I think a lot of people are misinterpreting "uber."
Saying Deoxys-E is "uber" because steel pokemon can counter it is completely half-assed argument.
Were are voting on its affect on the Metagame and if it should go up in teirs. There are OU counters for many uber pokemon right now and that doesn't change their status. The point I want to make to anyone else voting without a good deal of knowledge of what their talking about is that is Deoxys negatively impacting the metagame? Is he helping the metagame? My stance was already said in my vote so I won't repeat it. But I encourage some better reasons than "Deoxys-E never sweeps me so it can't be uber" and "Pokemon X can sweep just as good as Deoxys-E so he's OU." That's like saying Ninjask can baton pass just as good as Mew.. which means... absolutely nothing.
Uhh, if a pokemon is countered by pokemon of an entire type, then it's kind of not a half-assed argument...
Why the heck should Deoxys-S have to be helping the metagame to be allowed? The only pokemon that's really "helping" the metagame is Blissey. Also, I just gave you a very good reason as to why I believe that Deoxys-S is helping the metagame, but it doesn't appear that you listened to it.
What's wrong with people speaking from their own experiences? Not everyone has to say the same thing over and over about how it "hurts offensive teams" or something. If they say that DX-S never sweeps them, then that's a valid reason for them to vote the way that they want, since they're talking about their experiences facing the thing, which is the kind of stuff we want as well as the impact and such.
Also, every uber is going to feel like it's had a negative impact on the game when it's brought down! When you bring in a new threat, people are going to try their hardest to counter the thing, and if certain pokemon start becoming less used and some becoming more used, we can't just send it right back to uber because a couple of pokemon start to get excluded. How else are we going to move ANYTHING down if we have that kind of attitude?
Tangerine -
I don't totally support the Thunder Wave argument anymore, though I was just using that recently as a point that it was "vunerable to status". I'm not trying to use theorymon here, I play the game just as much as you do. Ok, I'll agree that some of my arguments aren't as clear as they should be, and I will try to fix that.
I'll agree that there are much more slower bulky sweepers in the game, there's no denying that. However, this has led to people wanting "parasupport" for their teams, as they don't want their main sweepers, which are no longer always extremely fast to be outsped. This has led a lot of people to using a paralysis move on their team, which is where I got that statement from. It's also not a terrible idea for teams to carry both Toxic Spikes and Thunder Wave, since it helps greatly against Togekiss and Salamence, as well as Azelf and Lucario, since one of them can flinchhax you if you if it's not paralyzed itself, and it helps a lot against the other three since they have the potential to sweep your team.
Deoxys-S may take hits a lot better than some of the pokemon in OU, but honestly, not by much. With the Hasty Nature, even neutral attacks lay the pounding on it, especially if they're physical because of the -Def nature. This leads to you question about if I have played an offensive team or not. Yes, I have played an offensive team, but Deoxys-S has a boatload of trouble switching into the hard-hitters on those types of teams. I am aware that it can just come in on a revenge-kill, but there is also no guarantee that it can OHKO, and coupled with the Life Orb damage plus the hit it takes if it doesn't OHKO, a huge amount of its life is gone, and that's what I meant when I said that Deoxys-S doesn't give offensive teams a humongous amount of trouble. I guess I did make a bit of a bold statement when I said that Rapid Spinners should be on offensive teams, but I had one on my previous offensive team and it helped a lot. Whatever, I guess that was a pretty stupid statement then. Yeah, and the next two statements (ugh, wow I look like a retard, sorry about this).
Umm, about the next statement, I said "from what you said", because I was interpreting something he said? I listened to the argument and I didn't agree with it. If you have to set up 3 layers of spikes, a layer of stealth rock, two layers of Toxic Spikes, have all counters gone, have everything else below 50%, and have Deoxys-S in perfect condition in order for it to sweep, and I don't agree with that argument, why should I have to?
Yes, Kyogre may have counters in OU, but they're extremely shaky counters. You can't seriously tell me that Ludicolo and Quagsire count as counters to it, since they don't even have recovery. I'm not sure why people keep on citing Kyogre when they try to counter the "counters" argument, because it doesn't work. Ok, fine, I guess that you're supposed to use all 6 pokemon, since it is a team game. However, all I was wondering was what would happen Bronzong was forced to face one of its supposed counters. Honestly, you may think that it's so easy to just "make sure that Bronzong never ever survives", but all the Bronzong user has to do is, y'know, just not bring out Bronzong, unless you're implying that every team has a phazer.
Yeah, I won't compare pokemon anymore, sorry about that. The taking my experiences "lightly" is an odd statement for you to make, especially since it's not "most people". If I stop Garchomp with the Jumpluff set that I used, when why should people take it "lightly"? Why the fuck did I even post that if people are just going to take it "lightly"? I was hesistant to post that Jumpluff set, and honestly, maybe I should just keep my team members to myself from now on if people obviously aren't going to care. If I've never had problems with Garchomp when using that Jumpluff, why is that so hard to believe? Just because a lot of people have problems with it, it doesn't mean that everyone has to, and it sure as hell doesn't mean that they're not supposed to be taken seriously. Sorry, but it just kinda pisses me off because I'm actually trying here, but it doesn't look like my arguments are very good.
I'll try to make my arguments into less statements and such if it'll help people take me more seriously. You are right, I do tend to need other people to make a point before I can make a valid point, and I really do want to fix that. If I expand my arguments too much, people will most likely just not read them because they'll be too long, I can't create a balance it seems. Thanks for the compliment about the offensive teams thing, and at least knowing that I have insight in the game. I assure you, that I am not using theorymon, just that my arguments have a bad format that I have never been famous for. Sorry Tangie, I'll try harder. :(