SDPass or SubPass is not walled by Aegislash and can both sweep and support its team. It needs a lot of support and it is situational, but this is true for most of the Pokemon in C- rank.Can we move Hawlucha to D or just remove it? It's weak, easy to wall, easy to cripple, easy to revenge, and its "best" set (Unburden) gets exactly one chance to sweep and forces it to go itemless. It offers nothing significant other sweepers don't have while also being hard countered by Aegislash, one if the most common and threatening Mons in the tier.
it has been mentioned a hundred of times but i will say it again: Ranks are not formed only from discussion that takes place in this thread, but from discussion that takes place on irc, pms, and any other way in general. I have talked with a few players whose opinion i value and they agreed with this change, so it happened. You can argue about it to be raised, and if your and others make valid points it may as well do, but don't assume the rank changes just happened on a whim.So umm... there wasnt any discussion on kyurem-black. why did you move it down? there's no way in hell its worse than rotom and comparable to the likes of scolipede, and you seem to know little or nothing of kyurem-b. 4 attacks kyurem-b is the best kyurem-b, sub is inferior. second, you seem to be ignoring its wonderful 125/100/90 bulk. its NOT easy to revenge kill outside of super effective STAB moves, and while its typing is shitty, its not keeling over and dying to stuff like talonflame. just please, at least get some discussion on something before you drop it out of the blue.
I completely agree with you on Kyube this thing has no way dropped in viability it's stat spread alone means it can run a revenge killer scarf set, a wallbreaker life orb set or hell even band and a wonderful stallbreaker with the sub set or even a specially defensive set with roost although that's better done by Kyurem-N. A solid A mon IMOI am actually really quite annoyed that kyube has dropped. Kyube is an excellent Pokemon because as well as having great offensive pressure and destroying slower bulkier teams, it checks quite a few Pokemon on offence such as thundy w/o focus blast, belly drum azum and mega gyara which are all huge pains for offence. Although the LO set is great, I think the reason this thing should go back to A is its amazing scarf set. Kyube's scarf set is absolutely amazing. With insane attack this thing with full attack investment is KOing offensive Pokemon such as thundy with an outrage, something the like of scarf chomp can't. Its scarf set is so powerful and cleans so well. Also, unlike chomp it can destroy lando t, hippo and gliscor which give scarf chomp a huge annoyance. Scarf kyube literally is one of the best if not the best late game cleaners, with an outrage a lot more powerful than chomps, ice beam to get around things that can switch into its outrage and ridiculous bulk for an offensive Pokemon demands that it should move to A because it actually gives you a lot more reasons to use it over chomp. Its LO set is just the icing on the cake, this thing should defiantly move back to A.
I have elaborated in a previous post why I think gliscor should move up, and its pretty similar to what Srn9130 said. Gliscor has superior bulk than lando t, both specially and physically. Has an amazing ability in toxic heal and awesome recovery in roost. Also, people are starting to realise what a great check it is to lando i and aegi, two of the tiers very top threats. Its sub toxic set is also amazing and does a ton to unprepared teams. Move this thing to A- IMO.
Also keep hippo were it is, A is perfect for it. Hippo is great at what it does, wether its sp.defensive or physically defensive it can check a wide variety of Pokemon. But it has some glaring cons. First of all hippo has 4mms. On most sets slack off and stealth rock are mandatory, leaving u to choose from rock slide, eq, toxic, whirlwind ect. This means that it can't do everything its supposed to do in one set. Another con is that it pretty much needs to be at full health to take on things such as zard y, mega mawile zard x ect. If its not at full health zard y can 2ohko it on the switch in while mega mawile and zard x when boosted can take out a slightly weakened hippo. Overall hippo is really good, but its 4mms and the fact that it needs to be almost full health to check the things its supposed to means it is not at the level of other extremely meta defining pokemon in bisharp, keldeo, mega mawile mega gyara ect.
Lastly, I want to argue one more thing. Lando t to move to A-. Lando t is not as good as it was earlier in the meta. I have three/four arguments to why it should drop. Firstly as a rock layer it loses to skarm, mandi and the lati's, arguably the three most common defoggers in the tier. That alone hampers at its stealth rocking ability because if it can't take out the defoggers or loses to their hits they can defog, heal and attack Lando t and easily come out top or just massacre it with a draco meteor/surf. Another problem lando has is its over reliance on its ability to check physical attacks. Firstly, bisharp. Intimidate becomes a con not a pro against this thing. And bisharp can just massacre it with a knock off because of Lando's pretty mediocre defence w/o intimidate. Also, players with double switches can avoid intimidate and severly dent lando t with their attacks. My next point is its unreliable recovery and severe competition for a bulky ground type with gliscor and hippo. Gliscor and hippo can both invest in sp.defence and still have amazing defence, that is something Lando t can not do. Hippo and gliscor can take on aegi better while gliscor can take on lando i better aswell. Also, using lando t means you can not use lando i, one of the metas best pokemon atm. This isn't to much of a problem but it is a little con. Overall lando t's worse bulk than hippo and gliscor, lack of recovery, its over reliance on its ability and the fact that it looses to most of the common defoggers means it should drop to A-.
