Handling Proposals

Status
Not open for further replies.

Dogfish44

You can call me Jiggly
is a Forum Moderatoris a CAP Contributoris a Top Community Contributor Alumnus
Please do not post here unless you are a Council Member or Deck Knight. Anyone else who posts here WILL be infracted. Thank you.

Our current proposal system is below par. Let's improve it!

Here is the new proposal system:

[box]Proposal for how proposals are done (amended):

Feedback thread is redone. A proposal is posted, and rather than debate the proposal in the thread people quote the post and say either "I support this proposal and wish to move this to a discussion", or "I disagree with this proposal and wish to move it to discussion". Alternatively, a person can respond with "I agree with this proposal but do not believe this proposal should go to discussion" or "I disagree with this proposal and believe it should not be slated for discussion". The first five votes will be counted.

If in the five votes on a proposal, at least two say to not move to debate, the council members can amongst themselves through private chats/IRC take any option:
  • Instantly vote to implement the proposal
  • Move proposal to discussion
  • Ignore the proposal entirely
If fewer than two of the first five votes say to not move to debate, the council will default to moving the proposal to discussion. Whichever course of action the council decides on will be posted in the feedback thread.

Assumming a proposal garners the required support to discuss, a discussion is then opened. Discussion will last until such time that the discussion has either become inactive or gotten out of hand (at the discretion of the council). Once this point has been reached, council members will hold a public vote, using single vote for polls with 2 options and IRV for polls with more than 2 options. The options shall consist of the current system (ie, no change), the original proposal and any amended proposals with decent support. If, after all council members have voted, the vote is tied or otherwise in deadlock, Deck Knight reserves the right to cast a tiebreaking vote. If this still results in a tie in a poll that uses IRV, there will be another vote between the remaining options in that poll.

In the event that a proposal does not get five votes on it within 25 posts of its inception, the proposal may be bumped by making a post containing a link to the proposal and additional links to all votes cast on the proposal with the stances being mentioned in the post. This process may be repeated as necessary every 25 posts after each bump; however, if a proposal ends up with four votes on it twice in a row, the council may make a decision to veto, discuss or implement the proposal based on the votes so far.[/box]

Your options are:

[box]Adopt the new system of handling proposals
Don't Adopt the new system of handling proposals
[/box]

What each vote represents should be obvious here... first to 4 votes for an instant majority!
 
Adopt the new system of handling proposals

Let's start to cut the wasted time that proposals such as this and the Huge Power/Pure Power proposal caused.
 
Adopt the new system of handling proposals

Bring back ampersands or something! But in all seriousness, this needs to be implemented.
 
Implemented. Since this only affects the political side of CAP ASB & not the game system itself, I felt that a post in the Implementation Thread was kinda unnecessary, since the OP said that only changes to the game system itself should be announced in that thread. Otherwise, the new proposal system is now in the Feedback OP, & yeah. Here is to some faster implementations!
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Back
Top