***[VOTE] The final Deoxys-S "discussion" thread***

Status
Not open for further replies.
i honestly think the majority of d-e users on shoddy do not use it properly. you simply cannot break this thing out in its early stages. its type coverage makes it pretty much impossible to stop late game. the only slight counters to it are the psychic-steels, scarf chomp/gengar or a revenge killing sucker puncher. i think that's too much to ask since none of them can take repeated beatings (the opponent can switch it out too). therefore i believe that deoxys-e is uber.

If the majority of people do not use it properly, would that not point to it needing a large degree of skill to use it the way you are describing? The same can be said for Lucario...so is it Uber too?

No, we can't agree on this. If this was true, then why are these two pokemon even up for debate? Deoxys-S does tip the favor against certain styles of playing, a point that so far you have not been able to actually refute. You and Logann both have given me "use Dugtrio". Get some experience with the type of team I am talking about before trying to tell me what to use. If you had actually any experience, you would know that Dugtrio does NOT fit into sweeping offensive teams.

If you take a look at Deoxys-S's counters, the only thing that MAY be able to fit into the teams that I'm talking about is Metagross. I'll list them below for your convenience.

Feel free to continue telling me to "just use Dugtrio" and that "Deoxys-S doesn't fuck up sweeping offensive teams" You have yet to post any proof of this.

I will tell you to look at one of my previous posts, where i plainly and concisely stated thta the type of team you are talking about...the team you GAVE ME AS AN EXAMPLE is NOT DEOXYS WEAK! I have never said "just slap Duggy on there", I said that if you are really that worried about it, use a fast, powerful, OFFENSIVE poke (dugtrio) to stop it. What if your team doesn't have a Curse-Swine (which I use to great effect) counter, and is swept 6-0. Is Mamoswine Uber because it erased your "style of play"?!?!?!?!?! NO! It isn't.

A " specific team" and a style of play are two very different things, and you also have, as of yet, given me no battle logs, no experiences, no statistics, no actual evidence whatsoever, that Deo E has restricted this type of play. Please show some, or drop your argument, because it just isn't true.



IPL, this topic is not about Wobbufet, please do not make it so. Maybe Wobby is found Uber and thats why your team does well, not Deo-E. This finding would in fact ruin your entire argument because you used an "Uber" on the team and thus contaminated nay resulting conclusions.
 
No, you misunderstood me Lover of Raikous. That's my point. All offense teams are more Physically oriented. And not the opposite, due to one pokemon. Blissey. How is that any different. Blissey does a good deal of crippling all offense just as much as DS-X does.

Er

Blissey doesn't even stop special sweeping 100%.

Specsluke needs SR but it can beat Calm Bliss on the switch.

CM Jirachi + Mismagius destroy it 100% of the time.

Bliss needs T-Wave to touch NP Togekiss with Aura Sphere.

Give me a comparable example in regards to pure offensive teams and Deoxys-E.
 
I will tell you to look at one of my previous posts, where i plainly and concisely stated thta the type of team you are talking about...the team you GAVE ME AS AN EXAMPLE is NOT DEOXYS WEAK! I have never said "just slap Duggy on there", I said that if you are really that worried about it, use a fast, powerful, OFFENSIVE poke (dugtrio) to stop it. What if your team doesn't have a Curse-Swine (which I use to great effect) counter, and is swept 6-0. Is Mamoswine Uber because it erased your "style of play"?!?!?!?!?! NO! It isn't. A " specific team" and a style of play are two very different things, and you also have, as of yet, givne me no battle logs, no experiences, no statistics, no actual evidence whatsoever, that Deo E has restricted this type of play. Please show some, or drop your argument, because it just isn't true.
Are you assuming that Ancien Regime, IggyBot, jrrrrrr, Jabba, and IPL are telling you of their experiences out of nowhere, or that they're "terrible battlers"? Give us a freaking break, your statements just show how ignorant you really are when it comes to competitive Pokemon.

The only reason you say there is no evidence is because you're discrediting them for no good reason other than "WELL YOU COULD DO THIS INSTEAD" or "USE DUGTRIO", which is a pretty crappy argument since the style of the team itself avoids Dugtrio for a reason.

If you're not going to listen to us then why should we listen to your "arguments" that are completely going around the point and saying that "see? i went around the point, it doesnt exist"

Drop this argument. You do not get it, and we're not going to be so infinitely patient to listen to you spew this kind of nonsense. Comparing Mamoswine to Deoxys E is retarded, so is saying "just add Dugtrio to your offensive team" considering that's not how offensive teams work at all (Dugtrio isn't offensive, it only revenge kills, nor can Dugtrio switch in using a resistance since its defenses are like wet toilet paper). This is a warning. You clearly don't know what you're talking about even though you claim to.

