Nobody said Slowbro was weak (Even if they did, I'm sure we can all disagree with it)
Because if it runs any other sets, it needs to forego bulk, therefore making it more 'breakable'. It's best bet in the meta is bulky set up.
Overall, I think I've pointed the council toward a conservative route with bans because that's my own personal preference. What I want to do going forward is be more liberal and favor the metagame as a whole, instead of individual Pokemon. Basically, things are *probably* fine with stuff like MegaBro, Diggersby, and Aegislash around, but [the metagame] would generally be better if they were gone.
DISCLAIMER: he means aegislash overcentralized the OU metagame.Hello Eevee General I hate Diggersby and this is why. Diggersby has always been broken if you ask me, but with ORAS comes Knock Off, changing Diggersby's world. Gengar and Gourgeist are used purely to counter Diggersby, and now they can not even do that. Diggersby is broken because it can beat nearly everything in the entire metagame, force teams to check it through around three ways each, and does not have any solid counters. I'd like to compare it to Aegislash, which overcentralized the metagame, was extremely powerful, and had next to no counters. Thus, I would please love a suspect for it..
Comparing a mon with base 78 speed to a mon with base 123 speed is your first problem. Diggersby is not broken like greninja is, where its just too diverse; diggersby is broken because its too powerful. Explosion is a hilarious win condition that rips whatever mon you use it against to shreds. This is how diggersby is broken: its so powerful it can choose to obliterate a counter just to help a team.Going to post my arguments on why diggersby should be suspected.
The fact is, the combination of insane revenge-killing power and literally no switch-ins makes it suspect worthy in itself.
Revenge killing
There's nothing that's as efficient and powerful at revenge killing in any tier barring balanced hackmons (which, even in that tier full of monstrous stuff, -ate was limited). The combination of STAB, an essentially 120 BP STAB revenge killing combo that overrides all other priority moves, an essentially base 162 base attack stat, and only 3 types that resist/are immune to its revenge killing move are what make this the perfect revenge killer. Of course, there are some arguments that this thing keeps things in check, and it's not too hard to switch-in to diggersby. Oh yeah, and if it can't kill you with the first fake out + extremespeed combo, it can always just switch out, come back in, and use fake out again to rack up damage until you finally die.
However, unlike most revenge killers in other metagames, Diggersby has no switch-ins:
"Switch-ins"
Before ORAS tutors, diggersby wasn't too hard to check, just run something like gengar, air balloon aegislash, mega scizor, bronzong, landorus-therian, or gyarados to beat it. Well, guess what? After ORAS, it could beat all those things with the addition of knock off, thunderpunch, fire punch, ice punch, and it also gained low kick and precipice blades to truly beat out many otherwise-would-be-gimmicky counters to this thing. But after ORAS came out, Mega slowbro was introduced, and it could wall it reliably. But now, with Mega slowbro banned, the only thing that reliably beats it is really Skarmory.
Not to mention that if you switch in, you could risk it setting up, should it be a set-up variant:
Setting up
Using its two main set up moves, belly drum and shell smash, Diggersby can obliterate any would-be check to this thing and pretty much OHKO it at +6 or +2. With shell smash, diggersby can easily set up and sweep teams with its combination of insane speed, power, and priority. With belly drum, diggersby can easily muscle its way through things. And it's not hard for diggersby to find an opportunity to set up; with the amount of offensive pressure it provides, it's actually hard to miss a set up opportunity. The problem with this set up sweeper in particular is that the protect diggersby is the most common set up variant (making it immune to fake out). That means that no pokemon can actually revenge kill this thing once it gets going, due to its +2 priority espeed that OHKOs extremely bulky non-resists at +2 attack or +6 attack, with EQ rounding out the coverage (which is still dangerous on SS due to the speed boosts) You're going to have to rely on unaware or something to beat it, or sacrifice something and send in your sableye, which can still end up getting eaten alive by earthquake.
