Okay, I thought that this thing died, suffocating under all the crowd of threads in here but.. seems like it's still alive !
- So yea, as everybody said,
Ghosts fall short of being a Staple due to the few number of ghosts actually available. On top of that, we all agree that the buff affects the offensive side of the
Ghost typing. However ! It's obvious that
,
and such, don't give too many ducks about that offensive buff.
To put it simply,
is definitely the flavor of the early XY, and for good reasons. Sadly, not enough ghosts can surf on the same wave to turn them into a solid Staple.
- Second thing mentionned is
Knock Off. I'd say that, even if a large portion of the teams share this move (because it's that good), it's still not a Staple. At least not yet. I've checked the SPL XY OU games, and half the teams had this move. Funny fact, every game so far was "team with
Knock Off vs team without
Knock Off", and so far, none of the teams with
Knock Off won ! (that's definitely a crappy statement to base an analysis on though).
So I'm not gonna put it as a Staple yet (because it's not on EVERY team), I'd say that it's borderline staple. Which means, that it's strongly up to discussion !
Now, about the three main posts posted since my last recap :
Soulfly 's comment: Prankster are really good, no one would argue against this statement. I don't think that Pranksters will make it to the Staple level though. Beside
and
, you don't see it that much. And still,
so far all the teams from SPL used NO PRANKSTER. So I don't see it becoming a Staple, blame it on the pokemons sharing this ability (while few are good, many are decent at best).
Kairyu_Gen1 's comment : Whats left is the Status Absorber and the "Steel check".
So first, I won't put Status Absorbing as Staple as I mentionned before. Unless everybody runs Guts, Natural Cure or Magic Coat. I mean, sure, every team has a way to play around Poison, Burn and such, but it's too vague honnestly and it's more like "pokemon common sense" than a XY OU staple.
About the Steel check, it's too much of a corollary related to the Steel Staple. It doesn't add much honnestly.
Ojama 's comment : Calling into question the
Electric immunity is legit and it was probably the most discreet staple from last gen. It's a "have a Ground type" synonym that can be put on the line (like Knock Off). Still, from the SPL team, 5 out of 6 had a Ground pokemon and the only one remaining was able to resist Eletric attacks so easily that it's not even funny (and I want to stress, that it's not about beating Electric pokemons at all, but more about how good having an immunity to something is good and easy to get).
For the
Dragons, they should be put on the line aswell apparently. Lati@s are indeed everywhere given how handy the Defog can come, which adds to their initial insane presence during the battle. That's 4 teams out of 6 so far using Dragons (all using Lati@s) and a total of 6 Dragons (with two teams using "Double Dragons"!). It's fucking incredible (excuse me) to notice that so far NO FAIRY pokemon has been seen in the tournament. I find it pretty big.
However, I want to be sure, so I'm asking,
aren't Lati@s just the best Defog users ? (at least for Offensive, Balanced teams, which then, goes with the
Hazard Control Staple).
Fire types. 5 teams out of 6 have used a
Fire pokemon (and the one that didn't lost its game and probably should have used one to win -if you see which team I'm talking about-). So yea, I didn't suspect this one myself, but it seems pretty solid so I'm waiting to see the discussion about it.
The other points are, as you said, not large enough to be Staples by themselves ("have a check to X"), but can be the source of future Staples (because you want a Pinsir check, you need a Fly resistance for instance -I'm just tossing it here randomly, don't get carried about it-).
PS : I'm not tagging you/your posts because I'm starting a conversation. I just take what sounds good (and what has been repeated before), and what could be debatable in order to justify the OP changes.
So yea, don't take it as me replying to you, it's more like me doing the selecting for the OP, opposing everybody's opinions, vetoing/mitigating some points because they don't fit the Staple's definition I want to respect.
PS² : I'll be
REALLY trying to add "competitive" input from the SPL, because that's way more solid and impactful than the ladder. These teams are all supposed to be highly viable, so they should be respecting the Staples more than others.