IPL, this topic is not about Wobbufet, please do not make it so. Maybe Wobby is found Uber and thats why your team does well, not Deo-E. This finding would in fact ruin your entire argument because you used an "Uber" on the team and thus contaminated nay resulting conclusions.
What the hell are you even talking about? IPL posted for a reason and Deoxys E is directly involved in what he was saying, so I recommend you really start reading our posts or else you will be considered a troll. This goes for ALL of you.

DO NOT go offtopic again.
 
Deoxys-S, at best, can score Super-Effective hits on something like 12 out of 17 types (my type chart is downstairs) with Psychic / Bolt / Beam / Fighting move. How hard is it to pack a Bug, Fire, Psychic, Ghost, or Electric type on your team? Is forcing a team to account for you in its conception something that is overcentralizing?

Actually, let me stop right there as that's not a bad or rhetorical question. "Is forcing a team to account for you in its conception something that is overcentralizing?" Let's take the limited example of pure sweeping teams. Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves. Is accounting for something in a team building process only required because something is broken?

I'll argue "no". Why? Because there are a lot of threats teams of many kinds have to account for. Crush King stops stall teams unprepared for him. Is Crush King Uber because the stall team has to account for Crush King? No. If you think "Yes" is the answer, you'll be up all night talking about how xyz is so broken.

Sorry that this is very stream-of-conciousness style, I just write a lot when I think people are wrong. I know it's unorganized and nigh-incoherent. I'm sleepy. The below text is me trying to make the same argument for Deoxys being uber as Aerodactyl being Uber. I thought it was inferior to the point above, so yeah. Read if you really want...

Okay, let's pretend Choice Scarf doesn't exist. Aerodactyl is faster than the entire game except for Deoxys E, has plenty of coverage, and a decent Attack stat that's even better than Deoxys-E. Is Aerodactyl broken? My Metagross / Salamence / Starmie / Heatran / Exeggutor / Heracross team is designed to straight up sweep. Aerodactyl 2HKO's the entire team with EQ / Stone Edge / Crunch / Aerial Ace. Is he Uber?

Now I know that example looks incredibly pointless and even worse than theorymon, but think about it. Is Aerodactyl a complete stop to this full sweeping team? Not really. Metagross has Meteor Mash, Starmie has Surf, Heatran might have HP Something, Heracross hits it neutral and KO's it. But it still has "ample" opportunity to switch in on stuff, like Metagross Earthquake, Heatran Earth Power / Flamethrower if it's lucky... so is in this case Aerodactyl Uber for breaking teams with a bunch of sweepers since he's faster and has a good movepool? If you're sane, you'd say no. He wasn't Uber in RSE and if you throw HP Ghost into slot 3 and your favorite Fire type in Team Slot 4 the same arguments can be made.
 
Are you assuming that Ancien Regime, IggyBot, jrrrrrr, Jabba, and IPL are telling you of their experiences out of nowhere, or that they're "terrible battlers"? Give us a freaking break, your statements just show how ignorant you really are when it comes to competitive Pokemon.

The only reason you say there is no evidence is because you're discrediting them for no good reason other than "WELL YOU COULD DO THIS INSTEAD" or "USE DUGTRIO", which is a pretty crappy argument since the style of the team itself avoids Dugtrio for a reason.

If you're not going to listen to us then why should we listen to your "arguments" that are completely going around the point and saying that "see? i went around the point, it doesnt exist"

Drop this argument. You do not get it, and we're not going to be so infinitely patient to listen to you spew this kind of nonsense. Comparing Mamoswine to Deoxys E is retarded, so is saying "just add Dugtrio to your offensive team" considering that's not how offensive teams work at all (Dugtrio isn't offensive, it only revenge kills, nor can Dugtrio switch in using a resistance since its defenses are like wet toilet paper). This is a warning. You clearly don't know what you're talking about even though you claim to.



What the hell are you even talking about? IPL posted for a reason and Deoxys E is directly involved in what he was saying, so I recommend you really start reading our posts or else you will be considered a troll.

1. If we are deciding about Deoxys, and the evidence he is using specifically states that Wobbufet is an integral part of his team, it most certainly taints the conclusions he found. I have read every word of these posts, so do not insult me again by saying I have not.

2. I have not said "just use Dugtrio". I have said that he is an option, and please also remember that nobody has yet given me an example of a team with synergy, that is fast-paced offensive, and deoxys weak. All the teams mentioned thus far with that style of play have had a counter to deoxys. Do you think this is just by chance? I think it is because many pokes can counter deoxys, and you are ignoring them. You forget how weak its neutral hits are, and just how many fast sweepers can actually take them.

