That's enough nitpicky talk about what defensive utility is and Pheromosa, a Pokemon that isn't even in the tier. Let's stick to the discussion points and answer posts in completion, thanks
offense a soft switch-in to super hard hitting stuff like heatran, weakened kyub and hoopau, blacephalon, manaphy, victini, weavile, etc. and forces them out without having to sack something. It even has a stupid priority move to help not get swept by fastmons.
Hence "soft" switch in. Clefable can't switch in to Hoops because gunk shot. Tapu Bulu can't switch into gren because gunk shot. Tangrowth can't switch into manaphy because z blizzard. Toxapex can't switch into Greninja because z dig. Tapu Fini can't switch into weavile because poisn jab. Zapdos can't switch into lando t because z stone edge. Heatran can't switch into magearna because z focus blast. Zapdos can't switch into tapu Bulu because z stone edge. No water or ground types can switch into Heatran because bloom doom. In fact, can't switch anything at all into kyu or hoopa because of their infinite moves and item slots, plus your opponent's perfect prediction!
Heck, the bulu and tangrowth you mentioned as Greninja "checks" lose to ice beam. Not to mention predicting ash gren then getting hit with a protean gunk shot.
Sorry that Greninja doesn't hard counter some of the hardest-hitting mons in the tier, I guess? I never said it did.
I'd be really interested in the replay where kyub and victini exclusively spammed fusion bolt all game, though. Sounds like a fun match.
I don't know why you, again, are acting as if I said greninja is the bulkiest shit in the tier. You literally typed "check", which definitely covers revenger killers, not to mention that Greninja /can/ switch in on these if need be. Hard probably wasn't the best descriptor, but if you are playing HO, and they manage to get set up, Greninja is one of the few things that can prevent them from sweeping.
it's funny how you took "hard" check so literally here (so much so that you mentioned it twice) but conveniently ignored the implication of "soft" switch-in the first time. And that you entirely ignored the overall context of my post being "Greninja can take more hits than zeraora & mega alakazam and can revenge kill some stuff". not to mention that we both think it should be A+
It's almost as if you're being argumentative for no reason ?
ps specs ninja can 1hko mawile with shuriken after rocks & 1 spike (which you added to your calc) so...
check your calcs before pointless arguing please.
pss non specs hydro pump easily kills weavile after rocks or even like 1 sandstorm turn, and specs water shuriken can kill after rocks so..... same as above
and gives offense a soft switch-in to super hard hitting stuff
he said, while being argumentative for no reasonIt's almost as if you're being argumentative for no reason ?
This is cool but you'd run double edge instead of stone edge imo to be able to suicide yourself, ala explosion. This is what UU sets ran for a while. I don't think it's better than exca cus you can't get past sab, but cool nonetheless. C- imo.Talking of last slate, I nommed Aerodactyl to C- but sadly there was little discussion (probably cause my write up was kinda crap) so I'm going to do that again:
Aerodactyl to C-
View attachment 142724
Aerodactyl @ Focus Sash
Ability: Unnerve
Shiny: Yes
EVs: 252 Atk / 4 SpD / 252 Spe
Jolly Nature
- Stone Edge
- Earthquake
- Taunt
- Stealth Rock
Aero is a really good lead in this meta, which I have been using a lot recently. It has a great speed tier, tying with Koko, allowing it to outspeed and taunt all opposing leads (bar screens electrode if you count that, with screens Koko being a tie), allowing you to prevent enemy rocks as well as set your own, which is great for if you have rocks weak sweepers (such as blace or gyara). It also threatens opposing foggers like torn t and zapdos with stone edge, and can provide tailwind support if necessary as well. Alternatively, EQ allows you to have a better matchup V lead excadrill. It has great matchups V nearly all opposing leads, struggling only with stall (it cant break msab without a crit). Let's look at its matchups V common leads/SR setters.
Lando: You can taunt it + get rocks, the standard set can't touch you so all they can do is either blow up (pointless) or swap and try to take advantage of aero, which is not really possible due to taunt.
Exca: you can taunt it, then take it out with EQ. Only struggles V rock tomb variants.
Tran: EQ kills this, if you're a tailwind variant you can taunt it + get rocks, if it went for rocks or taunt on your taunt you can also grab tailwind or get an edge off, and that's banking on it hitting both magmas.
