i agree moon is stupid as hell but jesus christ people, give up on the booster energy narrative already. no one's buying it. let's take a look at the data, in simple visual form, to figure out why:
so, even if i'm
extremely generous and assume that all of the first three categories are broken (they aren't) and that booster energy is the single shared element breaking all of them (it isn't), that's still six data points against fourteen. you're outnumbered more than two to one in the absolute best case for your argument
now if we factor in that flutter is obviously still broken without booster, bundle didn't even
use booster, and neither valiant nor bolt are particularly problematic right now, we have exactly two cases left: roaring moon and gouging fire. booster energy played a role in the gouging fire ban, certainly, but would i say it was
the thing that caused the ban? jury's still out on that one. and frankly, we've had enough argument about gouging fire to last a lifetime so let's not let the jury back in. (don't worry, all the jurors have coats and stuff, they'll be fine. if anything it's probably nice for them to get a breath of fresh air instead of being cooped up in the courthouse all day)
and then there's
this asshole. roaring moon. angry boomerang. spicy croissant. the prequel to the sequel to salamence. marvel's what if they gave garchomp dragon dance. whatever you want to call it, it's definitely a fucker, and i for one would be very glad to see it go. and yes, this one
is exclusively because of booster energy. but arguing for a booster energy ban just to deal with one mon is overkill. worse, unlike rage fist and a handful of other examples, this has actually relevant crossfire—a ban of booster energy would hurt great tusk in a meta that's entirely held together by great tusk, and it hurts treads a pretty significant amount too. couldn't we rather, i dunno, ban the one single mon that booster energy is breaking and leave the other dozen or so alone? i'm under no illusion that a roaring moon ban is ever going to happen as much as i want it to, but it's definitely more sensible than a booster energy ban, so why not argue for that instead?