3. Please do not call me a troll simply because I oppose your side of the argument and ask for evidence. Every one of these posts is on topic, and I still have not received any hard evidence. I am the only one who has presented evidence at all, in the usage statistics that are virtually unchanged since Deo-E was introduced. If its so good, why isn't it highe rup on the list?

4. The mamo comparison was perfectly reasonable, much more-so than the rampant Blissey one. If your team is ripped apart by one poke, is that poke automatically Uber? That is essentially what you are saying.
 
The only reason you say there is no evidence is because you're discrediting them for no good reason other than "WELL YOU COULD DO THIS INSTEAD" or "USE DUGTRIO", which is a pretty crappy argument since the style of the team itself avoids Dugtrio for a reason.
This isn't a valid arguement either. If a team no longer works, you either adapt or lose. D-S doesn't stop you from playing an offensive sweeper team, it stops you from playing a 6 pokemon sweeper team, there is a difference.

The arguements against D-S are that people who change their teams (gasp) then force you to change your team (gasp) or lose. This is what people would refer to as a changing metagame. People who want to ban D-S refuse to change their strategies, and thus doom themselves to losing.

If D-S centralises the metagame, then under no definition he can be decentralising I would take it. D-S removes straight up 6 sweeper teams, and forces them to broaden slightly. Removing something centralises, broadening obviously decentralises, so stating that D-S centralises is false. He does both. They are inseperable, if you argue he is centralising you must also admit he decentralises. (and if you take a logic class, a negative does not implicitly mean both, but positive does).

So the overall effect of D-S is decentralising the metagame by forcing certain teams to adjust. He is certainly OU.
 
Er

Blissey doesn't even stop special sweeping 100%.

Specsluke needs SR but it can beat Calm Bliss on the switch.

CM Jirachi + Mismagius destroy it 100% of the time.

Bliss needs T-Wave to touch NP Togekiss with Aura Sphere.

Give me a comparable example in regards to pure offensive teams and Deoxys-E.
er
You don't need to spell out these things for me, I play pokemon too. I know Blissey doesn't literally take every special pkmn.
Dx-s doesn't destroy offense 100% either, as discussed. Something can be done. Also, DS-X can't even switch in on these types of teams.
It's very comparable and my example stands.
 
My Metagross / Salamence / Starmie / Heatran / Exeggutor / Heracross team is designed to straight up sweep.

Did you miss the whole "bulky offense =/= sweeper offense thing? That is a much, much bulkier team than the play-style we're talking about.

If you're sane, you'd say no. He wasn't Uber in RSE and if you throw HP Ghost into slot 3 and your favorite Fire type in Slot 4 the same arguments can be made.

er, have you PLAYED RSE? The "sweeper" style you're talking about didn't exist. It wasn't viable that generation, because pure offense didn't have the power to break through pure stall without Magnezone, etc. So that's pretty much irrelevant.


Actually, that's not a bad or rhetorical question. "Is forcing a team to account for you in its conception something that is overcentralizing?" Let's take the limited example of pure sweeping teams. Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves. Is accounting for something in a team building process only required because something is broken?

72% of OU. Should I put Lanturn on my team now?

Do you even comprehend the concept of synergy?

You can't slap random shit on a team and expect it to work.

I've tried that. It fails.

Why should I have to account for something that completely disrupts my gameplan, for the sake of one pokemon? I understand that you don't care about the principle of "allowing as many viable team styles as possible" but I do and Deoxys-E clearly does that.

The arguements against D-S are that people who change their teams (gasp) then force you to change your team (gasp) or lose. This is what people would refer to as a changing metagame. People who want to ban D-S refuse to change their strategies, and thus doom themselves to losing.

Hey, let's unban Kyogre!

That way, everyone who refuses to change their strategy to include Ludicolo and Shedinja are doomed to losing!
 
I honestly don't think my analogy was THAT bad, but before you could finish your post i put it in a quote box due to it being inferior to the question. Aerodactyl is a fast, semi-hard hitting Pokémon with a decent movepool of super effective attacks. You're saying it's not the same because Stone Edge can miss and HP Ghost / Crunch / AA have shit BP and there's a speed tie. Surely you can't be saying that slightly inferior type coverage and tying Speed with some pokémon (and not beating Ninjask) made Aerodactyl OU?

Regardless of wether Pokémon are identical or not, you can still compare them. You've bashed me on comparing everything from Garchomp and PoryZ to Aero and Deoxys when these pokemon have a few similarities, by saying that there are minute differences. What is so wrong with making rough analogies across Pokémon with only minor differences between them? Also a "logical fallacy" is a false premise or a conclusion not based on the premises. Making a comparison between two late game cleaners and a comparion between an antistall and an antisweep is hardly a false premise.

