I'm willing to say offensive Cyclizar could work as a 3A + Shed Tail idea. Cyclizar by nature encourages using aggressive opposing Pokemon to minimize momentum advantage generated by Shed Tail, and offensive mons usually don't have the greatest bulk such that high power, even coming off Cyc's mediocre offenses, can still leave damage with some amount of progress if not lure in and remove them to help the teammate sweep later (Sub or not by then).
Unless passing to something particularly hard to break like a Multiscale Dragonite, bulky Kingambit, or maybe Iron Hands (the latter two on the Physical side), 70 HP vs 85 HP on the Sub probably won't decide the game by buying an extra turn anyway, so the HP EVs might do more work on the rare occasion that Cyclizar clicks to hit something instead of shedding another tail
That said hard agree with Finch's point above that if not using Shed Tail in some form, Cyclizar isn't the mon you want for optimal performance.
Unless passing to something particularly hard to break like a Multiscale Dragonite, bulky Kingambit, or maybe Iron Hands (the latter two on the Physical side), 70 HP vs 85 HP on the Sub probably won't decide the game by buying an extra turn anyway, so the HP EVs might do more work on the rare occasion that Cyclizar clicks to hit something instead of shedding another tail
That said hard agree with Finch's point above that if not using Shed Tail in some form, Cyclizar isn't the mon you want for optimal performance.
At what point do we just let the Glaceon joke die and/or take more direct action against users who aren't taking the hint (unless such has occurred in which case I apologize for assuming, just hard to be sure when I'm mostly in threads)? The Glaceon talk obviously ran its course both for any iota of serious consideration and the ironic propping up, but after being black listed and continuing to see it occupy posts from one or more users, I'm not sure the message is getting across to the degree it should be for the serious posters.