I mean you can undersell the difference, but that doesn't change how little correspondence you had with them. Secondly yes they replied with small quips to Yeti, asek however NEVER did that to you, even with Moody's small contributions asek mocked him twice. The fact there is so little between you stands as something unusual.Search > "yeti" > this thread > by: Aura Guardian/Asek
Like yeah slightly more than me (but then again, yeti was also more active than I could be (and asked a lot of things I wanted to ask before I could...)) but the vast majority were just small quips or one liners in response to something yeti said.
Also seriously, this is a pretty garbage way to attack someone. Like, there's 0 way to defend ones self from the way someone is reading the actions of dead scum. Ofc the obvious answer is just you are scum and making shit up to cause mislynches. But still. There's 0 way for me to actually respond to this accusation, and that seems very intentional.
His other option was jumping on DLE, someone he expressed the possiblity of lynching first anyways and is in many poes, not choosing to do so implies he either had given up or had a specific reason to push Former instead. While he did suicide eventually to shut Hitmon up, then I do not see the point of voting Former at all if he had given, though could have been going through the motions. This is mostly WIFOM in the end, but it does compound on the rest of my observations.point noted but it seems farfetched that AG would attempt to """"distance"""" from his buddy that way when said buddy is already in literally the best position to win lylo
ok I'm gone now
I need you, to prevent forest fires and actually do shit. I view you positively but until you get your shit together I have to expect the worst case of having to lynch myself just to prevent me going to LYLO with Former lol.if you need me ping me and i'll get back to you when i get back.
Aura
1353- brief iso on pre-wall Light and an iso on Metal. This is the iso I said was half-finished and on second look it seems like he made it without checking the NK. Which kinda wrecks half his basis for voting Metal in the first place since he was partially hinging on Metal predicting Hawkie and Proph's alignments. Imagine I just posted a gif of Lucille Ball grimacing, because that's how I feel here.
1376- Brings up OMGUS in reference to his iso on metal. Confusing until I remind myself that OMGUS originally had a non-retaliatory usage.
1379- This is the post my general impression of Aura was based in before the D2 hammer. Second sentence is a very Townie pov.
1399- Acknowledges Hawkie's death.
1426- iso on Texas. Says Tex's 97 read like a VT softclaim. Applies awareness of Hawkie's death to the read, along with a general statement on Hawkie's flip. That general statement about people looking better or potentially worse is the closest we get to him correcting the "predicting Hawkie" part of his read on Metal. Both reads Tex as Town and wants to use Texas's own suggested tactics later in the game. I'm trying to parse the fact that he's excusing fluffy Texas posts but called fluffy Metal posts "junk". Is it an issue of Metal looking worse by comparison?
1471/1473- Aura's last posts of D2. Asks about majority and then rephrases it in a way that looks worse in tone.
D3
1500- Scumleans Former, pointing out actions as inconsistent and citing Former's reason for voting Metal as hypocritical behavior. Then cites Metal's mislynch and needing to read new content as reasons not to vote him. I like that he's scrutinizing a generally TR'd slot (shows individual thought process), but I'm also trying to parse some wifom that comes from part of his read on Former involving Metal's wagon. I think I'm hung up on 1353 in that regard.
1506/1520/1525- Refutes Light's read on Hitmon, then proceeds to potentially out the second mason. Scum being able to figure it out themselves does not excuse actions that make it easier to find Masons.
1610- readslist. How is Former "down to" a scumlean when your iso already said he was a scum lean?
1618- says why Metal hammer reads scummier than metal L-1. I disagree that L-1 was not an issue becuase L-1 was reached in less than 24 hours and that is an issue.
Aura is scum and I'm going to bed.