You can't possibly argue that what CrushKing does to stall teams is what Deoxys E does to offensive teams in it's full effect and without taking everything into consideration. Comparing what something does to a stall team and what something else does to an offensive team is just a pure fallacy since you offer nothing to back it up other than the simplified "IT STOPS THEM IF THEY'RE UNPREPARED"
Uh, do you need me to show you how Crush King bashes in stall teams? The opponent's "backnig it up" is showing an example team weak to Deoxys-e. That's hardly more than the entirely fair assertion I made that an anti stall set gives stall teams a lot of trouble. How is it an unfair and uncalled for comparison?

Please explain to me how it is not a fair comparison, rather than just stating it as such.

72% of OU. Should I put Lanturn on my team now?

Do you even comprehend the concept of synergy?

You can't slap random shit on a team and expect it to work.

I've tried that. It fails.
Correct. I understand synergy, but saying that it's incovenient to have one of the numerous Pokémon that won't be 2HKO'd by Deoxys is ridiculous. Just because you have to account for something while building the type of team you like to use doesn't mean that the Pokémon in question is Uber.

I've said "jut because xyz doesn't mean uber" a lot, and you could argue "the reasons are stacking up", but I'm really restating the same thing in hopes of trying to show that just because Deoxys-S doesn't compeletely fit into the OU puzzle without pushing a few pieces around it doesn't mean that it's Uber, it means it's a threat. Seriously, if Weavile were Uber and moved down to OU I'd hear shit about how every Psychic type is nulified and that teams have to prepare for Weavile now.
 
So the overall effect of D-S is decentralising the metagame by forcing certain teams to adjust. He is certainly OU.

this is exactly why i believe Deoxys S to be uber. if he was still able to be countered using an offensive team, then i wouldnt care. but since he forces us to change our teams, i believe him to be uber. if someone is forced to change their team because of a single guy, something is wrong.
Im throwing my vote in for uber.
 
this is exactly why i believe Deoxys S to be uber. if he was still able to be countered using an offensive team, then i wouldnt care. but since he forces us to change our teams, i believe him to be uber. if someone is forced to change their team because of a single guy, something is wrong.
Im throwing my vote in for uber.



Did Scarfchomp force you to change your teams at all? What about SpecsMence? They aren't Uber, and that is exactly what they did, so that argument is completely irrelevant.


EDIT: Sorry Tangerine, I missed your edits for quite a while its much easier if you just make another post...

Now that you have stated your argument clearly and in no uncertain terms, see my comment above in this post.

Also, I have not discredited evidence, I have asked to be shown hard evidence. Only one person has presented some thus far, and it is base don A) his word, and B) a possible Wobby factor.

Please note, Iggy and I have been PMing, and now thta I know his team, I presented to him another argument. I may post the results of our discussion at the end, until then please leave all discussion between him and me out of this.
 
Ancien Regim, please tell me where you are gettign that 72% stat from...I'm quite curious.

Umm, it hits 34/47 pokemon in OU super-effectively, and when 34/47 is converted into a percentage it becomes 72%. Try it on your calculator, 34 divided by 47, times 100...it comes out to 72%.
 
Originally Posted by Fat Chris is Me

Deoxys-S, at best, can score Super-Effective hits on something like 12 out of 17 types (my type chart is downstairs) with Psychic / Bolt / Beam / Fighting move. How hard is it to pack a Bug, Fire, Psychic, Ghost, or Electric type on your team? Is forcing a team to account for you in its conception something that is overcentralizing?

Actually, let me stop right there as that's not a bad or rhetorical question. "Is forcing a team to account for you in its conception something that is overcentralizing?" Let's take the limited example of pure sweeping teams. Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves. Is accounting for something in a team building process only required because something is broken?

Bolded what to harp on, because your proving our point.

First, the types you list and their OU pokemon, and how Deoxys-E fairs against them:

Bug - Ninjask (T-Bolt / Ice Beam), Yanmega (T-Bolt / Ice Beam), Heracross (Psychic / Psycho Boost), Scizor (Yay!!! Oh wait, he's steel)

Fire - Infernape (Psychic / Psycho Boost), Heatran (Superpower)

Psychic - Shadow ball is not uncommon... and debated use with Psychic... anyway - Metagross, Bronzong, Jirachi (Oh wait, more bulky steels), Azelf (Shadow Ball)

Ghost - Gengar (Psychic / Shadow Ball), Dusknoir is not for offensive teams...

