Look, I get it, you're frustrated at the current tiering system and probably wish for pex to be sent to ubers faster than you can say egg. I agree, defensive mons like pex definitely need more attention and i firmly believe pex is an unhealthy pokemon for this current metagame. However, the way your argument is structured comes off as angry ad irrational. I've been in debates before, and rhetoric is very important in making an argument. Insulting the council and coming off as very enrgaed doesn't help your argument too much. Also, to add on, the main reason offensive threats are banned more than defensive threats is because its much more easy to identify whether an offensive mon is broken. For an offensive mon to be broken, it just basically needs to warp teambuilding to have dedicated checks to it and those checks may not even be that useful in dealing with the threat. For defensive mons, its much harder to identify what makes it restricting and it takes time to truly see if the defensive mon warps the metagame. There are many people, including several council members, who are definitely keeping an eye on toxapex and it should be given a suspect very soon. This is coming from your average ladder player, not some top player, about how while not everyone agrees with the council's decisions, most of their choices have been very good so far.I dont know why but all the f***ing smogon council ban offensive things but not defensive mons. Always has the fucking excuse in "they contrain teambuilder", "they dont have counter", "they are fun to play", "presure stall cores" but shit like Toxapex and Clef doesnt get a suspect test ever.
Pre DLC meta was Teleport Clef everywhere fucking >50% usage rate, but council was "we can't ban clef, he is finch favorite mon", "he help the meta to be more stall oriented", "we have to wait a fucking meta to be playable again bc we dont ban the pinky thing" or something like "PUPL>ladder" in the case of arena trap ban.
I like to play with rules but the council doesnt give a shit about making the meta fun to play, the want match of 100 turn at minimun to be "competitive"
The only reason i always play in lower tier instead of OU is bc the 50% of the team are always the same shit: stall, sand balance, some form of hyperoffence and this was the same from the start of SSOU
Edit: this is going to be banned soon bc mod dont like to talk about how crappy the council banning system is.. =(
As for clefable, the main reason it wasn't looked at too much was because we didn't know whether we should ban clef or teleport. Clef was the only problematic user of it, but once we got rid of all the immediately broken stuff DLC was upon us, so it would be a good idea to see if other mons with teleport are too much or is it just clef specifically. Also, I always prefer a suspect test, even if the outcome is obvious. The community as a whole should decide what stays and goes, not a small group of top players.
Now that all the crazy crap like mag and cinderace are gone, many more players are talking about how pex is beginning to be problematic. Many posts in the last thread and this one have brought up pex as an issue. Pex has enough people wanting to hold a suspect for it, so im sure pex will be deal with, though preferably sooner than later so we can get rid of this crap. I'd honestly even argue doing a pex suspect BEFORE the cinderace retest, as it find it to be a major problem. While pex is one of the better cinderace checks, I honestly doubt that an outcome of a retest on cinderace would change whether pex would still be here or in ubers. In fact, I think that Another survey should be held where players can vote on whether we should suspect pex or rested cinderace first. That definitely makes it more inclusive.
All in all, I get your frustrations, but when making an argument make sure it comes off as informed and detailed so others can see your point better. You missed a lot of key points, like why clef was held off on testing or that none of the council has a problem with pex. Hope this helps clear some stuff up.