Conclusion
Imagine Greninja in OU. It's easily one of the most dominant offense shredders/revenge killers in the meta, with its myriad of coverage moves, right? Now imagine greninja with a +2 priority, 80 BP STAB attack, and a +3 priority, 40 BP STAB attack that always flinches. Now imagine that it gets access to shell smash and belly drum, two of the greatest set up moves in existence. Now imagine that it has a 160 base attacking stat. Now imagine that it can't be revenge killed once it sets up and OHKOs pretty much everything in the game. And still, imagine that it can have almost perfect coverage, packed in 2 moves. There's diggersby. It's a Greninja, a Talonflame, a Slaking, and a
And it's not like these roles will fade away with the banning of diggersby. Other normal types can still pull it off, just not half as efficiently as diggersby does. The other normal type fakespeeders are much healthier, able to be checked, and much, much, less powerful (barring ursaring, which loses out on versatility).
By suspecting/banning diggersby, we open up a whole new path of new threats to pass by without entirely taking away the "don't spam set-up pokemon" trademark of STABmons.
.....DID YOU READ HALF OF HIS POST???Broken thing X checking Broken thing Y isn't a reason to keep Broken thing X in the tier. If Diggersby is found to be broken, then surely the metagame moves on from there, and if it causes further suspects due to the fact it kept broken things in check then that has to happen? This also has it's parallels with the OU Aegislash suspect test, in that many people feared the likes of Mega Heracross would be too much to handle in the metagame due to the lack of solid checks outside of Aegislash, who forced them to run suboptimal coverage or to just accept that it lost to it completely. My point is, I shouldn't have to run Diggersby, broken or not, if that's all that stands between me and getting overwhelmed by set-up sweepers. In either case, whether Diggersby is broken or not, those set-up sweepers most certainly are if I'm forced to run a potentially broken mon just to not get beat by them.
Let's be honest: Diggs has 1 legitimately viable set of its three possible (revenge killer, BD, SashSmash), so I'm just going to focus on that one: The infamous FakeSpeed silk scarf bunny.
Despite being extremely strong on it's own, able to power through almost any SINGLE pokemon in the metagame given a flat 1v1 situation, this strength also serves as its greatest curse. The fact that it CANNOT beat the majority of the tier WITHOUT BOTH fake out and extremespeed damage, which not only effectively cuts its moveslot in half, limiting the "amazing" coverage that it gets, but also makes it infinitely easier to switch into. And let's not forget that if Diggersby does get a kill, it isn't that difficult to bring in something like a Scizor and regaining all the lost offensive momentum.
Now, in terms of things that can easily beat Diggersby, very few people actually ran fringe pokemon like Gengar, Gourgeist, and Golurk in XY just for Diggs. They were, despite this merit, most of the time plain bad pokemon. That's just being honest. The real list has always been more along the lines of m-Scizor, Skarmory, Landorus-T, Ferrothorn, Slowbro, Quagsire, and to a lesser extent, Forretress, Aegislash, Chansey, Sableye, Glsicor and Tangrowth. With ORAS, Diggs got Knock Off (which seems to be the reason why people want it to go) but that only allows it to beat, from this list, Chansey, Aegislash, and possibly Slowbro. I know that it also gets the elemental punches, but that limits its coverage to one specific threat and loses out on Knock Off (the best option). On top of this, this list doesn't even include the plethora of offensive steels, rocks, and normals + Togekiss that Diggersby can't even revenge kill (Autotomize Magnezone, Terrakion, DD Tyraitar, Kangaskhan, Stoutland with protect, Bisharp, Scizor, Scarf Heatran, Excadrill, Jirachi)
And while an argument has been raised that different normals could fill the same role while making the metagame "healthier" since they aren't as efficient in the role as Diggersby, his presence in the tier is the reason there is a semblance of balance present currently. With a lack of EFFECTIVE +2 PRIORITY revenge killing, the tier will become flooded with teams that carry too many sweepers to be handled by Sableye and Quagsire, forcing teams to, instead of running a single Diggersby, run a combination of 2 or more checks to setup sweeping. Furhtermore, all it takes to beat Diggersby with setup sweeping is to run something that isn't beat by Diggersby (see below).
