagame and how games unfold as seen by his videos, which everyone can see on his channel btw, and from my personal experiences with him in call when other dudes play in the tier. marilli has been impressive dating back to Snake, even if he cooled off a bit recently, and I do not know enough specifically to really pick between the two, but my gut and minimal, likely unreliable intuition favors Kaori, so let's go with that!
ORAS OU: Updated Kanto (70) vs (30) Ricardo - A simple equation can be derived from this SPL's ORAS games in order to calculate consistent success: Updated Kanto + ABR support - xtra$hine support = w. UK has emerged as one of the more respectable pilots in the tier and while he has not played flawlessly, he has not hesitated to make a plethora of impressive positioning plays and reads to help him manage a more diverse gameplan than his past solely-offensive approach. R!cardo continues to show potential, but some games he just doesn't have it and you have to wonder what we will see from him here, his high ceiling or his low floor. The former may be enough for UK, but the latter surely will not be sufficient, leading to my significant favoring of the man who has been the most consistent in this metagame thus far compared to the utility substitute.
BW OU: SoulWind (45) vs (55) BKC - Another battle of two greats, this time in my old stomping ground of BW OU. Dating back to a much earlier time, both of these two have been seen as two of the better BW tournament players and this holds true to the present, where they have undoubtedly been two of the three best players in BW this SPL (alongside Dice). BKC's no-nonsense approach has worked wonders thus far and tends to put the game in the hands of him as a player as opposed to him and his opponent as teambuilders, which is ultimately his goal approach wise. This means that he does not overwhelm himself with potential outlets to maximize advantages with the cost of more unfavorable match-ups and he tries to be prepared for whatever can be thrown at him, a style that is fit fairly well for high-stake games such as those in playoffs or tiebreakers. SoulWind, on the other hand, is a bit more of a loose cannon, not afraid to mix it up and bring less orthodox teams that are likely to exploit whatever he expects while also being unpredictable himself. Over the past 3-4 years, SoulWind has not only risen to prominence in the SPL scene as a BWer, but also grown from a more standardized player when he was consistent to a consistently versatile, unpredictable player who has done well utilizing a number of different, incomparable strategies. Personally, I'm a big fan of this development and the fact that SoulWind has stuck with this throughout this SPL, but I still do not necessarily think that it will lead him to much success against BKC unless he wants to risk a lot for potentially nothing (or potentially a big initial advantage). Honestly, I'd put my money on SoulWind settling on a fairly run-of-the-mill Sand or Rain that may lean a bit more offensive while BKC settles on a Sand of a bulky-offensive variety, something that is right up his normal alley yet hard to take advantage of without very specific means of doing so that are often not worthwhile. This is as close as you'll get to a true man's SPL BW game under these current metagame conditions and I am thrilled to see it in finals and I hope that the better player wins, which leads me to my ultimate prediction -- BKC has played a steady, strong read oriented game thus far that gives him a minor upper-hand on SoulWind and I think he will take it, but I cannot say this with a ton of confidence as both are great. Cool game and I hope to catch it!
DPP OU: Void (35) vs (65) roscoe - Void has came in really well prepared against a number of opponents and executed at sufficient levels, but other games he just does not seem to have enough in him to outmanouver top-notch competition and I think this is another case of that seeing how solid roscoe has been all season long (tbh, over the past couple years, but I'm focusing more on the present with this one anyway). roscoe has a ton of support and clearly a strong grasp on gameplay and team structures himself as well. Pair this with success at a very consistent rate dating back to week 2 and I think he is clearly advantaged here in the last thinking match of the tournament.
ADV OU: Astamatitos (65) vs (35) Jirachee - Two of the "nice guy" figures from the old generation tournament community that don't appear to give off the vibes of "back in my day" or "get off my lawn" match-up in ADV for the second time this tournament. While Jirachee took the first game, it was largely thanks to the guiding hand of lady luck's coldest minion and while he gave himself a chance in a game of odds, Asta had a very legitimate chance to come out on top there, too, so it would not be fair to discount his efforts in that game. Aside from their lone prior match, both have played ADV for most of the tournament thus far and Asta has been more impressive gameplay and teambuilding wise despite having a slightly worse record, in my eyes. Asta is always prepared with flashy, yet justified, sets and/or strategies when it comes time to shine whereas Jirachee tends to rely upon fairly conventional, yet reliable and effective, teams from what I can see, perhaps influence by his teammate BKC at times. I cannot decipher a ton of what this will lead to match-up wise as ADV is far from my area of personal expertise, but I have always viewed Asta as a bit of a counter-measure to the standard ADV player and I also feel like his ability to pilot teams that he crafts is at an exceptionally high level whereas Jirachee may not necessarily be building alone and also lacks the amount of experience and success over time that Asta has in ADV. All things considered, I favor the Greek over the Canadian football enthusiast.
GSC OU: Fear (60) vs (40) choolio - Fear has been really solid in his gameplay all season long whereas it feels like Choolio has chooled off (haha) in recent weeks. Can honestly go either way and I do not know the first thing about GSC playstyles besides the fact that both seem to be more modern and take the initiative to give themselves advantages in the teambuilder, but I favor Fear just because it seems he has everything going for him at the moment while the same cannot be said for Choolio.
RBY OU: The Idiot Ninja (55) vs (45) MetalGro$$ - Not a ton to say about the players themselves or the series they have to play, but I do want to say that I would pay to hear the thoughts of all four managers/assmen during the series -- holy shit, this must be the worst fucking feeling ever, especially if you're on the losing side or getting haxed out. porco dio
Have it at 6-6, but slightly favor the Wolfpack overall if you want my honest opinion. The Raiders path to the red trophy involves one of two things, I reckon -- forcing a tiebreak at 6-6 as they are slightly favored there in my eyes or having one/multiple of their long-time weaker slots (RU, ORAS, and RBY mainly) pull through after a pretty tough season to sway momentum in their favor and perhaps break it open, especially if any of these games happen earlier on in the week. The Wolfpack have the more well-rounded, consistent roster whereas the Raiders have the higher highs and lower lows, for the most part. Series wide, I feel this favors the Wolfpack as I said before and I think the season thus far agrees with that assessment, but it is only one week and just twelve games of Pokemon, so anything can happen. Good luck to both teams and while I am not really pulling for either specifically, I am rooting for all of my friends so good luck to you guys!
Finally, thanks to everyone who actually told me they enjoyed to read these predictions posts and asked for more of them -- it's fun for me to think through and write out (I actually do quite a bit of replay watching, recollection of past games, and analysis of tiers I know that goes in to some of these) and while I know they have apparently stirred up controversy (not my intention and now how I thought some people would respond), I would like to believe they were worthwhile as more and more people got into predictions and some sick memes got produced because of my posts, so I am glad to help promote any positive tournament community interactions and enjoyment. Hope everyone had as fun an SPL as possible tbh!