- sorry for the long post, just heaps to cover.
lol what. The set that does best against both is LO w/ outrage. It doesnt need band because outrage with a little bi of attack investment and LO 2ohko's chansey. It can also check offencive pokemon such as thundy, mega gyara and azum. Scarf also cleans against defencive teams once the steels such as skarm and aegi are gone. Band is probably its worst set IMO.Kyurem-B's awkward speed tier means it needs to run Scarf to be good against offense, but it wants to run Band so it can break Stall. A sub set can theoritcally fuck over both but it still needs Chansey dead before it can wreck Stall and offense breaks the subs quickly (being an Ice-type sucks like that) and force it out/kill it. Being SR weak doesn't help matters.
Band 2HKOs Ferrothon after SR with a resisted attack and doesn't cost you HP each turn barring Rocky Helmets.lol what. The set that does best against both is LO w/ outrage. It doesnt need band because outrage with a little bi of attack investment and LO 2ohko's chansey. It can also check offencive pokemon such as thundy, mega gyara and azum. Scarf also cleans against defencive teams once the steels such as skarm and aegi are gone. Band is probably its worst set IMO.
I love SpDef Hippo and it can slack off almost anything unboosted but then it gets walled by quite a few things and most notably Scizor. It may be good on Sand Rush teams but it can also come as a burden against opposing Sand Rush teams since it sets sand for Balloon Drill which walls it too. I would love to see it at A+ because it does it's job so well but it's just inneffective against a lot of things making it require checks to Keldeo, Azumarill, Scizor, Gliscor. It doesn't like to be Toxic'd by walls and even Skarmory sets a load of Spikes in it's face. Hippowdon is amazing when combined with the right teammates, but a support mon which requires support itself doesn't warrant A+ imo.
In addition, I had been using SpDef Hippowdon as an Aegislash check well before it became popular, and over time realized that it's not a very good check. It needs to Slack Off the Shadow Ball and by doing so gives the opponent a turn to switch out and keep up the pressure. Something which sacrifices momentum to take a hit can't be considered a very solid check. Hippo also generally needs to always be at nearly max HP to check what it needs to.That's true about Chansey being less effective in tours but A- is still kind of harsh for the mon that holds stall together. It's probably the one mon that is a complete must on stall hence it's 'viability' is quite high since all stall teams end up running it. Offense can surely prepare for Chansey on stall, but Chansey on balance is another thing. Chansey on balance can sometimes even afford to be sacked after it sets rocks and paralyzes something. It is set up fodder for some things which is why it wouldn't deserve a rank as high as A+ but I surely believe it's as good as the mons in A viability-wise. Especially things like Ferrothorn and Hippowdown, Hippowdon itself being set-up fodder or walled by loads of things like MScizor, Gengar, Clefable, Balloon DrillSlashTran and Gliscor.
alexwolf@axelwolf In the VR forum, you said you are making a S+ and S- ranking. Will you be giving implimenting that with the current S rank pokemon already sorted to be clarified through more discussion or leave it blank initiatlly while we sort who could go where.
EDIT: weird didnt tag....ah well.
I agree, it is hell for sand teams which have become quite popular. My new team has peaked around 1850 and is very hard pressed to deal with it if it subs, especially if excadrill's air balloon has been popped.I definitely support Gliscor for A-
I've seen a sp. def set running about in a lot of higher end matches I've seen, something like eq/roost/taunt/toxic, with special defense investment, and honestly, its not surprising at all to see why one would consider such a set.
I don't know the exact ev spread, but this Gliscor was taking only about 60%~ from an uninvested Rotom-W's Hydro Pump, Roosting it off, and occasionally Toxic'ing a predicted switch in. Not only does it serve as an excellent answer to aegislash as well, we all know gliscor is no slouch on the defensive spectrum, easily taking anything the dangerous Sand Rush Excadrill can dish out.
Not only that, I can imagine this gliscor set taking on bisharp very well, atleast better than lando-t can, and the only real advantages I'm seeing Lando-T bring over this guy is Intimidate! Gliscor has access to everything else Lando-T can do, just at a much lower strength, in exchange for amazing survivability. It's like a defensive team's lando-T that's....even more defensive!!
But damn it doesn't stop there, this sp. def spread can also check Lando-I if its not Cm! You can toxic, sit back, and roost away as it tries in vain to psychic (gotta watch out for the rare hp ice tho :/ ) This is something Lando-T could never do, atleast not as efficiently (AV lando-t is mediocre frens)
With all the great roles this new set seems to cover, a boost in ranking makes sense. Gliscor for A-
Actually I was the one who posted that. I will let the S+ and S- take action once people nominate for those respective tiers. Right now what I am thinking is:alexwolf In the VR forum, you said you are making a S+ and S- ranking. Will you be giving implimenting that with the current S rank pokemon already sorted to be clarified through more discussion or leave it blank initiatlly while we sort who could go where.
EDIT: weird didnt tag....ah well.