With the setup sets that are being hyped, it is not that hard to beat, especially after you know that it isn't a revenge killer. With SS, Fake out is the easiest way to beat it, as it leaves itself as an easy target with defense drops. BD sets are almost useless since they have no answer to anything faster than itself. Not to mention, both of these set can't beat the common, reliable answers to physical setup sweepers in Sableye, Quagsire, Skarmory, or sashKazam. On the topic of protect, while it does allow you to have an easy out to fake out, but limits you to ground and normal coverage, which while normally good, are the 2 STABs that any good team is most prepared to beat.
One last point: Sometimes something is very good, efficient and powerful. This does not make it broken. You may not like having to deal with something being a "staple" in the tier, and you may not like the fact that you have to consider the top-tier threats while you teambuild, lest you have a bad team. Sometimes there's a strategy that works and you don't like the way it functions, or having to deal with it. Unfortunately for you, this does not make something banworthy, and you just need to deal with making better plays and playing around or with it.
.....DID YOU READ HALF OF HIS POST???
A little footnote of his main point was that diggersby is important for keeping the meta intact (which idk why you argue with him - its not broken thing Y, its broken everything normal). His main point was that non rking sets aren't even that good, which I can say from experience is true, and there are tons of checks to the RK set. Aegislash is no comparison here: It had multiple viable sets that were all effective. Diggersby's boosting sets can't say the same - it has 2 really...useful sets. the first is spikes, the second is the SS or LO Revenge killer, the second being the only one that could be broken, and it has tons of checks.
Unless you want to ban the normal type and Geomancy, these "broken sweepers" can't really be banned. And I know based on what you said in that post that you are going to single out this sentence and say that "i disagree so your entire argument is wrong" because thats basically what you just did.
m-Scizor, Skarmory, Landorus-T, Ferrothorn, Slowbro, Quagsire, and to a lesser extent, Forretress, Aegislash, Chansey, Sableye, Glsicor and Tangrowth.
Thats a lot of checks. Most of them CAN switch in. With the introduction of mega slowbro, you are given what is basically a counter that is also an absurdly good mon in itself. Knock off doesn't beat any of the 6 primary checks/counters listed, and one of them can be used on any team for much more than diggersby.
Sacrificing for one mon coverage is simple. Its more like running non roost megazard X - you can choose to beat rhyperior and quagsire (grass knot), azumarill and other waters (tpunch), or lant (ice punch). All come at an opportunity cost: Having access to moves that can beat so called checks and counters does not make something broken. Oh you want more? Did being able to run tpunch mega medicham make it broken? no. Having the ability to run extrasensory on greninja to beat mvenu in early XY? no. Greninja in XY could also use a ton of different moves to beat various mons, but that didn't make it broken then. Greninja is arguably broken now because its recently newfound coverage makes it nearly uncounterable without opportunity cost. Diggersby running one of the many moves for just one or two of its specific counters comes at the opportunity cost of not being able to run any other move in that slot. Just like megazard X. Just like xy greninja. Just like Mega Medicham. Not at all like ORAS greninja. Or XY Aegislash, which many thought wasn't broken in the first place.
What, are you gonna say "its too good" to be able to beat some of its supposed counters? I am tremendously sorry you don't understand what a lure is. A lure is designed to change its own checks and counters and get kills as a result. I am even more sorry you can't handle a powerful lure without calling it broken.
The Opportunity cost of running those moves is the cost of not running others. If you run fire punch on it, you can't beat landorus-t, Slowbro, Quagsire, Chansey, Gliscor, or Driftblim/whatever niche irrelevant counter people act like is necessary. If you run explosion you are beaten by gengar, ferrothorn, skarmory (since it can't KO them), and many ghosts in general, besides being somewhat easy to play around.
If you think Diggersby is broken, I feel sorry for you. Realizing that any mon that COULD beat your supposed checks/counters is broken isn't a realization, its completely frustration-oriented that your check/counter may not always be good. OH WELL. Lures are a part of pokemon, and having one mon that beats your check/counter at a certain opportunity cost DOES NOT MAKE IT BROKEN.
Good Day.
Also, Please stop acting like children in chats as well. There was basically a screaming match earlier...calm your tits.
Eevee General said:That being said, the last suspect decision on Slowbronite is reversed and banned.