Elise vs
Bvrvkkv - Oh boy. Both missed times/weren't great at scheduling during the TWO WEEK window in which to get the game done, which initially led me to thinking a coinflip was the right idea. However, some of Bvrvkkv's actions have been outside of what would be deemed as acceptable scheduling etiquette. This involves: deleting VMs on the first Sunday after Elise had missed a time; a total inflexibility in scheduling, only being free for an unreasonable period for the opponent on the last day of the extension; also showing a clear lack of desire to actually get the game done once an extension had been granted, often not replying for days on end. Also, the entire VM conversation has since been deleted, casting even more doubt on Bvrvkkvs intentions of getting the game done. This can only reasonably be taken as trying to 'scum' out an activity win. I was originally ready to give him the benefit of the doubt in this saga, but I have been told this is not the first time such terrible scheduling and aggressive pushing for activity wins has happened.
As a result of all this,
Elise will be given the activity win. Such actions won't be tolerated and consider this a final warning, especially with our circuit beginning soon.
Schedule properly, pretty please.
Demantoid vs
Shadowmonstr4 - A much simpler affair, PS issues required an extension to be granted, but Demantoid didn't respond to attempts to schedule this week.
Shadowmonstr4 get the activity win.