Ribombee: You can taunt + get rocks and edge this, since it'll be too scared of mega to not click webs t1 so can't go for the moonblast (which 2hkos).
Araquanid: You have to outplay the magic coats. At best you kill it without it getting webs, the worst that can happen depends on how you play it out (clicking edge T1 has the least consequences unless them getting webs is an autoloss).
Screens Koko: Presuming you know it's screens, it's a tie for taunt. If you lose the tie, just spam EQ on it and there's a good chance you prevent it getting both screens up, and aero will be on full so it can get rocks V the next thing (taunting it will probably be necessary too since they're screens HO).
Mdiancie: EQ is a 2hko, so is edge if they mega t1, then you can rocks when it's dead.
To conclude, this thing has some great lead matchups, can get rocks really reliably and is great at preventing them too due to taunt. It's only flaws are stall and fake out MLop. I personally consider this to be a better lead than exca, and it's certainly better than Azelf who's sat in C-, and definitely deserves a rank.
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen7ou-820135880 - Got rocks + allowed me to know it was scarf gren, if tran hadve clicked rocks when it came back in would've almost certainly got another kill or at least some good chip
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen7ou-817817170 - Got rocks, prevented tspikes + some good chip on pex, stopped from spamming bulk up
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen7ou-816471443 - I choked by not taunting the Koko but it still killed it, got sr and prevented mage and zyg from setting up which would've been catastrophic
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/gen7ou-815934216 - Got rocks, prevents ttar from dding
Replays for the tailwind version on old nom, if you look for replays on GiantLobster or ChilledLobster there's loads of it doing it's job.
However, it does not stop here. Besides these already amazing sets, Lando-t also has access to a plethora of highly rewarding and threatening (and criminally underrated) Z-sets which have a limited pool of checks and very obscure counters (read: Iron Defense Mega Slowbro and Skarmory). Sure, these aren’t as common as they should be but does that necessarily take away effectiveness?
So does Ash-Gren! Just because people don't use its Z-move sets as much as they should doesn't make them not good! Let's dispel with this myth that specs is the only set Ash-Gren can use. Acid Downpour lures and kills a shit ton of mons. Hydro vortex lets gren get to ash mode (where it has the power of normal specs gren) and still be able to switch moves which is the one major handicap of the specs set. I'm honestly surprised I haven't seen more black hole eclipse, which is a happy middle ground between the two.
Darkinium-Z against 248/252+ Toxapex: 41.4-49.8%. With rocks + spikes, dark pulse on the switch (your opponent is switching). Then dark pulse again as they click toxic spikes. Boom lured and killed toxapex. Nobody is clicking recover, worst case scenario your opponent toxics your now-transformed greninja, and has lost their pex (which they probably needed for more than just gren).
Darkinium-Z against 252/232+ AV Tangrowth: 41-48% same story only without leftovers recovery you just need a bit of chip/extra layer of spikes For 1 dark pulse on switch. You don't get the roll you're looking for on the first dark pulse switch out and try again. There's your extra chip by the way.
And that's against 2 mons that love to take greninja on! All-out pummeling destroys chansey, and shattered psyche/acid downpour murder pex/Tangrowth outright again with just a little chip. This thing doesn't need protean to beat its counters. Just the appropriate Z-move. This thing has the ability to be "terrifyingly unpredictable" people just don't use it because specs already shits on the metagame.
Greninja's super power and what makes it S-worthy is it forces switches to defensive low danger mons like nothing else. I'm facing literally any other mon in the game I have the option to sack something. I'm not sacking against ash-gren for fear of a transformed specs set. In addition to this, with spikes + dark pulse it has a decent chance to chip/hax it way through whatever is trying to answer it. Furthermore, with the appropriate z-move it can shit on any of its so-called counters (acid-downpour currently the best).
Last but not least. Like char-x benefits from char-y, and any mon with a viable normal form/mega forces their opponent into a guessing game, protean Greninja is an A+ mon in its own right, and does not make Ash-Greninja as predictable as you think it is.