Electric - Jolteon, Electivire, Zapdos (Ice Beam)

Yeah so out of those types you listed, Jolteon and Electivire are the only pokemon not taking super effective damage that are even considered on pure offense teams. Neither of them can OHKO Deoxys- and both are 2HKOed themselves, OHKO if Psycho Boost. But like evidence suggest, bulky steels show up to counter him.

"Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves."

Again, proving our point. Steel types are the only options for a sweeping team then. Overcentralizing. And this scenario is ONLY for Deoxys-E. You don't need strong defense to beat Lucario or Garchomp or any other OU pokemon thanks to the principle of revenge killing, but Deoxys-E is an exception and makes offensive teams pay the price.

EDIT:
Did Scarfchomp force you to change your teams at all? What about SpecsMence? They aren't Uber, and that is exactly what they did, so that argument is completely irrelevant.

Scarfchomp doesn't 6-0 an offensive team. It's LOCKED into an attack. And I can easily revenge it with Weavile :-). Doesn't change my strategy. Doesn't make offense less viable. My team can have Infernape. I might just change Infernapes EVs to outspeed Scarfchomp with a Scarf, but that doesnt mean I dump Infernape altogether as a pokemon. No matter what an offensive team does, it HAS to alter its pokemon selection to find a way around Deoxys-E, hence uber. You can't outspeed it, and it has the freedom to pick you apart.
 
Reposting because I added alot and it got pushed back a page.

Okay, let's pretend Choice Scarf doesn't exist. Aerodactyl is faster than the entire game except for Deoxys E, has plenty of coverage, and a decent Attack stat that's even better than Deoxys-E. Is Aerodactyl broken? My Metagross / Salamence / Starmie / Heatran / Exeggutor / Heracross team is designed to straight up sweep. Aerodactyl 2HKO's the entire team with EQ / Stone Edge / Crunch / Aerial Ace. Is he Uber?
"Hey let's Compare Pokemon with Theorymon!" Don't even try - comparing Pokemon and creating artificial situations like this isn't even the point, especially since Aerodactyl wishes it had the coverage and power of Deoxys E.

DO NOT make these kinds of flawed arguments.

Now I know that example looks incredibly pointless and even worse than theorymon, but think about it. Is Aerodactyl a complete stop to this full sweeping team? Not really. Metagross has Meteor Mash, Starmie has Surf, Heatran might have HP Something, Heracross hits it neutral and KO's it. But it still has "ample" opportunity to switch in on stuff, like Metagross Earthquake, Heatran Earth Power / Flamethrower if it's lucky... so is in this case Aerodactyl Uber for breaking teams with a bunch of sweepers since he's faster and has a good movepool? If you're sane, you'd say no. He wasn't Uber in RSE and if you throw HP Ghost into slot 3 and your favorite Fire type in Team Slot 4 the same arguments can be made.
Aerodactyl also has a speed Tie with Jolteon and friends, and is outsped by lol Electrode and Ninjask. Your analogy fails. Aerodactyl's attacks other than Stone Edge and EQ have shit BP and has a tendency to miss. DO NOT compare Pokemon like this ever again.

I'll argue "no". Why? Because there are a lot of threats teams of many kinds have to account for. Crush King stops stall teams unprepared for him. Is Crush King Uber because the stall team has to account for Crush King? No. If you think "Yes" is the answer, you'll be up all night talking about how xyz is so broken.
You can't possibly argue that what CrushKing does to stall teams is what Deoxys E does to offensive teams in it's full effect and without taking everything into consideration. Comparing what something does to a stall team and what something else does to an offensive team is just a pure fallacy since you offer nothing to back it up other than the simplified "IT STOPS THEM IF THEY'RE UNPREPARED"

This isn't a valid arguement either. If a team no longer works, you either adapt or lose. D-S doesn't stop you from playing an offensive sweeper team, it stops you from playing a 6 pokemon sweeper team, there is a difference.
How is it not? It's a team based on resistances. Dugtrio has no place in it.

When I use Deoxys E, I pretty much scout and make sure I take down the counters to it so I can get a clean sweep later. Sure, you can argue this happens for "any pokemon" but once the only steel type in the Pokemon is down it becomes horrendously easy to sweep the rest of an offensive team with Deoxys E once you weaken the "counters" enough. This is why I don't think it's a valid argument, and why my argument, I feel is valid.

