<1200 on the ladder, there's a lot of noobs. But honestly, for every 10-20 I play vs. the ladder there, I maybe get 1-2 that are interesting enough to post about. That doesn't make the rest any less bad, but there's a difference between people who failed to stop a Volcarona sweep because their Stone Edge misses, and those who fail to stop it because they're spamming Will-o-Wisp. There's also a difference between seeing a Bisharp with Stone Edge (silly because I'm not too sure what he's trying to hit with it, but not really worth posting about if that's the only thing weird he has), and seeing a Keldeo with Stone Edge (special attacker with far better options than running a physical attack in the 4th slot).
Out of the noobs I do get, there's 3 categories of awful:
1. Awful sets - these are the people who are running shit like mixed Haxorus with Attract, "bulky" Infernape with Toxic and Roar, and Dynamic Punch Gengar. Usually the majority of things that make it to this topic.
2. Awful teams - These are the teams with Tyranitar and Shedinja on the same team, Shedinja with nothing that can remove rocks, 5 things on the team weak to Ground but not enough offensive presence for that to not matter, etc. Usually not interesting enough to post about in and of itself if they just have a couple of outclassed things.
3. Awful decision making - People who keep Hydreigon in on Sylveon, spam toxic against a Scizor while it sets up, etc. One misplay is usually not enough to warrant making it to this topic (such as if a Scizor is out on a Charizard and the Charizard uses Solar Beam - he probably expected his opponent to switch to his water type), but several turns of horrible decisions is silly.
So, if someone is using a Torterra, that doesn't necessarily make it to the topic for me, since it's not interesting enough in and of itself (especially if the set they use makes sense and his decisions mostly make sense as well).
