there is no number 4 on the playerlist
blue_tornado is sneaky and there is actually 13 players ;)
LIVING PLAYERS: [12]
Obviously, stating opinions is better than stating facts. Facts have no consequence; they aren't going to offend anyone, or evoke any sort of reaction. Facts are easy to hide behind while the rest of the game throws opinions at each other. I thought this was obvious.Da Letter El said:Do you believe that stating opinions is better than stating facts? Explain your thought process behind this.
Why, is it because you relate to Bluebeard, a murderous man, much like you mafia scum?Honolulu Blue the color of champions
Nah, it was just dumb because I share slight insight into how the color test typically works in that thread, which makes it less effective. However, unlike that game, people are focusing a lot less on that (which is probably a good thing).DLE on the other has made it clear he is acting in the exact same manner that he has as a villager in several other mafia games. He has repeated this three times.
And then with that last one he was even like "oh maybe I shouldn't have posted that"
Why? Cause it might get people not take the quiz? Or because you might have gone too far with the "this my town face, watch me act as I always have in this town manner"? Or conveniently both?
Townish post; has some stuff that leans mafia such as "is it such mafia behavior..." in that it feels like a false construction, but generally feels pretty honest.Obviously, stating opinions is better than stating facts. Facts have no consequence; they aren't going to offend anyone, or evoke any sort of reaction. Facts are easy to hide behind while the rest of the game throws opinions at each other. I thought this was obvious.
There have now been three users who have "called me out" for "being off" but don't have the balls to vote for me. You know what the surest sign of a mafian is? Ballslessness. A mafian is not sure whether they want to be starting a feud with a certain user so they choose not to until they think its safe. So they make wimpy half-judgments nobody can use as evidence against them later.
So to Walrein, Paperblade, and vonFiedler, if I could vote for three users at the same time, it would be you three. And while it pains me to take my vote off of DLE who has continued his behavior despite being called out on it, I would like to hear from one of you on why you did not vote the way you posted. Also, please explain why it is that I appear off. Is it such mafia behavior to call someone out for their bullshit?
I've seen votes on Paperblade and Von, so for now I'll
##Unvote
##Vote Walrein
It is because I am related to the warrior in Honolulu Blue, the pub stomper Ndamukong Suh, who is going to curb stomp all the mafia members skulls.Why, is it because you relate to Bluebeard, a murderous man, much like you mafia scum?
There was only one reason why I voted Walrein, and that was that he hadn't received any pressure at all up to this point in the game. He's been hiding behind his "lol caps post restriction" defense without giving many serious opinions.DLE #109 said:2. Why walrein over Paperblade and vonfiedler? Is it solely based on the fact that he has no votes on him currently, or is there something specific about walrein that makes you feel as though you should vote for him over the other two?
I don't have any experience playing with the three of them (Walrein, Paperblade, and von) as village. All I've seen of them is than Walrein's obvmafia performance in Mafia Mafia 2 Mafia 1 and Paperblade being on my mafia team in Walrein's game. As such I don't have any sort of "baseline" for them like I have with you, with whom I've talked multiple times about what the best way to play NOC is, as villy or mafia.DLE #109 said:1. Do you believe all 3 of the users you called out would typically "have balls" if they were town? Explain
When the calling it is bullshit, yes it is mafia behavior. Case in point, you accuse me of ballslessness when I immediately voted for Paperblade after witnessing him try to swing the vote for no reason. I was still voting for Paperblade when I called you out. Now instead of addressing my points you've made sweeping statements about other players and voted in a fashion to draw the least attention. So now I'm quite a bit certain you are mafia and DLE is not. As such;There have now been three users who have "called me out" for "being off" but don't have the balls to vote for me. You know what the surest sign of a mafian is? Ballslessness. A mafian is not sure whether they want to be starting a feud with a certain user so they choose not to until they think its safe. So they make wimpy half-judgments nobody can use as evidence against them later.
So to Walrein, Paperblade, and vonFiedler, if I could vote for three users at the same time, it would be you three. And while it pains me to take my vote off of DLE who has continued his behavior despite being called out on it, I would like to hear from one of you on why you did not vote the way you posted. Also, please explain why it is that I appear off. Is it such mafia behavior to call someone out for their bullshit?
To the latter, obviously.So vonfiedler, is the reason for your suspicion on paperblade based mostly on paperblade's "being dumb" or more on his following of my vote? Or is it something else or some combination of those? What specifically is paperblade doing that you believe is suspicious?
In addition, you expressed some suspicion of askaninjask. If askaninask were to be lynched right this instant, would you feel comfortable with said lynch?
JALMONT DOESN'T HAVE A POSTING RESTRICTION...?on Walrein/Jalmont: I put them together because of their posting restrictions just to say that a restriction doesn't clean a person at all, mainly because a) this is expert and BT mentioned that there would be a whole bunch of non standard roles for both sides and b)they're both decent enough players to fake having a restriction. in addition, jalmont fucking sucks.