1. If we are deciding about Deoxys, and the evidence he is using specifically states that Wobbufet is an integral part of his team, it most certainly taints the conclusions he found. I have read every word of these posts, so do not insult me again by saying I have not.
And now, in June, I've managed to take my "imperfectluck" name to ladder's #1 spot with this team again. It is simply a team that performs like no other I've ever made in terms of success rate, simply because Wobbuffet is great against stallers and Deoxys-E against offense, forming a duo that can simply destroy most team strategies out there with little effort. Deoxys-E is by and large the single best cleaner in the game, in my opinion, and the only Pokemon that is able to fulfill this role.
Read. IPL's post is to say that Deoxys E is simply overpowering against Offensive teams.

2. I have not said "just use Dugtrio". I have said that he is an option, and please also remember that nobody has yet given me an example of a team with synergy, that is fast-paced offensive, and deoxys weak. All the teams mentioned thus far with that style of play have had a counter to deoxys. Do you think this is just by chance? I think it is because many pokes can counter deoxys, and you are ignoring them. You forget how weak its neutral hits are, and just how many fast sweepers can actually take them.
Um, if you actually read the posts, IggyBot posted his team a while back. Are you going to just say "it lacks synergy"? And are you going to say "it has a counter to deoxys" when you haven't even played with the team and basing your argument off theorymon?

His neutral hits still hit pretty well, just not against bulky things. How many fast sweepers are going to hit Deoxys back when Deoxys E can hit it for a super effective hit anyway? Name me a fast sweeper that doesn't get destroyed by Deoxys E, please.

3. Please do not call me a troll simply because I oppose your side of the argument and ask for evidence. Every one of these posts is on topic, and I still have not received any hard evidence. I am the only one who has presented evidence at all, in the usage statistics that are virtually unchanged since Deo-E was introduced. If its so good, why isn't it highe rup on the list?
I am calling you a troll because you are discrediting evidence that doesn't support your argument and implying certain users are terrible battlers when they are probably one of the best battlers around here.

I have posted many times about the flaws of usage statistics and I'm not going to bother repeating myself. You can go look it up and see how usage stats don't mean everything.

4. The mamo comparison was perfectly reasonable, much more-so than the rampant Blissey one. If your team is ripped apart by one poke, is that poke automatically Uber? That is essentially what you are saying.
What style of play does Mamoswine destroy, pray tell? This isn't a case of "My team is swept by infernape, it is uber", it is more about "Deoxys E is a bit TOO effective against offensive styled teams based on resistances, it is uber". Sure, you can run a dedicated counter to it on your offensive team but considering how by the time Deoxys E shows up the counter is likely weakened to the point where Deoxys E can clean through it, this is the reason why people are saying it destroys offensive style teams too much. Just running a counter isn't enough considering Deoxys E's unique style of usage. This is of course, subjective and that's why we're voting in the first place.

You can change your team, lets say you can add Metagross, but it doesnt really matter since Deoxys E is in the end, a late game sweeper. I would have swept a team after being down 5-1 and lost 2-1 only because of sand veil, which shows what Deoxys can do once it takes down it's counter (which I took out with Deoxys, oh the irony?). The argument is that You can't really run a pure resistance based offensive team anymore without it being an offensive team anymore considering the total number of fast offensive sweeping teams that are deoxys counters either overlap in typing or they can't really sweep. You can't honestly compare this to stall without showing that you really do not know what you're talking about when it comes to playing style. Teams do adjust for specsmence and scarfchomp considering they don't really dominate a playing style

In the end all you guys are doing is jumping into the arguments without understanding everything that is going on. I do agree that people have done a bad job presenting the arguments but there is a reason why your arguments don't hold ground. Yes, this is subjective but none of your arguments even get close to the point of the argument in the first place.

DO NOT respond to anything above the last 3 paragraphs, they are just little points and they add nothing to the argument. They will be deleted for being off topic.
 
Did Scarfchomp force you to change your teams at all? What about SpecsMence? They aren't Uber, and that is exactly what they did, so that argument is completely irrelevant.

specsmence and scarfchomp have 100% counters. d-e doesn't. you can heal with gliscor, blissey, hippow, umbreon, skarm etc. with reliable 50% recovery moves. with d-e the only possible healing counter is jiraichi. you can bring rest into discussion but that is not reliable if you want a consistent counter, even with rest talk.
 
How is it not? It's a team based on resistances. Dugtrio has no place in it.

When I use Deoxys E, I pretty much scout and make sure I take down the counters to it so I can get a clean sweep later. Sure, you can argue this happens for "any pokemon" but once the only steel type in the Pokemon is down it becomes horrendously easy to sweep the rest of an offensive team with Deoxys E once you weaken the "counters" enough. This is why I don't think it's a valid argument, and why my argument, I feel is valid.
Indeed it can be said for any pokemon, so unless you are trying to get any pokemon banned instead of D-S, I suggest that you make an arguement about only D-S. I'm not being an ass (maybe), but if this strategy is broadened to any pokemon, banning one over it is unjust. Your team is designed to beat the shit out of pokemon until D-S can sweep, this is no different from x doing better than y at sweeping after everything is weakened. Having D-S do it easier just means you are min-maxing, getting the best pokemon for the job (until the metagame changes), and strategy wise is no different from any other.

