On another note, I honestly feel like this theme's d1 has no basis for anything. We basically just have to hope we lynch Backup/Vampire and then go from there.
Unvote, Vote Champ1604
Unvote, Vote Champ1604
Mainly because he hasn't said anything, and as you'll soon come to learn, I don't like people in the game that I can't read.and why do you vote champ there?
Walrein what are you basing your sandshrewz read on, I haven't seen much of anything out of him.K whatever people are missing the point of playing a non-traditional game if they just wanna do the same bs they always do
Obviously the only reason I would break the game is because I'm town, nothing I've said makes any sense from a vampire perspective and Walrein in particular should know that quite obviously
I think wanting to lynch the backup makes it likely you are town, however, the fact that half of your plan is a blatant vampire win doesn't make me comfortable to say you are town. Ultimately I read you as probably town because you're generally pretty bad at tunneling on a non-scum and I'm not scum.
zorbees is purposefully being dense as is MoodyCloud, and I think both are likely to be some combination of Vampire or Backup, which are the two most desirable lynches today even for those who want to play the 'old-fashioned way', which is not how this game is meant to be played. Hell, the whole point of a game like this is to think outside the box and get outside your comfort zone, not just go through the motions claiming you have a philosophical difference with playing new and unique games.
Who are you to say what the point of the game is or how it should be played? Let everyone have their own opinion on it.
Lynch zorbees (Unbolded since my responses are bold)
Open to being convinced otherwise but I have never seen zorbees to think that you don't play a game to win it. He has demonstrated this pattern over a decade and, while I agree with it, he is not demonstrating it this game. I don't buy his explanation of 'obviously I'm not following trends because I signed up for an NOC' - that's not a reason to think he would suddenly change his whole philosophy on how to play mafia.
My OC strategy and my NOC strategy are completely different. I only joined this game in the first place because Texas confirmed that there would be short deadlines, which is my preference. You should know how much I got fed up with NOCs in the past; hell, me and jumpluff threw a game by godkilling ourselves just because the game was too much. If I'm playing a NOC, I want the game to be reasonably fun, and I don't think playing for a personal victory by openly playing both sides in a NOC is any fun.
I read the most fear of my obvious strategy to ensure vanillas win en masse into zorbees and then MoodyCloud, go back and read their posts and note the difference between their reactions and most others', particularly Asek's. The reasonable vanilla response, if you want to play things traditionally, is to say 'I don't think that's how we should play a game like this / how the game is meant to be played', which I can 100% promise you is not the case, this game was meant to be played with vanillas keeping their options open and thinking on their feet instead of being sheep.
I never feared your strategy, I'm just philosophically opposed to it. I had the exact response that you called "the reasonable vanilla response". And as I said before, who are you to tell people how the game is meant to be played.
In other news the backup claiming is the most obvious of all obvious strategies and anyone who does not acknowledge this is either the Vampire or someone who wants to win with the Vampire.
Honestly I'm fine lynching the Backup, but I don't think the Backup is just going to claim and get himself lynched when half of your strategy involves winning with the vampire, which the dead backup can no longer do.
why are you looking for "the consensus on who to lynch" or to put in simpler terms the bandwagon for you to hop on? this isn't town behaviour omgI'm not seeing any consensus on who to lynch, but if it helps I'm not backup
when asked for reads he only gives reads on the.. idk how to get this across. OK i feel like sam / zorbees are this pop duo performing live and everyone else is the backup dancers rn and him only commenting on them rather than giving a read on some obscure player (or any other player for that matter) feels like he's been going over the thread trying to provide a reads post in response to Asek rather than actively looking for and considering the connotations of people's postsI feel like Zorbees is acting pretty scummy but I don't think any actual scum would be so aggressive, so I'm thinking that he's town. Otherwise I'm not getting much of a read on anyone else except for Sam possibly being vamp/backup trying to throw off suspicion in the most convuleted way possible
you had a basis. For other players.i mean its d1 you cant really have a basis when nothing has really happened yet
I can't find the post so I either misread something which is totally possible since I just woke up when I read the posts or just dreamed about it which also is possible
his last post was 12 hours before this making it scummy because he doesn't comment on anything that went down and then starts going after lurkers which is really easy for scum to do to sound towny. He doesn't lynch acid either which on d1 and considering the fact he tagged him for lurking doesn't sit right with me either this looks like another case of fishing for towncred. I also think his posts have been scummy ever since he bolded it's time to NOCThe two archtypes I'd want to lynch the most today are parroters and idlers
acidphoenix what's your excuse
asek bro just wanted to point this out. Us having a big townie bloc today by virtue of their being only 1 vamp doesn't actually help us that much. Like. The thing that usually trips up scum is that they have to either go with the town bloc against one of their buddies or find contrived reasons NOT to do that. And the 1 vamp doesn't have any buddies to protect so he just goes with the flow
Unvote Vote Acidphoenixthose 40 minutes were the past 40 minutes but I have like five minutes on phone so
unclesams post: in concept I agree although if vamps win at majority then it is always unsound logic for any given townie to aim for a vamp win(I think? didn't go into it much more than "less than half of people who are current town are gonna win then")
again not going into it much because not much time but lynching a pr(it doesn't matter which) is beneficial for everyone with POSSIBLY the exception of the pr lynch(losing vamp potential)
I read the thread somrehat
I lied Unvote lynch earlio
still subject to change but honestly earlio is the only scumlean that feels legitimate (reasons zorbees / hawkie have said mostly, also constantly putting up his... I dunno a word but things like "can't be top poster" "don't wanna bandwagon")
going back to bigpost if vamps CAN win via maj then it's what 1v10 plus a viggish BUT only realistically works if vamp calls for their own sacrifice(doctor / backup / hunter all technically work but ensure their own demise if we follow that plan)
I'm getting out of the car in fifteen seconds so there you go
apparently I lost part of this post by using an autosaved draft oops
here's what I had as of autosave no time to properly fix
those 40 minutes were the past 40 minutes but I have like five minutes on phone so
unclesams post: in concept I agree although if vamps win at majority then it is always unsound logic for any given townie to aim for a vamp win(I think? didn't go into it much more than "less than half of people who are current town are gonna win then")
again not going into it much because not much time but if first guess is right. ynchin a pr(it doesn't matter which) is beneficial for everyone with POSSIBLY the exception of the pr lynch(losing vamp potential; again I haven't actually done math just glances)
I read the thread somewhat but not with a sufficiently critical eye so I'll just get in reads in if I can
unclesam I think he makes that post 80% if town 100% if vamp but with the thing zorbees said I'm going to put it as nri
looking through later responses again Unvote vote unclesam for now, definitely not for the bigpost but later responses, very subject to change
zorbees I dunno honestly
asek nonpr probably
in retrospect this is more than five minutes
i really dislike inactivity excuses but then again Blue_Tornado literally asked for ityesterday i was lazy
today has went: take act / go to taco bell / have like forty minutes at home / leave for soccer party
tomorrow i'll be active or at least.. more