So does Ash-Gren! Just because people don't use its Z-move sets as much as they should doesn't make them not good! Let's dispel with this myth that specs is the only set Ash-Gren can use
i wanted to answer this mainly.
e.g: you're using z gunk gren. you're up against bulu - sure it's now not a switchin in the slightest but its rare that
a) your opponent is just so hopelessly weak to ash gren they just lose to a non choiced gren without spikes on the field (the same power as specs non-evolved)
b) they have no other way to check ash gren defensively (again, without specs it's not that scary)
Thanks for your thoughtful commentary, I respectfully disagree...
Secondly, I think you're underestimating item-less Ash-gren.
a base 75 stab multi-hit priority move.
In most battles the specs set isn't transforming until it's time to clean, which means most of the battle you're running normal specs greninja. Ash-Greninja has that power but can switch moves.
Now specifically addressing toxapex. Toxapex is a standout defensive mon that walls 80% of the tier.
No one uses Ash-Greninja as their pex counter
Now, you're telling me the only viable build is to run toxapex + other greninja checks, because you need the other checks for the specs set, and toxapex for the Acid downpour set, and this mon isn't S rank?
P.S. Every time I've faced Acid Downpour Ash Greninja I've lost to it. My team is amply prepared for specs, but my Gren counter (Azumarill) just dies to Acid down pour.
Acid downpour gren blows its common counters...then it's definitely S-rank on its own.
Definitely gonna agree with talah here ash gren should be going to S but only because of its consistency with the specs set.i really hate long winded back and forth argumentsso i'll try to keep it short.(it's long already)
zgunk does NOT blow thru tangrowth.
252 SpA Greninja Dark Pulse vs. 252 HP / 228+ SpD Assault Vest Tangrowth: 84-99 (20.7 - 24.5%) -- guaranteed 5HKO
0 Atk Greninja Acid Downpour (190 BP) vs. 252 HP / 28 Def Tangrowth: 212-250 (52.4 - 61.8%) -- guaranteed 2HKO
assuming rocks up, you need 2 tang switchins into 2 dark pulse max rolls then get another 2 max rolls on both pulse and the z.
u do kill bulu, nothing there.
fini is not nearly as common as everything else on the gren "counter" list(bulu, tangrowth, av magearna, toxapex, ferrothorn, by far the 5 most common) out of which gunk only reliably lures just 1 and very shakily the other.
im really not, prior to evolving its piss weak and after evolving its strong but it has to evolve to do that(z lures will NOT evolve in the large majority of games, at least won't do it nearly as effortlessly as regular specs ash) and even then it's not the terror to face that specs evolved is.
60, fwiw
really it's kinda the other way around - z lures aren't transforming in most games, specs is. z lures can transform when they get the right matchup - again, not at ALL consistent, not nearly so, assuming that short list of 5 mons which largely make up what people use to switch into it.
it does not and regular specs gren very well can break through toxapex. due to spikes
never said it is, quite the opposite in fact. no idea where this is coming from.
not in the slightest what i said. i also didn't say anything in regards to what ranking it should be placed in, just how the z-lure argument is flawed.
more of a teambuilding error than a testament to z-gunk's viability.
and one final thing i'm not sure i properly addressed;
as i said above, the z lures only lure a very small portion of its counter list, which the specs set ALREADY puts pressure on that your teammates can abuse regardless. you're giving up ash gren's by FAR biggest quality, aka its sheer consistency for a set that will work only a small percentage of the time and is not even guaranteed to work.
i made it long anyway so might as well go through them again.
z-gunk: consistently lures bulu, inconsistently lures tangrowth. toxapex magearna ferrothorn completely wall.
z-esense: inconsistently lures toxapex, nothing else.
z-fight: inconsisntely lures ferrothorn, nothing else.
z-water: can break through everything on that list with more difficulty than specs, except magearna which it beats easier.
z-dark: can break through toxapex/tangrowth w/ an easier time, ferrothorn roughly the same, magearna harder, bulu harder
specs: can break through every single aforementioned mon without ridiculous requirements.
and another thing you give up when you give up specs is your ability to revenge kill. specs has a much, MUCH easier time renenge killing things like zygarde, mawile, heracross, lati@s, torn, medicham etc etc. i won't go too much further into this because i think it's very obvious as to why.
another TL;DR: you give up consistency(spikes) and offensive pressure(revenge killing) in order to lure(often inconsistenly) a small subset of what gren's counters are. you can take advantage of those mons with your teammates regardless because of gren's ability to set and keep spikes up with relative ease, so luring them isn't nearly as big enough a deal.
i really hate long winded back and forth argumentsso i'll try to keep it short.(it's long already)
fini is not nearly as common as everything else on the gren "counter" list(bulu, tangrowth, av magearna, toxapex, ferrothorn, by far the 5 most common) out of which gunk only reliably lures just 1 and very shakily the other.