If your strategy fails, it needs to be changed, it is that simple. This is an evolving metagame, change or lose. Do we see people smashing the same teams into Obi's stall? No. They changed, and thus it isn't stallfest anymore.

If the metagame cannot change, then there is a problem. So, has the metagame refused to change or can it not change? If the metagame hasn't changed, that is a user error, as they refuse to change or the counter hasn't been found. Min-maxing also means you run the "best" team, which in an evolving metagame, there isn't one. However, in a metagame that cannot change, there is a best team, which would leading to bannings (and is the basis of the Uber teir). Does D-S fit the definition of stopping a metagame from changing and making a team/strategy the best?

I wrote that out so well, you should use that as the definition for what defines a banning to the Uber tier.
 
Umm, it hits 34/47 pokemon in OU super-effectively, and when 34/47 is converted into a percentage it becomes 72%. Try it on your calculator, 34 divided by 47, times 100...it comes out to 72%.

Thank you, I just wondered.

Bolded what to harp on, because your proving our point.

First, the types you list and their OU pokemon, and how Deoxys-E fairs against them:

Bug - Ninjask (T-Bolt / Ice Beam), Yanmega (T-Bolt / Ice Beam), Heracross (Psychic / Psycho Boost), Scizor (Yay!!! Oh wait, he's steel)

Fire - Infernape (Psychic / Psycho Boost), Heatran (Superpower)

Psychic - Shadow ball is not uncommon... and debated use with Psychic... anyway - Metagross, Bronzong, Jirachi (Oh wait, more bulky steels), Azelf (Shadow Ball)

Ghost - Gengar (Psychic / Shadow Ball), Dusknoir is not for offensive teams...

Electric - Jolteon, Electivire, Zapdos (Ice Beam)

Yeah so out of those types you listed, Jolteon and Electivire are the only pokemon not taking super effective damage that are even considered on pure offense teams. Neither of them can OHKO Deoxys- and both are 2HKOed themselves, OHKO if Psycho Boost. But like evidence suggest, bulky steels show up to counter him.

"Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves."

Again, proving our point. Steel types are the only options for a sweeping team then. Overcentralizing. And this scenario is ONLY for Deoxys-E. You don't need strong defense to beat Lucario or Garchomp or any other OU pokemon thanks to the principle of revenge killing, but Deoxys-E is an exception and makes offensive teams pay the price.

EDIT:


Scarfchomp doesn't 6-0 an offensive team. It's LOCKED into an attack. And I can easily revenge it with Weavile :-). Doesn't change my strategy. Doesn't make offense less viable. My team can have Infernape. I might just change Infernapes EVs to outspeed Scarfchomp with a Scarf, but that doesnt mean I dump Infernape altogether as a pokemon. No matter what an offensive team does, it HAS to alter its pokemon selection to find a way around Deoxys-E, hence uber. You can't outspeed it, and it has the freedom to pick you apart.

If your team is using key resistances and switch ins without revenge killers, as defined by Iggy and Tangerine, Weavile will not be on it. Just because you have to change you team to accomodate something DOES NOT MAKE IT UBER! Did anybody NOT make a change to accomodate the relatively new SD Luke that rampaged through teams for a short while before...oh wait! Before teams were changed.

specsmence and scarfchomp have 100% counters. d-e doesn't. you can heal with gliscor, blissey, hippow, umbreon, skarm etc. with reliable 50% recovery moves. with d-e the only possible healing counter is jiraichi. you can bring rest into discussion but that is not reliable if you want a consistent counter, even with rest talk.

And those counters had to be introduced to teams and made more people adapt and change to them, which was my line of parallel to Deo-E, which you seem to have missed...


What I am trying to say is that just because somethign will change the metagame around, thta does not make it Uber. Take any recent innovation, SD Luke seems to work well here, and tell me that it has not changed the way teams are built or the way people play the game. Its the same thing with Deoxys, only it is a poke not just a new moveset. In simple terms, it kind of is a new moveset, just on a face we haven't seen before. (You may not get that, I am tired and a bit off)
 
Reference point: As of RIGHT HERE, 36 non-stricken votes by 3 month + members have been Uber, and 51 non-stricken votes by 3 month + members have been for Standard. I realize it's not a straight up vote, this is only a reference point not an argument.