I did explain it, stop being daft. Let me try again, ahem BECAUSE I SUSPECTED HITMONLEET MORE!!! In other news, man pushes main suspect over a secondary read, gets lynched for it, more at 7.LightWolf You never explained why you decided to push a counterwagon to AG while saying that he was pretty scummy, even after being called out on it multiple times
So what if it's convenient? That's not an argument, that's a WIFOM. Texas also pushed Proph over Asek despite expressing interest in putting either at L-1, is him mislynching Proph also too convenient despite us now knowing he was town. Is Hawkie's blind tunnel onto Proph day 1 to the ignorance of everything else also just as convenient? Isn't it extremely convenient that if I didn't keep Hitmon pushing till he claimed he'd still likely be alive and just as scummy and far more likely to be mislynched because at this point no one would buy his mason claim?You'll have to admit "I SR that one scum but suspects that one town coutnerwagon more" is a pretty convenient explanation
Usually when there are 2 scum left people who are confident they might be pushing mafia will look at the other slots and think "ok if this one is scum it's probably X or Y" instead of sidestepping calls from other players to take stances on the rest of the playerlist
I find it kind of weak. Maybe it'd be more convincing if I saw the actual quotes you were talking about.DLE: Most note worthy interactions are three cases I'd say. After Asek had been pushing Empoof consistently why defending me and DLE from time to time, he calls out Hitmon and points out how Hitmon only highlighted me and Empoof for idling but not DLE. I can't see him using this to push his iDLE buddy while directing away from Empoof who he had been pushing for most of the middle part of the day. Then there is the case of the delayed ISO, when AG promised to ISO Asek(which he never did) Yeti called out AG's DLE read, which eventually led to AG dropping the Asek read and doing DLE first. I find it highly unlikely, that even with prompting from Yeti, he specifically delays the ISO of his scum buddy to read his other scum buddy worse than previously. Third event is how AG completely flipped his read on DLE, and called his playstyle not matching his expectations of DLE, despite in his previous ISO of him while being wishy washy, still town leaning him as a whole, yet he now thinks DLE is scummy, not even for what his sub had done during the day. All those considered I find DLE being third scum extremely unlikely.
saying he "never explained why he pushed hitmon>AG" he made it very clear how he felt... maybe a little to clear? If you were to ignore LW's tunnel on hitmon then you would have to do so willingly. There is no way you were unaware of why he was doing it.LightWolf You never explained why you decided to push a counterwagon to AG while saying that he was pretty scummy, even after being called out on it multiple times
Will go back and reread that l8r posting as a self reminderDisagree that AG was under no pressure before KoC's post as he was getting looks from a few people (Yeti/Me I'm pretty sure, don't remember anyone else) as of 1 or 2 pages before it
Don't disagree that it looks good for Knights but I'll look back and see if he made other isos of that kind back then
If your argument is that you can't trust my reasons for pushing leet over AG, then why did you keep asking for them. That's an exercise in pointlessness when all you had to say was, "He pushed Hitmon over AG, this is never acceptable". Which you obviously don't say because it is idiotic, so you push for me over and over to state why I did what I did then shut it down claiming that's just a WIFOM.The matter is not that he had whatever reason to push the easiest mislynch to be had in this game state
It is that he ignored the fact that what he was doing was to push a counterwagon to someone he agreed was very sketchy, without explicitly weighing the two as TvS or even SvS, it was just a tunnel which we are asked to believe was made for the reasons he's stated.
Firstly, the quotes are all there, in that very post, it's just you being lazy not finding them, especially when yourself pointed out how easy it is to even use the search engine to find the correct combos.I find it kind of weak. Maybe it'd be more convincing if I saw the actual quotes you were talking about.
For example, Asek at the time was 100% in a more precarious position while DLE was in a bad, but not awful position. So I don't see AG dropping an asek ISO to do a DLE one where he pushes for townDLE to be significant in a towny sense. If anything, it looks like AG was attempting to help his one buddy who actually had a chance.
There's also the flip bit where AG was calling out DLE as town for weak reasons and then starts to scum read him once it seemed like AG might be lynched. That to me looks *very* much like trying to distance yourself from someone.
There's also stuff too that I pointed out in my AG ISO where at times AG felt very frustrated. Both during the day with Asek lynch and on the last day. This of course makes a lot of sense if he believes mafia aren't in a great position and that the last person probably doesn't have much of a chance, either through idling or w/e.
This is wifom, but kill wise the leet kill also makes the most sense coming from you and epik. You because leet was 100% going to push you the next day (though I see this as less likely then...) but also makes sense from the view point of someone not entirely caught up on the game and believes leet's mason claim.
All in all, I find that read of yours to be sorta meh and hardly a basis to keep him out of a lynch pool. That said, I do think it's weird that scum LW tries to narrow his lynch down to just me? Like I can't really see the game plan there but w/e.
Why would I plan for the flip of Hitmonleet day 4, if he is scum he won't flip that day no matter what. Of course he'd claim mason if he was scum there after no one else attempted to claim and I spent all day reasoning there had to be a third mason most likely.If people could stop pretending tunneling Leet over a stated scum read without commenting on the implications that would result from either's flip and while dodging prods to do so is natural townie behavior and self-explanatory that would be just great
Does this post make sense to anyoneWhy would I plan for the flip of Hitmonleet day 4, if he is scum he won't flip that day no matter what. Of course he'd claim mason if he was scum there after no one else attempted to claim and I spent all day reasoning there had to be a third mason most likely.