No way should Weavile go to B.Hi here, just want to make some quick nominations.
View attachment 143664Weavile from B+ to B:
I don't think Weavile is quite as good as it used to be back when Toxapex, Tapu Fini, Stall, and Magearna were less common as they are now. Weavile simply struggles to leave an impact in the majority of matches. Against Stall, it has trouble posing much of a threat towards anything, and against common Bulky Offense and Balanced teams, is struggles to deal with Pokemon such as Toxapex, Celesteela, Tapu Fini, Magearna, and Mega Slowbro. Against Hyper Offense, it also struggles, as it invites in Magearna to set up for free. Finally, the Mega Lati Twins are much less common, meaning its Pursuit trapping capabilities are far less useful. Overall, Weavile relies very heavily on rather specific matchups to be effective at the moment, and it should drop to reflect this.
im acutally tired of this rhetoric as it's tone deaf and pretty much like -_-, like dude please. to be specific I mean:" the limitations of transforming to full power hold it back enough." Like you've got to be kidding me. For starters, theres a reason 2 of the most broken mons in the tier are paired with each other (magearna and ash gren) and it's not remotely a coincidence that sacking gives them boosts in power. There are teams made for shit like that and lets not act like everything is in a vacuum. To continue lets say I guess ur the specs set - which i used to do - what if ur not? What if ur protean, what if that set just kod my counter.... theres so many things wrong with ninja and ur gonna say it has issues transforming? Unless ur brining a chansey every game what the hell are u talking about, when has greninja EVER had an issue transforming. BTW that's not a rhetorical question, that is an open question to literally everyone on this thread. When in the history of sun/moon, has your ash gren ever had an issue getting it's kill to transform(other than chansey)? You are acting like it doesn't have revenge killing potential easily and can just uturn or pick off weakened mons. tired of that ridiculous statementIn my opinion the only thing from keeping Ash Greninja from being S, or downright busted is its pre transformation, there are a number of specially defensive or even just general bulky mons in the tier that can handle pre-Battle Bond Gren.
Specs full power Hydro + Pulse is a crazy combo and it's speed is cusping on the edge of broken, but most teams weak to ash gren tend to have at least an answer to the weaker form or a scarfer who can avoid/resist shuriken. Bringing me to the main reason pre-Battle Bond Gren keeps the forme from Uber levels. Water Shuriken is such a strong and consistent move with specs but is severely limited until you nab a KO, it can be handy but is leagues below the full version.
All in all I disagree with Ash Gren to S, I think the limitations of transforming to full power hold it back enough, certainly as unique Pokemon and not a mega, Ash gren would be S.
EDIT: Totally disagree with a Weavile drop, that Mon is great rn
im acutally tired of this rhetoric as it's tone deaf and pretty much like -_-, like nigga please. to be specific I mean:" the limitations of transforming to full power hold it back enough." Like you've got to be kidding me. For starters, theres a reason 2 of the most broken mons in the tier are paired with each other (magearna and ash gren) and it's not remotely a coincidence that sacking gives them boosts in power. There teams are made for shit like that and lets not act like everything is in a vacuum. To continue lets say I guess ur the specs set - which i used to do - what if ur not? What if ur protean, what if that set just kod my counter.... theres so many things wrong with ninja and ur gonna say it has issues transforming? Unless ur brining a chansey every game what the hell are u talking about, when has greninja EVER had an issue transforming. BTW that's not a rhetorical question, that is an open question to literally everyone on this thread. When in the history of sun/moon, has your ash gren ever had an issue getting it's kill to transform(other than chansey)? You are acting like it doesn't have revenge killing potential easily and can just uturn or pick off weakened mons. tired of that ridiculous statement