"Deoxys-S forces teams to either carry something with defenses not made of paper or something not weak to any of his moves."

Again, proving our point. Steel types are the only options for a sweeping team then. Overcentralizing.
I addressed this point though. Is it "overcentraizing" to have to account for a Pokémon when building a team? I don't believe so. I mean, Special Sweeping teams have to account for Blissey and Physical Sweeping teams have to account for the multitude of physical walls. I don't think that teams having to account for what could potentially stop them is something that is very "overcentarlizing".

Tangerine: I read your post and responded to it asking for more on your part and claiming that I believe I made a fair comparison on the Crush King thing.

Alright, I'm done for tonight. Read all of Obi's posts if you want to debate me, especially the one that says that just because something has an effect on the metagame in some way doesn't mean it OVER-effects the metagame.
 
Indeed it can be said for any pokemon, so unless you are trying to get any pokemon banned instead of D-S, I suggest that you make an arguement about only D-S. I'm not being an ass (maybe), but if this strategy is broadened to any pokemon, banning one over it is unjust. Your team is designed to beat the shit out of pokemon until D-S can sweep, this is no different from x doing better than y at sweeping after everything is weakened. Having D-S do it easier just means you are min-maxing, getting the best pokemon for the job (until the metagame changes), and strategy wise is no different from any other.

If your strategy fails, it needs to be changed, it is that simple. This is an evolving metagame, change or lose. Do we see people smashing the same teams into Obi's stall? No. They changed, and thus it isn't stallfest anymore.

If the metagame cannot change, then there is a problem. So, has the metagame refused to change or can it not change? If the metagame hasn't changed, that is a user error, as they refuse to change or the counter hasn't been found. Min-maxing also means you run the "best" team, which in an evolving metagame, there isn't one. However, in a metagame that cannot change, there is a best team, which would leading to bannings (and is the basis of the Uber teir). Does D-S fit the definition of stopping a metagame from changing and making a team/strategy the best?

I wrote that out so well, you should use that as the definition for what defines a banning to the Uber tier.

Saying that there's a best team in Pokemon is like saying there's a best player in Tetris - it hardly matters.

Don't be so cocky as to assume your definition of Uber is any good considering it isn't even a usable definition. Why don't you read the "The Definition of Ubers" thread in PR and you can see I posted in it? :heart:

Read the rest of my post to get the full crux of the argument and see why I'm disregarding "your point"

I'm not going to bother responding to you guys anymore. I made my point, and if you wish to argue then feel free to PM me
 
If your strategy fails, it needs to be changed, it is that simple. This is an evolving metagame, change or lose. Do we see people smashing the same teams into Obi's stall? No. They changed, and thus it isn't stallfest anymore

There's a difference between people changing strategies, and strategies being changed because of an arbitary decision. So now that said decision has been made, we have to live with it because?

Does D-S fit the definition of stopping a metagame from changing and making a team/strategy the best?

Somehow, I don't think the predominance of a single style of play over others is a positive.

I'm going to say it again.

If a team that was viable, suddenly becomes unviable because of a single pokemon, is the problem the team or that single pokemon?
 
There's a difference between people changing strategies, and strategies being changed because of an arbitary decision. So now that said decision has been made, we have to live with it because?



Somehow, I don't think the predominance of a single style of play over others is a positive.

I'm going to say it again.

If a team that was viable, suddenly becomes unviable because of a single pokemon, is the problem the team or that single pokemon?


Its actually the opposite of that...every style of play but the one you favor most is much less affected...it the un-dominace, if you will, of a single type of play-which is not such a bad thing.
 
Its actually the opposite of that...every style of play but the one you favor most is much less affected...it the un-dominace, if you will, of a single type of play-which is not such a bad thing.

"Un-dominance"? Now you're just making up words.

You're acting like all-out offense dominated before Deoxys-E. It was highly effective, but there were effective bulky offense/stall teams long before.
 
"Un-dominance"? Now you're just making up words.

You're acting like all-out offense dominated before Deoxys-E. It was highly effective, but there were effective bulky offense/stall teams long before.


I fail to see any argument there...and I believe I said "if you will" acknowledging I made up the word because I could not think of a better way to say it...read the post please.

I never insinuated that all-out offense dominated, thats the impression I have received from you, jrrr, IPL, Tangerine, and Iggy. Lets keep that straight.
 
OK I lied I've been up for a little longer. Hitit4three, you're really not doing a good job of debating here. Ancien Regime made ONE post without an argument and you treat him like he has none at all. His point (although I disagree) does have merit, so stop treating it as if it's baseless. Please. I don't want the "pro-OU" side to look terrible.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top