This is not meant as an off-topic post, but I do think we need to have a better definition of balanced. We have spreads all over the place, here. I mean, maybe I do not understand the concept exactly, but it seems a lot of the spreads are tilted heavily toward defense. I originally had 115 HP / 105 Defense / 95 Sp.Def with a much slower, slightly weaker Pokemon, but when I read about the stress of "balance" with keeping offenses (attack, special attack, speed) and defenses (HP, defense, special defense) generally similar, I adjusted my spread to 115 HP / 95 Defense / 70 Sp.Def. Looking over all of the other spreads, I can't help but feel I misunderstood. I have no qualms with it, really, and I don't mind if my spread loses (it was an honor enough to have my spread for Revenankh chosen, as it is). So, please do not think that I'm just trying to complain for the sake of poor sportsmanship. I simply think that we should try to very clearly define balance (as well as other categories) as best as we possibly can next time.
It is nice to see a lot of different kinds of spreads though, and the more I look at Time Mage's, the more I think it deserves some love. People forget how effective his spread would be. It's easily durable enough to switch in on many threats, fast enough for its job, and has a low enough HP to pretty much beat anything without a choice item or super-effective move one-on-one.
It is nice to see a lot of different kinds of spreads though, and the more I look at Time Mage's, the more I think it deserves some love. People forget how effective his spread would be. It's easily durable enough to switch in on many threats, fast enough for its job, and has a low enough HP to pretty much beat anything without a choice item or super-effective move one-on-one.