Minority I had asked you how a trade happened when the existing rules forbade it, and the rules themselves weren't addressed or updated in that trade, to which you replied "all decisions are up to host discretion", yet still not addressing the rule itself. I questioned you again about it, and you replied after announcing an update to the rule, which I appreciate. But you felt it necessary to point out I'm not in UPL. Does that make a difference? I'm not seeing the logic in that, but whatever.
On discord I've voiced a few times that I agree this expanded UPL would benefit from modified trade rules, but them happening in the middle of the tour, with no transparency, is what I questioned.
If you challenge this admin decision further
You can read back and you'll find, I never challenged the decision, I merely asked for an explanation
I have not used hostile words or tone here, so I'm not sure where you get the idea.
I may have to write you up with an infraction for unsportsmanlike conduct, dude.
I'm sure you'll write that up faster than an update to the trading rules, dude.
Listen dude, you're a good kid. Please put your pride aside and stop berating me so that I can do my job correctly.
Again, I never berated you, this was about a simple question on an admin decision but if you think it directly berates you, then you're the one holding your nose too high.
